Skip to main content
Log in

Looking for Reasons to be Good: Mengzi as a Moral Advisor

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay accounts for Mengzi’s 孟子 failure in persuading King Xuan of Qi (Qi Xuan Wang 齊宣王) to act morally. We argue that the distinction between internal and external reasons in contemporary philosophy helps to highlight the nature of the failure. The problem of nontransmission of the compassionate impulse within a person despite moral persuasion, which Mencians need to address in order to enhance the success of moral conversion, is now explained as a result of misdirecting the advisee to the lofty ideal of sagehood. We conclude by proposing a proleptic understanding of external reasons within a pragmatic model of giving moral advice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy 1.” Philosophy 33.124: 1–19.

  • ______. 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Blackburn, Simon. 2001. Ruling Passions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Timothy. 2013. “Sagehood and Supererogation in the Analects.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40.2: 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua, Antonio S. 2001. “Xin and Moral Failure: Reflections on Mencius’ Moral Psychology.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1.1: 31–53.

  • Huang, Yong. 2010. “Confucius and Mencius on the Motivation to be Moral.” Philosophy East and West 60.1: 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2013. “Virtue Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Confucian Conceptions of Moral Praise and Blame.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40.3–4: 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. 2003. Mencius: A Bilingual Edition. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xiusheng. 2002. “Mengzian Internalism.” In Essays on Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • McDowell, John. 1995. “Might There be External Reasons?” In World, Mind, and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, edited by J. E. J. Altham and R. Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pettit, Philip, and Michael Smith. 2006. “External Reasons.” In McDowell and His Critics, edited by Cynthia Macdonald and Graham MacDonald. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Shafer-Landau, R. 1998. “Moral Motivation and Moral Judgment.” Philosophical Quarterly 48: 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shun, Kwong-loi. 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Svavarsdottir, S. 1999. “Moral Cognitivism and Motivation.” Philosophical Review 108: 161–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tresan, J. 2009. “The Challenge of Communal Internalism.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 43: 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Internal and External Reasons.” In Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 1993. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • ______. 1995a. “Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame.” In Making Sense of Humanity, and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 1995b. “Moral Incapacity.” In Making Sense of Humanity, and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 1995c. “Replies.” In World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, edited by J. E. J. Altham and Ross Harrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 1995d. “Who Needs Ethical Knowledge?” In Making Sense of Humanity, and Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 2001. “Postscript: Some Further Notes on Internal and External Reasons.” In Varieties of Practical Reasoning, edited by Elijah Millgram. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Wong, David B. 1991. “Is There a Distinction between Reason and Emotion in Mencius?” Philosophy East and West 41.1: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Yang. 2009. “Agency and Practical Reasoning in the Analects and the Mencius.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36.4: 629–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Young.

Ethics declarations

Declaration

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Young, D., Ming, T. Looking for Reasons to be Good: Mengzi as a Moral Advisor. Dao 22, 555–575 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09906-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09906-7

Keywords

Navigation