Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic right versus left colectomy for colorectal neoplasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies comparing right and left colectomies have shown variable short-term outcomes. Despite the rapid adoption of robotics in colorectal operations, few studies have addressed outcome differences between robotic right (RRC) and left (RLC) colectomies. Therefore, we sought to compare the short-term outcomes of RRC and RLC for neoplasia. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published from the time of inception of the datasets to May 1, 2022. The electronic databases included English publications in Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus. A total of 13,514 patients with colon neoplasia enrolled in 9 comparative studies were included. The overall mean age was 64.1 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 9.8), and there was a minor female predominance (52% female vs. 48% male). 8656 (64.0%) underwent RRC and 4858 (36.0%) underwent RLC. The ASA score 1 of − 2 in the LRC group was 37% vs. 21% in the R. Whereas the ASA score 3–4 was 62% in the LRC vs. 76% in RRC. Moreover, the mean of the Charlson Comorbidity Score in the LRC was 4.3 (SD 1.9) vs. 3.1 (SD 2.3) in the RRC. Meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of ileus in RRC (10%) compared to RLC (7%) (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27–1.67). Additionally, operative time was significantly shorter by 22.6 min in RRC versus LRC (95% CI − 37.4–7.8; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RRC and RLC in conversion to open operation, estimated blood loss, wound infection, anastomotic leak, reoperation, readmission, and hospital length of stay. In this only meta-analysis comparing RRC and LRC for colon neoplasia, we found that RRC was independently associated with a shorter operative time but increased risk of ileus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available.

References

  1. Outcomes of right and left colectomy at academic centers. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17983053/. Accessed 10 Dec 2022

  2. Campana JP, Pellegrini PA, Rossi GL, Ojea Quintana G, Mentz RE, Vaccaro CA (2017) Right versus left laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: does side make any difference? Int J Colorectal Dis 32(6):907–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00384-017-2776-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nfonsam V, Aziz H, Pandit V, Khalil M, Jandova J, Joseph B (2016) Analyzing clinical outcomes in laparoscopic right vs. left colectomy in colon cancer patients using the NSQIP database. Cancer Treat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrc.2016.03.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Right-sided versus left-sided colectomies for cancer: surgical outcomes and novel considerations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29121694/. Accessed 10 Dec 2022

  5. Kwaan MR, Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Chow CJ, Rothenberger DA, Habermann EB (2013) Are right-sided colectomy outcomes different from left-sided colectomy outcomes?: study of patients with colon cancer in the ACS NSQIP database. JAMA Surg 148(6):504–510. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMASURG.2013.1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Dang P, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2011) Outcomes of right vs. left colectomy for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):2023–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11605-011-1655-Y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turrado-Rodriguez V et al (2015) Are there differences between right and left colectomies when performed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 30(4):1413–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-015-4345-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Veyrie N et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205(6):785–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2007.06.284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solis-Pazmino PYN (2022) Prospero register of systematic reviews. Prospero. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/export_details_pdf.php. Accessed 20 Aug 2022

  10. Neurology2020144980 357..368_Enhanced Reader

  11. GRADE handbook. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html. Accessed 24 Jun 2021

  12. RStudio | Open source & professional software for data science teams—RStudio. https://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed 24 Jun 2021

  13. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M (2014) Metaprop: a stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 72(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Casillas MA et al (2014) Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. Am J Surg 208(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis BR, Yoo AC, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2014) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(2):211–224. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13753907291035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Sperti P, Belfiori G, Gesuita R, Ghiselli R (2015) Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: a single centers preliminary experience. World J Gastroenterol 21(46):13152–13159. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrara F (2016) Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of colo-rectaladenocarcinoma: laparoscopic and robotic approach. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 42(9):S174–S175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dolejs SC, Waters JA, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL (2017) Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis. Surg Endosc 31(6):2387–2396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5239-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasseri Y et al (2021) Minimally invasive right versus left colectomy for cancer: does robotic surgery mitigate differences in short-term outcomes? J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01310-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mlambo B, Shih IF, Li Y, Wren SM (2022) The impact of operative approach on postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization after colectomy. Surgery (United States) 171(2):320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanitha V, Chetan P, Joshua P, Srinivas K. Robotic colorectal surgery. https://www.sages.org/meetings/annual-meeting/abstracts-archive/robotic-colorectal-surgery-shorter-operative-times-low-conversion-rates-and-excellent-oncologic-yield-a-single-surgeon-retrospective-cohort-study-at-a-high-volume-community-center/

  23. Dixon F, O’Hara R, Ghuman N, Strachan J, Khanna A, Keeler BD (2021) Major colorectal resection is feasible using a new robotic surgical platform: the first report of a case series. Tech Coloproctol 25(3):285–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02366-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seo SHB et al (2021) Prolonged postoperative ileus following right- versus left-sided colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 23(12):3113–3122. https://doi.org/10.1111/CODI.15969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Garfinkle R et al (2020) Are right-sided colectomies for neoplastic disease at increased risk of primary postoperative ileus compared to left-sided colectomies? A coarsened exact matched analysis. Surg Endosc 34(12):5304–5311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07318-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study received no external financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PS-P and YN Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; major role in data acquisition; study concept or design; analysis or interpretation of data. KO, KL, and OT contribute to data acquisition and manuscript revision. OP and LF contribute to the study concept, analysis, and interpretation of data. AW, MM, JC, and MB revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Solis-Pazmino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Disclosures Paola Solis-Pazmino, Kimberly Oka, Kristina La, Orly Termeie, Oscar Ponce, Luis Figueroa, Antonio Weston, Mayara Machry, Jason Cohen, Moshe Barnajian, Yosef Nasseri have no conflicts with interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solis-Pazmino, P., Oka, K., La, K. et al. Robotic right versus left colectomy for colorectal neoplasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Robotic Surg 17, 1907–1915 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01649-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01649-0

Keywords

Navigation