Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary Single-Center Surgical Experiences in Redo Procedures of the Pancreas: Improved Outcome and Reduction of Operative Risk

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Redo procedures of the pancreas are complex operations associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The operative risk may be minimised when indications for redo procedure are well reflected and operation is performed by an experienced surgeon. The aim of this study was to confirm this hypothesis evaluating our experiences with redo procedures.

Methods

We reviewed 28 patients (mean age of 54 years; range 11–75 years) undergoing a redo procedure of the pancreas from January 2004 to June 2008 at our hospital. The term redo procedure was defined as a pancreatic reoperation that was carried out after preceding pancreatic surgery. Relaparotomies following acute complications after pancreatic surgery were not taken into consideration.

Results

The following parameters were evaluated: median operative time 332 min (range 160–730 min), median intraoperative blood loss 625 ml (range 300–2,800 ml), median postoperative stay on Intensive Care Unit 20 h (range 0–112 h), median postoperative hospital stay 15 days (range 7–98), morbidity (14%), and mortality (3.6%).

Conclusions

Redo procedures of the pancreas can be performed with low complication rates. In order to achieve a satisfactory outcome, the indication of redo procedures has to be well reflected, and operation may be performed by specialised and experienced surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schnelldorfer T, Lewin DN, Adams DB. Reoperative surgery for chronic pancreatitis: is it safe? World J Surg 2006;30(7):1321–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Huang JJ, Hruban RH, Yeo C. Reexploration for periampullary carcinoma: resectability, perioperative results, pathology, and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 1999;229(3):393–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tyler DS, Evans DB. Reoperative pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219(2):211–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McGuire GE, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Niederhuber JE, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Reoperative surgery for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg 1991;126(10):1205–10; discussion 1210–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shukla PJ, Qureshi SS, Shrikhande SV, Jagannath P, Desouza LJ. Reoperative pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 2005;75(7):520–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleeff J, Reiser C, Hinz U, Bachmann J, Debus J, Jaeger D, Friess H, Buchler MW. Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;245(4):566–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams DB, Ford MC, Anderson MC. Outcome after lateral pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1994;219(5):481–7; discussion 487–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutchins RR, Hart RS, Pacifico M, Bradley NJ, Williamson RC. Long-term results of distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis in 90 patients. Ann Surg 2002;236(5):612–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell RC, Theis BA. Pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. World J Surg 2003;27(11):1203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Markowitz JS, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Failure of symptomatic relief after pancreaticojejunal decompression for chronic pancreatitis. Strategies for salvage. Arch Surg 1994;129(4):374–9; discussion 379–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prinz RA, Aranha GV, Greenlee HB. Redrainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1986;151(1):150–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Camargo CA Jr, Croxford R, Langer B, Levy GA, Greig PD. Definition and classification of negative outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Application in liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1994;220(2):109–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Mentha G, Borst F, Buhler L, Roche B, Cywes R, Tibshirani R, Rohner A, Strasberg SM. Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors. Ann Surg 1992;216(6):618–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992;111(5):518–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments. Gastroenterology 2001;120(3):682–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koninger J, Friess H, Muller M, Wirtz M, Martignioni M, Buchler MW. Duodenum-preserving pancreas head resection-an operative technique for retaining the organ in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Chirurg 2004;75(8):781–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schnelldorfer T, Lewin DN, Adams DB. Operative management of chronic pancreatitis: long term results in 372 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204(5):1039–45; discussion 1045–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Imrie CW. Management of recurrent pain following previous surgery for chronic pancreatitis. World J Sur 1990;14(1):88–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979;301(25):1364–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005;242(6):781–8, discussion 788–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349(22):2117–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waldemar Uhl.

Additional information

Data were presented at the annual congress of the German Society for Surgery in April 2008 in Berlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kersting, S., Janot, M.S., Chromik, A.M. et al. Contemporary Single-Center Surgical Experiences in Redo Procedures of the Pancreas: Improved Outcome and Reduction of Operative Risk. J Gastrointest Surg 15, 191–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1384-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1384-7

Keywords

Navigation