Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Shanghai students’ mathematics learning as related to content presentation in textbooks: the case of the commutative property of addition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Properties of arithmetic operations are important in mathematics and play a significant role in elementary school students’ learning of mathematics. At the same time, it is quite challenging to help students learn arithmetic operational properties beyond memorization, so that they know when and how to use a specific arithmetic property. This paper reports a study containing two parts to explore students’ learning of the Commutative Property of Addition (CPA) as related to the content presentation in textbooks. Part one is to assess selected students’ performance on CPA at the end of Grade two, and part two is to explore possible contributions of textbooks to students’ performance in Shanghai. Firstly, we evaluated the performance of 41 second-graders on CPA by collecting data through a paper-and-pencil test, which was followed up with individual interviews. Through analyzing how textbooks present and organize this topic, we sought to better understand from a curriculum standpoint how students’ performance on CPA is impacted by textbooks. Results revealed that Shanghai textbooks make a positive contribution to students’ learning performance. The findings from this study help to shed light on how those textbooks aid student learning, and provide an example for further reflection on student learning of arithmetic operational properties in different curricula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baroody, A., Berent, R., & Packman, D. (1982). The use of mathematical structure by inner city children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4(2), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A., Ginsburg, H., & Waxman, B. (1983). Children’s use of mathematical structure. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A., & Purpura, D. J. (2017). Early number and operations: Whole numbers. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 308–354). NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A., Wilkins, J., & Tiilikainen, S. (2003). The development of children’s understanding of additive commutativity: From proto quantitative concept to general concept? In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 127–160). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermejo, V., & Rodriguez, P. (1993). Children’s understanding of the commutative law of addition. Learning and Instruction, 3(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisanz, J., & LeFevre, J. (1992). Understanding elementary mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 113–136). Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bisanz, J., Watchorn, R., Piatt, C., & Sherman, J. (2009). On “understanding” children’s developing use of inversion. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazer, C. (2011). Strategies for reducing mathematics anxiety. Information Capsule, 1102. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536509

  • Bokhove, C., Miyazaki, M., Komatsu, K., Chino, K., Leung, A., & Mok, I. A. (2019). The role of “Opportunity to Learn” in the Geometry curriculum: A multilevel comparison of six countries. Frontiers in Education, 4.

  • Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. (Research report No. 00–2). National Center for Improving student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.

  • Ching, B. H. H., & Nunes, T. (2017). Children’s understanding of the commutativity and complement principles: A latent profile analysis. Learning and Instruction, 47, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, L., Wu, S., Chen, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Digital game-based learning in a Shanghai primary-school mathematics class: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 709–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, M., Li, X., Hassler, R., & Barnett, E. (2021). Understanding the properties of operations: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagginger Auer, M. F., Hickendorff, M., Van Putten, C. M., Béguin, A. A., & Heiser, W. J. (2016). Multilevel latent class analysis for large-scale educational assessment data: Exploring the relation between the curriculum and students’ mathematical strategies. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(2), 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Chen, J., Zhu, Y., Qiu, X., & Hu, Q. (2004). Textbook use within and beyond Chinese mathematics classrooms: A study of 12 secondary schools in Kunming and Fuzhou of China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Trouche, L., Qi, C., Rezat, S., & Visnovska, J. (Eds.). (2018). Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, L. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn: Mathematics textbooks and students’ achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, A., Marschick, F., & Lipowsky, F. (2009). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers. Adaptive strategy use and the influence of instruction in German third grade. ZDM – the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41(5), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houang, R. T., & Schmidt, W. H. (2008). TIMSS international curriculum analysis and measuring educational opportunities [Paper presentation]. 3rd IEA International Research Conference.

  • Howe, R. E. (2018). Cultural knowledge for teaching mathematics. In Y. Li, W. J. Lewis, & J. J. Madden (Eds.), Mathematics Matters in Education – Essays in honor of Roger E. Howe (pp. 19–39). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2006). Teacher Guide 4.1. Shanghai Education Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2018a). Real Shanghai Mathematics-Pupil Textbook 1.1. Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2018b). Real Shanghai Mathematics-Pupil Textbook 1.2. Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (2018c). Real Shanghai Mathematics-Pupil Textbook 2.1. Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Huang, R., & Bosch, M. (2021). Analyzing a teacher’s learning through cross-cultural collaboration: A praxeological perspective of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Song, C., & Li, Y. (2020). An exploratory study of second grade students’ learning and using the commutative property of addition in Shanghai. Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(4), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, E., Stephens, A., Blanton, M., & Gardiner, A. (2016). Build an early foundation for algebra success. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(6), 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 37(4), 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullberg, A., & Björklund, C. (2020). Preschoolers’ different ways of structuring part-part-whole relations with finger patterns when solving an arithmetic task. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(4), 767–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ practices and thinking in lesson plan development: A case of teaching fraction division. ZDM – the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41, 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Huang, R. (Eds.). (2013). How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Lappan, G. (Eds.). (2014). Mathematics curriculum in school education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2011). National mathematics curriculum. Beijing Normal University Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count: A policy paper. University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol I). OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol I). OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM, 33(5), 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pu, S., Sun, X., & Li, Y. (2018). How do Chinese teachers acquire and improve their knowledge through intensive textbook studies? In Y. Li & R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese acquire and improve mathematics knowledge for teaching (pp. 165–184). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1992). From protoquantities to operators: Building mathematical competence on a foundation of everyday knowledge. In G. Leinhardt, R. T. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 373–429). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille, D. F., Schmidt, W. H., Raizan, S. A., McKnight, C. C., Britton, C. D., & Nicol, C. (Eds.). (1993). Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science (TIMSS Monograph No. 1). Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D. (2009). Representation-based proof in the elementary grades. In D. A. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective (pp. 71–86). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. American Educator, 26(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (2004). Shanghai elementary and secondary school mathematics curriculum. Shanghai Education Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievert, H., van den Ham, A.-K., Niedermeyer, I., & Heinze, A. (2019). Effects of mathematics textbooks on the development of primary school children’s adaptive expertise in arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievert, H., van den Ham, A.-K., Niedermeyer, I., & Heinze, A. (2021). Are firrst graders’ arithmetic skills related to the quality of mathematics textbooks? A study on students’ use of arithmetic principles. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). NCTM, Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Steenbrugge, H., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2013). Teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series in Flanders: Does it (not) matter which mathematics textbook series schools choose? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 322–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Fan, L. (2021). Investigating students’ perceptions concerning textbook use in mathematics: A comparative study of secondary schools between Shanghai and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(5), 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. J. (2017). The Peano Axioms: An IBL unit constructing the natural numbers. Primus, 27(7), 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Kong, Q., & Cai, J. (2018). Investigating elementary and middle school students’ subjective well-being and mathematical performance in Shanghai. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(Suppl 1), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, H., & Huang, X. (2019). China-England mathematics teacher exchange and its impact. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(3), 480–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Wong, N., & Shi, O. (2018). Textbook use: The interaction between teacher and textbook-inquiry on teachers’ use of mathematics textbooks in Chinese mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Journal of East China Normal University, 36(1), 77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeping Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

 

Textbook

Unit

Contents

Page

Code

Grade one

First semester

Addition and subtraction within 10

Split and combine

21

(P1, C1)

22

(P1, C1)

Addition

23

(P3, C1)

24

(P3, C1)

25

(P3, C1)

List number sentences

60

(P3, C1)

Mathematical amusement

62

(P3, C1)

Second semester

Addition and subtraction within 100

Adding or subtracting a multiple of ten

26

(P1, C2)

(P2, C2)

(P4, C2)

27

(P1, C2)

(P2, C2)

(P4, C2)

Adding or subtracting two-digit numbers

32

(P2, C2)

(P4, C2)

33

(P2, C2)

(P4, C2)

34

(P2, C2)

37

(P2, C2)

(P4, C2)

38

(P2, C2)

Review and improvement

Review addition and subtraction with two-digit

61

(P4, C2)

62

(P4, C2)

64

(P4, C2)

65

(P4, C2)

Exchange

67

(P1, C1)

(P3, C1)

68

(P4, C3)

Grade two

First semester

Review and improvement

Review addition and subtraction with two-digit

2

(P5, C3)

Miss numbers in box

6

(P4, C3)

Second semester

Addition and subtraction with three-digit

Addition with three-digit

28

(P1, C2)

(P4, C2)

Subtraction with three-digit

33

(P1, C2)

(P4, C2)

Review and improvement

Simplifying operation

69

(P5, C3)

70

(P5, C3)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Xiao, Y., Webster, J.S. et al. Exploring Shanghai students’ mathematics learning as related to content presentation in textbooks: the case of the commutative property of addition. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 595–609 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01362-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01362-6

Keywords

Navigation