Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Imatinib on Survival and Treatment Trends for Small Bowel and Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

  • 2019 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to assess treatment trends and overall survival (OS) in small bowel (SB) and colorectal (CR) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with respect to the introduction of imatinib in 2008.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with SB and CR GIST were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004–2015). The primary outcome was 5- and 10-year OS. Patients were stratified by tumor site, time period (before and after imatinib), and treatment type. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A total of 8441 cases were included (SB 81.66%; CR 18.34%). Radical resection was the most common treatment (SB 42.33%; CR 38.69%). The addition of chemotherapy to radical resection for SB GIST increased between the two time periods (31.76 to 40.43%; p < 0.001), and was associated with improved unadjusted and adjusted OS (2009–2015: adjusted HR [AHR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.59–0.89, p = 0.002). Patients with SB GIST had better 5- and 10-year OS compared with CR (SB 69.83% and 47.68%; CR 61.33% and 45.39%; p < 0.001), even after stratifying by treatment type and tumor size and adjusting for other factors (SB 5-year AHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.19–1.53; 10-year AHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09–1.38; each p < 0.001).

Conclusion

CR GIST are associated with lower OS than SB GIST. Radical resection is the most common treatment type for both sites. Chemotherapy with radical resection offers better OS in SB GIST, but not in CR GIST. Further studies are needed to assess the biology of CR GIST to explain the worse OS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miettinen, M. and J. Lasota, Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch, 2001. 438(1): p. 1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tran, T., J.A. Davi,la, and H.B. El-Serag, The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1,458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005. 100(1): p. 162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soreide, K., et al., Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol, 2016. 40: p. 39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Corless, C.L., J.A. Fletch,er, and M.C. Heinrich, Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol, 2004. 22(18): p. 3813–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma, G.L., et al., Epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of histology codes: results of a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2015. 24(1): p. 298–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miettinen, M., et al., Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol, 2006. 30(4): p. 477–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miettinen, M., L.H. Sob,in, and J. Lasota, Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005. 29(1): p. 52–68.

  8. Scarpa, M., et al., A systematic review on the clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol, 2008. 98(5): p. 384–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshikawa, K., et al., Efficacy of PET-CT for predicting the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Today, 2013. 43(10): p. 1162–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, M.H., et al., MRI features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014. 203(5): p. 980–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fletcher, C.D., et al., Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol, 2002. 33(5): p. 459–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin, B.P., et al., Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010. 134(2): p. 165–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeMatteo, R.P., et al., Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg, 2000. 231(1): p. 51–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Joensuu, H. and R.P. DeMatteo, The management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a model for targeted and multidisciplinary therapy of malignancy. Annu Rev Med, 2012. 63: p. 247–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blanke, C.D., et al., Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(4): p. 620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeMatteo, R.P., et al., Long-term results of adjuvant imatinib mesylate in localized, high-risk, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ACOSOG Z9000 (Alliance) intergroup phase 2 trial. Ann Surg, 2013. 258(3): p. 422–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ingram, I. FDA Grants Imatinib (Gleevec) Full Approval for Adjuvant Treatment of GIST. 2012 [cited 2018 11/1/18]; Available from: http://www.cancernetwork.com/gastrointestinal-stromal-tumor/fda-grants-imatinib-gleevec-full-approval-adjuvant-treatment-gist​. Accessed May 1 2019.

  18. Sepe, P.S. and W.R. Brugge, A guide for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009. 6(6): p. 363–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. National Cancer Database. 2018; Available from: https://www.facs.org/qualityprograms/cancer/ncdb. Accessed April 30 2019.

  20. Census regions and divisions of the United States. 2017; Available from: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf. Accessed April 30 2019.

  21. DeMatteo RP, MR, Agulnik M, et al.. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th, Amin MB (Ed), AJCC, Chicago 2017. p.523. Corrected at 4th printing, 2018.

  22. Demetri, G.D., et al., NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2010. 8 Suppl 2: p. S1–41; quiz S42–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Group, Y.N.W, Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol, 2012. 23 Suppl 7: p. vii 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Joensuu, H., et al., Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol, 2012. 13(3): p. 265–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng, F., et al., Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: evaluation of a pooled case series. Oncotarget, 2016. 7(26): p. 40735–40745.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hassan, I., et al., Clinical, pathologic, and immunohistochemical characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the colon and rectum: implications for surgical management and adjuvant therapies. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006. 49(5): p. 609–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Belfiori, G., et al., Risk stratification systems for surgically treated localized primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST). Review of literature and comparison of the three prognostic criteria: MSKCC Nomogramm, NIH-Fletcher and AFIP-Miettinen. Ann Ital Chir, 2015. 86(3): p. 219–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, P.C., et al., Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib (STI-571) era. Surgery, 2003. 134(4): p. 656–65; discussion 665-6.

  29. Cavnar, M.J., et al., Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in the Era of Imatinib: Organ Preservation and Improved Oncologic Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017. 24(13): p. 3972–3980.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fernandes Gdos, S., et al., Perioperative treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncology (Williston Park), 2009. 23(1): p. 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rutkowski, P., et al., Neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): the EORTC STBSG experience. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(9): p. 2937–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, J.P., et al., The role of neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate therapy in sphincter-preserving procedures for anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Am J Clin Oncol, 2011. 34(3): p. 314–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkinson, M.J., et al., Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the rectum in the era of imatinib. Br J Surg, 2015. 102(8): p. 965–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, H., et al., Treatment strategy of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Surg Oncol, 2014. 109(7): p. 708–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, H.Y., et al., A modification of NIH consensus criteria to better distinguish the highly lethal subset of primary localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a subdivision of the original high-risk group on the basis of outcome. Surgery, 2007. 141(6): p. 748–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dematteo, R.P., et al., Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2009. 373(9669): p. 1097–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Joensuu, H., et al., One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2012. 307(12): p. 1265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin, J.X., et al., Is 3-years duration of adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment sufficient for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor? A study based on long-term follow-up. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2017. 143(4): p. 727–734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Raut, C.P., et al., Efficacy and Tolerability of 5-Year Adjuvant Imatinib Treatment for Patients With Resected Intermediate- or High-Risk Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: The PERSIST-5 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol, 2018. 4(12): p. e184060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jakob, J., et al., Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum: results of surgical and multimodality therapy in the era of imatinib. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(2): p. 586–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li, Y. and X. Meng, The efficacy of adjuvant imatinib therapy in improving the prognosis of patients with colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2015. 97(3): p. 215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Corless, C.L., et al., Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol, 2014. 32(15): p. 1563–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Heinrich, M.C., et al., Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol, 2003. 21(23): p. 4342–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Oppelt, P.J., A.C. Hirbe, and B.A. Van Tine, Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): point mutations matter in management, a review. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2017. 8(3): p. 466–473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Du, C.Y., et al., The analysis of status and clinical implication of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Surg Oncol, 2008. 98(3): p. 175–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Medeiros, F., et al., KIT-negative gastrointestinal stromal tumors: proof of concept and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg Pathol, 2004. 28(7): p. 889–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen, C.W., et al., Surgical management and clinical outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the colon and rectum. Z Gastroenterol, 2008. 46(8): p. 760–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dong, C., et al., Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the rectum: Clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemical characteristics and prognostic analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2007. 42(10): p. 1221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Randleman, C.D., Jr., et al., Leiomyosarcoma of the rectum and anus. A series of 22 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis, 1989. 4(2): p. 91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Logrono, R., et al., Recent advances in cell biology, diagnosis, and therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer Biol Ther, 2004. 3(3): p. 251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chok, A.Y., et al., A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014. 21(11): p. 3429–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Colombo, C., et al., Clinical, pathological and surgical characteristics of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor and their influence on survival: a multi-center study. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012. 19(11): p. 3361–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Duffaud, F., et al., Conservative surgery vs. duodeneopancreatectomy in primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a retrospective review of 114 patients from the French sarcoma group (FSG). Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014. 40(10): p. 1369–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnston, F.M., et al., Presentation and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012. 19(11): p. 3351–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tien, Y.W., et al., Surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010. 17(1): p. 109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Mr. Edwin Lewis provided generous support of Dr. Efron’s Department of Surgery Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Almaazmi: concept and design of the work, data acquisition, interpretation of data, drafting and revising the work, final approval. Mrs. Stem: design of the work, data acquisition and analysis, interpretation of data, drafting and revising the work, final approval. Mr. Lo and Dr. Taylor: design of the work, interpretation of data, drafting and revising the work, final approval. Dr. Fang and Dr. Safar: interpretation of data, revising the work, final approval. Dr. Efron: design of the work, data acquisition, interpretation of data, revising the work, final approval. Dr. Atallah: concept and design of the work, interpretation of data, revising the work, final approval. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chady Atallah.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimers

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC’s NCDB and the hospitals participating in the CoC NCDB are the sources of the de-identified data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presentations

This abstract was presented as a Quick Shot Presentation at Digestive Disease Weekly, May 18–21, 2019, San Diego, CA, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almaazmi, H., Stem, M., Lo, B.D. et al. The Impact of Imatinib on Survival and Treatment Trends for Small Bowel and Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 98–108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04344-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04344-4

Keywords

Navigation