Abstract
The theoretical and practical roles of moral principles in principlist theory is the subject of this chapter. I start by discussing the historical background of the emergence of basic universal principles in bioethics. I then analyze the nature of the moral commitments in the universal framework of principles that I have developed over the last 40 years with James Childress. I also discuss how universal principles are fashioned into particular moralities such as those found in professional medical ethics, and the circumstances under which particular moralities are consistent with universal morality. Finally, I show the relevance of principles for global research ethics and for an understanding of the rights of minorities in multicultural societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
World Medical Association (2008, A.2). Today the Declaration is best interpreted in terms of what is set out below as a set of specification of universal moral principles, though no such principles are invoked or even mentioned in the Declaration.
References
Beauchamp, Tom L. 2010. Standing on principles: Collected essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 1979 and 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. 1st & 7th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bloch, Sidney, and Peter Reddaway. 1984. Soviet psychiatric abuse: The shadow over world psychiatry. Boulder: Westview Press.
Bok, Sissela. 1995. Common values. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Daniels, Norman. 1996. Wide reflective equilibrium in practice. In Philosophical perspectives on bioethics, ed. L.W. Sumner and J. Boyle, 96–114. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Engelhardt Jr., H. Tristram. 1996. The foundations of bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, Joel. 1980. Rights, justice, and the bounds of liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gert, Bernard. 2004. Common morality: Deciding what to do. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: DHEW Publication OS 78-0012.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1988. Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. In Ethical theory, character, and virtue, ed. Peter French et al. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Radden, Jennifer. 2002. Notes towards a professional ethics for psychiatry. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36(2002): 52–59.
Richardson, Henry S. 1990. Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(1990): 279–310.
Sen, Amartya. 1997. Human rights and Asian values. New York: Carnegie Council.
Warnock, G.J. 1971. The object of morality. London: Methuen & Co.
World Medical Association. 2014. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, October 2008. Available at http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf. 12 June 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beauchamp, T.L. (2016). Principlism in Bioethics. In: Serna, P., Seoane, JA. (eds) Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 70. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43417-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43419-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)