Skip to main content
Log in

Revisional But Not Conversional Gastric Bypass Surgery Increases the Risk of Leaks: Review of 176 Redo out of 932 Consecutive Cases

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Nowadays, surgeons are dealing more and more with patients experiencing failure of a previous bariatric procedure after the worldwide exponential increase of bariatric surgery. Only a few and contradictory studies investigated both outcomes and complications risk factors in this subset population of bariatric patients. We aimed to study a homogeneous population of patients undergoing redo bariatric surgery (REDO-BS) resulting in bypass anatomy to evaluate early postoperative outcomes and identify risk factors of postoperative complications and mortality.

Material and Methods

In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients undergoing REDO-BS from another former bariatric procedure into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGP) to those undergoing primary RYGP. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database.

Results

One hundred thirty-eight conversional bariatric surgery (CBS) cases resulting in RYGP anatomy and 38 RBS cases of pouch resizing (PR) were compared with 756 primary RYGP. There were no statistical significant difference in outcomes between the primary and CBS groups but patients undergoing PR had a significant higher risk of developing a leak than others. CBS complication risk factors were age (OR = 1.05; p = 0.04), operative time, and T2DM (OR = 4.11; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

CBS is safe and leads to similar early postoperative outcomes as primary RYGP whereas the indication for revisional surgery such as PR should be carefully evaluated as it is associated with an increased risk of leak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snow JM, Severson PA. Complications of adjustable gastric banding. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91(6):1249–64. ix

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rohner A, Widmer JD, Klasen J, et al. Long-term outcomes of gastric band removal without additional bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maciejewski ML, Arterburn DE, Van Scoyoc L, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term durability of weight loss. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1046–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iannelli A, Dainese R, Piche T, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(6):821–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aarts E, Koehestanie P, Dogan K, et al. Revisional surgery after failed gastric banding: results of one-stage conversion to RYGB in 195 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1077–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, et al. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vij A, Malapan K, Tsai CC, et al. Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):612–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stefanidis D, Malireddy K, Kuwada T, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4504–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharples AJ, Charalampakis V, Daskalakis M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after revisional bariatric surgery following a failed adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2522–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Wezenbeek MR, van Oudheusden TR, de Zoete JP, et al. Conversion to gastric bypass after either failed gastric band or failed sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernando Santos B, Wallaert JB, Trus TL. Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe? Surg Endosc 2014;28(11):3086–91.

  14. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Hébuterne X, et al. Gastric pouch resizing for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass failure in patients with a dilated pouch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):260–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Borbély Y, Winkler C, Kröll D, et al. Pouch reshaping for significant weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):439–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamdi A, Julien C, Brown P, et al. Midterm outcomes of revisional surgery for gastric pouch and gastrojejunal anastomotic enlargement in patients with weight regain after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2014;24(8):1386–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parikh M, Heacock L, Gagner M. Laparoscopic “gastrojejunal sleeve reduction” as a revision procedure for weight loss failure after roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):650–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. Revision of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1627–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Quezada N, Hernández J, Pérez G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: experience in 50 patients after 1 to 3 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(8):1611–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jennings NA, Boyle M, Mahawar K, et al. Revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2013;23(7):947–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carandina S, Maldonado PS, Tabbara M, et al. Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1085–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Iannelli.

Ethics declarations

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent was not required.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent Statement

Does not apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benois, M., Sebastianelli, L., Morisot, A. et al. Revisional But Not Conversional Gastric Bypass Surgery Increases the Risk of Leaks: Review of 176 Redo out of 932 Consecutive Cases. OBES SURG 28, 2903–2911 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3311-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3311-z

Keywords

Navigation