Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Revisional bariatric procedures are on the rise. The higher complexity of these procedures has been reported to lead to increased risk of complications. The objective of our study was to compare the perioperative risk profile of revisional bariatric surgery with primary bariatric surgery in our experience.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery by three fellowship-trained bariatric surgeons from June 2005 to January 2013 at a center of excellence was reviewed. Patient demographics, type of initial and revisional operation, number of prior gastric surgeries, indications for revision, postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations were recorded. These outcomes were compared between revisional and primary procedures by the Mann–Whitney or Chi square tests.

Results

Of 1,556 patients undergoing bariatric surgery, 102 patients (6.5 %) underwent revisional procedures during the study period. Indications for revisions included inadequate weight loss in 67, failed fundoplications with recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease in 29, and other in 6 cases. Revisional bariatric procedures belonged into four categories: band to sleeve gastrectomy (n = 23), band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 25), fundoplication to bypass (n = 29), and other (n = 25). Revisional procedures were associated with higher rates of readmissions and overall morbidity but no differences in leak rates and mortality compared with primary procedures. Band revisions had similar length of stay with primary procedures and had fewer complications compared with other revisions. Patients undergoing fundoplication to bypass revisions were older, had a higher number of prior gastric procedures, and the highest morbidity (40 %) and reoperation (20 %) rates.

Conclusions

In experienced hands, many revisional bariatric procedures can be accomplished safely, with excellent perioperative outcomes that are similar to primary procedures. As the complexity of the revisional procedure and number of prior surgeries increases, however, so does the perioperative morbidity, with fundoplication revisions to gastric bypass representing the highest risk group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, Nguyen XM, Laugenour K, Lane J (2011) Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg 213:261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spyropoulos C, Kehagias I, Panagiotopoulos S, Mead N, Kalfarentzos F (2010) Revisional bariatric surgery: 13-year experience from a tertiary institution. Arch Surg 145:173–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gagner M (2010) Laparoscopic revisional surgery after malabsorptive procedures in bariatric surgery, more specifically after duodenal switch. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:344–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Meador JG, Doty JM, Kellum JM, Wolfe L, Szucs RA, Turner MA (2001) High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 233:809–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Himpens J, Coromina L, Verbrugghe A, Cadiere GB (2012) Outcomes of revisional procedures for insufficient weight loss or weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 22:1746–1754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nesset EM, Kendrick ML, Houghton SG, Mai JL, Thompson GB, Que FG, Thomsen KM, Larson DR, Sarr MG (2007) A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stefanidis D, Navarro F, Augenstein VA, Gersin KS, Heniford BT (2012) Laparoscopic fundoplication takedown with conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass leads to excellent reflux control and quality of life after fundoplication failure. Surg Endosc 26:3521–3527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gagniere J, Slim K, Launay-Savary MV, Raspado O, Flamein R, Chipponi J (2011) Previous gastric banding increases morbidity and gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. J Visc Surg 148:e205–e209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA (2012) Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc 26:1509–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berende CA, de Zoete JP, Smulders JF, Nienhuijs SW (2012) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy feasible for bariatric revision surgery. Obes Surg 22:330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Ragot E, Liagre A, Anduze Y, Msika S, Gugenheim J (2009) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg 19:1216–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goitein D, Feigin A, Segal-Lieberman G, Goitein O, Papa MZ, Zippel D (2011) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional option after gastric band failure. Surg Endosc 25:2626–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foletto M, Prevedello L, Bernante P, Luca B, Vettor R, Francini-Pesenti F, Scarda A, Brocadello F, Motter M, Famengo S, Nitti D (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rebibo L, Mensah E, Verhaeghe P, Dhahri A, Cosse C, Diouf M, Regimbeau JM (2012) Simultaneous gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy: a comparison with front-line sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 22:1420–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hii MW, Lake AC, Kenfield C, Hopkins GH (2012) Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term follow-up and technical considerations. Obes Surg 22:1022–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP (2004) Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients. Obes Surg 14:1349–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Wageningen B, Berends FJ, Van Ramshorst B, Janssen IF (2006) Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 16:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spivak H, Beltran OR, Slavchev P, Wilson EB (2007) Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21:1388–1392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore R, Perugini R, Czerniach D, Gallagher-Dorval K, Mason R, Kelly JJ (2009) Early results of conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gagne DJ, Dovec E, Urbandt JE (2011) Laparoscopic revision of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of 105 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:493–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Bazi M, Cadiere B, Vouche M, Capelluto E, Dapri G (2011) Are laparoscopic gastric bypass after gastroplasty and primary laparoscopic gastric bypass similar in terms of results? Obes Surg 21:692–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Dessel E, Hubens G, Ruppert M, Balliu L, Weyler J, Vaneerdeweg W (2008) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a re-do procedure for failed restricive gastric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:1014–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deylgat B, D’Hondt M, Pottel H, Vansteenkiste F, Van Rooy F, Devriendt D (2012) Indications, safety, and feasibility of conversion of failed bariatric surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective comparative study with primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 26:1997–2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Apers JA, Wens C, van Vlodrop V, Michiels M, Ceulemans R, van Daele G, Jacobs I (2013) Perioperative outcomes of revisional laparoscopic gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding and after vertical banded gastroplasty: experience with 107 cases and subgroup analysis. Surg Endosc 27:558–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ibele A, Garren M, Gould J (2012) The impact of previous fundoplication on laparoscopic gastric bypass outcomes: a case-control evaluation. Surg Endosc 26:177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raftopoulos I, Awais O, Courcoulas AP, Luketich JD (2004) Laparoscopic gastric bypass after antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in morbidly obese patients: initial experience. Obes Surg 14:1373–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kellogg TA, Andrade R, Maddaus M, Slusarek B, Buchwald H, Ikramuddin S (2007) Anatomic findings and outcomes after antireflux procedures in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Houghton SG, Nelson LG, Swain JM, Nesset EM, Kendrick ML, Thompson GB, Murr MM, Nichols FC, Sarr MG (2005) Is Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safe after previous antireflux surgery? Technical feasibility and postoperative symptom assessment. Surg Obes Relat Dis 1:475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Makris KI, Lee T, Mittal SK (2009) Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2226–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Dimitrios Stefanidis has received honoraria for speaking engagements with W.L. Gore and Davol and has Ethicon grant support. Dr. Keith Gersin is a consultant and has ownership interest with GI Dynamics Inc. and has received honoraria for speaking engagements with W.L. Gore and Cadence Pharma. Dr. Timothy Kuwada has received honoraria for speaking engagements with W.L. Gore and Davol. Drs. Kishore Malireddy, Ryan Phillips, and Evan Zoog have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Stefanidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stefanidis, D., Malireddy, K., Kuwada, T. et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure. Surg Endosc 27, 4504–4510 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3097-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3097-y

Keywords

Navigation