Abstract
Properties of arithmetic operations are important in mathematics and play a significant role in elementary school students’ learning of mathematics. At the same time, it is quite challenging to help students learn arithmetic operational properties beyond memorization, so that they know when and how to use a specific arithmetic property. This paper reports a study containing two parts to explore students’ learning of the Commutative Property of Addition (CPA) as related to the content presentation in textbooks. Part one is to assess selected students’ performance on CPA at the end of Grade two, and part two is to explore possible contributions of textbooks to students’ performance in Shanghai. Firstly, we evaluated the performance of 41 second-graders on CPA by collecting data through a paper-and-pencil test, which was followed up with individual interviews. Through analyzing how textbooks present and organize this topic, we sought to better understand from a curriculum standpoint how students’ performance on CPA is impacted by textbooks. Results revealed that Shanghai textbooks make a positive contribution to students’ learning performance. The findings from this study help to shed light on how those textbooks aid student learning, and provide an example for further reflection on student learning of arithmetic operational properties in different curricula.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baroody, A., Berent, R., & Packman, D. (1982). The use of mathematical structure by inner city children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4(2), 5–13.
Baroody, A., Ginsburg, H., & Waxman, B. (1983). Children’s use of mathematical structure. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 156–168.
Baroody, A., & Purpura, D. J. (2017). Early number and operations: Whole numbers. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 308–354). NCTM.
Baroody, A., Wilkins, J., & Tiilikainen, S. (2003). The development of children’s understanding of additive commutativity: From proto quantitative concept to general concept? In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 127–160). Erlbaum.
Bermejo, V., & Rodriguez, P. (1993). Children’s understanding of the commutative law of addition. Learning and Instruction, 3(1), 55–72.
Bisanz, J., & LeFevre, J. (1992). Understanding elementary mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 113–136). Elsevier Science.
Bisanz, J., Watchorn, R., Piatt, C., & Sherman, J. (2009). On “understanding” children’s developing use of inversion. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 10–24.
Blazer, C. (2011). Strategies for reducing mathematics anxiety. Information Capsule, 1102. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536509
Bokhove, C., Miyazaki, M., Komatsu, K., Chino, K., Leung, A., & Mok, I. A. (2019). The role of “Opportunity to Learn” in the Geometry curriculum: A multilevel comparison of six countries. Frontiers in Education, 4.
Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. (Research report No. 00–2). National Center for Improving student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
Ching, B. H. H., & Nunes, T. (2017). Children’s understanding of the commutativity and complement principles: A latent profile analysis. Learning and Instruction, 47, 65–79.
Deng, L., Wu, S., Chen, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Digital game-based learning in a Shanghai primary-school mathematics class: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 709–717.
Ding, M., Li, X., Hassler, R., & Barnett, E. (2021). Understanding the properties of operations: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), 39–64.
Fagginger Auer, M. F., Hickendorff, M., Van Putten, C. M., Béguin, A. A., & Heiser, W. J. (2016). Multilevel latent class analysis for large-scale educational assessment data: Exploring the relation between the curriculum and students’ mathematical strategies. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(2), 144–159.
Fan, L., Chen, J., Zhu, Y., Qiu, X., & Hu, Q. (2004). Textbook use within and beyond Chinese mathematics classrooms: A study of 12 secondary schools in Kunming and Fuzhou of China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. World Scientific.
Fan, L., Trouche, L., Qi, C., Rezat, S., & Visnovska, J. (Eds.). (2018). Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues. Springer.
Hadar, L. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn: Mathematics textbooks and students’ achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 153–166.
Heinze, A., Marschick, F., & Lipowsky, F. (2009). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers. Adaptive strategy use and the influence of instruction in German third grade. ZDM – the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41(5), 591–604.
Houang, R. T., & Schmidt, W. H. (2008). TIMSS international curriculum analysis and measuring educational opportunities [Paper presentation]. 3rd IEA International Research Conference.
Howe, R. E. (2018). Cultural knowledge for teaching mathematics. In Y. Li, W. J. Lewis, & J. J. Madden (Eds.), Mathematics Matters in Education – Essays in honor of Roger E. Howe (pp. 19–39). Springer.
Huang, J. (2006). Teacher Guide 4.1. Shanghai Education Publishing.
Huang, X. (2018a). Real Shanghai Mathematics-Pupil Textbook 1.1. Collins.
Huang, X. (2018b). Real Shanghai Mathematics-Pupil Textbook 1.2. Collins.
Huang, X. (2018c). Real Shanghai Mathematics-Pupil Textbook 2.1. Collins.
Huang, X., Huang, R., & Bosch, M. (2021). Analyzing a teacher’s learning through cross-cultural collaboration: A praxeological perspective of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 427–446.
Huang, X., Song, C., & Li, Y. (2020). An exploratory study of second grade students’ learning and using the commutative property of addition in Shanghai. Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(4), 38–43.
Knuth, E., Stephens, A., Blanton, M., & Gardiner, A. (2016). Build an early foundation for algebra success. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(6), 65–68.
Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 37(4), 297–312.
Kullberg, A., & Björklund, C. (2020). Preschoolers’ different ways of structuring part-part-whole relations with finger patterns when solving an arithmetic task. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(4), 767–778.
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234–241.
Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ practices and thinking in lesson plan development: A case of teaching fraction division. ZDM – the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41, 717–731.
Li, Y., & Huang, R. (Eds.). (2013). How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching. Routledge.
Li, Y., & Lappan, G. (Eds.). (2014). Mathematics curriculum in school education. Springer.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Erlbaum.
Ministry of Education. (2011). National mathematics curriculum. Beijing Normal University Publishing House.
Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count: A policy paper. University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol I). OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol I). OECD Publishing.
Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM, 33(5), 158–175.
Presmeg, N. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42–46.
Pu, S., Sun, X., & Li, Y. (2018). How do Chinese teachers acquire and improve their knowledge through intensive textbook studies? In Y. Li & R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese acquire and improve mathematics knowledge for teaching (pp. 165–184). Brill.
Resnick, L. B. (1992). From protoquantities to operators: Building mathematical competence on a foundation of everyday knowledge. In G. Leinhardt, R. T. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 373–429). Erlbaum.
Robitaille, D. F., Schmidt, W. H., Raizan, S. A., McKnight, C. C., Britton, C. D., & Nicol, C. (Eds.). (1993). Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science (TIMSS Monograph No. 1). Pacific Educational Press.
Schifter, D. (2009). Representation-based proof in the elementary grades. In D. A. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective (pp. 71–86). Routledge.
Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. American Educator, 26(2), 1–17.
Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (2004). Shanghai elementary and secondary school mathematics curriculum. Shanghai Education Publisher.
Sievert, H., van den Ham, A.-K., Niedermeyer, I., & Heinze, A. (2019). Effects of mathematics textbooks on the development of primary school children’s adaptive expertise in arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101716.
Sievert, H., van den Ham, A.-K., Niedermeyer, I., & Heinze, A. (2021). Are firrst graders’ arithmetic skills related to the quality of mathematics textbooks? A study on students’ use of arithmetic principles. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101401.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). NCTM, Information Age.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. Summit Books.
Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258–288.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Kluwer.
Van Steenbrugge, H., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2013). Teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series in Flanders: Does it (not) matter which mathematics textbook series schools choose? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 322–353.
Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.
Wang, Y., & Fan, L. (2021). Investigating students’ perceptions concerning textbook use in mathematics: A comparative study of secondary schools between Shanghai and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(5), 675–691.
White, J. J. (2017). The Peano Axioms: An IBL unit constructing the natural numbers. Primus, 27(7), 725–735.
Yao, Y., Kong, Q., & Cai, J. (2018). Investigating elementary and middle school students’ subjective well-being and mathematical performance in Shanghai. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(Suppl 1), 107–127.
Yuan, H., & Huang, X. (2019). China-England mathematics teacher exchange and its impact. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(3), 480–508.
Zhang, Q., Wong, N., & Shi, O. (2018). Textbook use: The interaction between teacher and textbook-inquiry on teachers’ use of mathematics textbooks in Chinese mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Journal of East China Normal University, 36(1), 77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Textbook | Unit | Contents | Page | Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade one | First semester | Addition and subtraction within 10 | Split and combine | 21 | (P1, C1) |
22 | (P1, C1) | ||||
Addition | 23 | (P3, C1) | |||
24 | (P3, C1) | ||||
25 | (P3, C1) | ||||
List number sentences | 60 | (P3, C1) | |||
Mathematical amusement | 62 | (P3, C1) | |||
Second semester | Addition and subtraction within 100 | Adding or subtracting a multiple of ten | 26 | (P1, C2) (P2, C2) (P4, C2) | |
27 | (P1, C2) (P2, C2) (P4, C2) | ||||
Adding or subtracting two-digit numbers | 32 | (P2, C2) (P4, C2) | |||
33 | (P2, C2) (P4, C2) | ||||
34 | (P2, C2) | ||||
37 | (P2, C2) (P4, C2) | ||||
38 | (P2, C2) | ||||
Review and improvement | Review addition and subtraction with two-digit | 61 | (P4, C2) | ||
62 | (P4, C2) | ||||
64 | (P4, C2) | ||||
65 | (P4, C2) | ||||
Exchange | 67 | (P1, C1) | |||
(P3, C1) | |||||
68 | (P4, C3) | ||||
Grade two | First semester | Review and improvement | Review addition and subtraction with two-digit | 2 | (P5, C3) |
Miss numbers in box | 6 | (P4, C3) | |||
Second semester | Addition and subtraction with three-digit | Addition with three-digit | 28 | (P1, C2) (P4, C2) | |
Subtraction with three-digit | 33 | (P1, C2) (P4, C2) | |||
Review and improvement | Simplifying operation | 69 | (P5, C3) | ||
70 | (P5, C3) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, X., Xiao, Y., Webster, J.S. et al. Exploring Shanghai students’ mathematics learning as related to content presentation in textbooks: the case of the commutative property of addition. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 595–609 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01362-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01362-6