Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Potential value of the PixelShine deep learning algorithm for increasing quality of 70 kVp+ASiR-V reconstruction pelvic arterial phase CT images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm, PixelShine (PS), on the quality of 70 kVp pelvic arterial phase CT images.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on arterial phase pelvic CT images from 33 patients (body-mass index ≤ 20 kg/m2) obtained with a GE Revolution CT (70 kVp tube voltage; adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo-filtered back projection, 50% blending) and designated group A. Group B images were then obtained by applying PS to group A image datasets. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two radiologists with a 5-point scoring system; the scores of the groups were compared. Image signal was assessed using CT values of the urinary bladder. CT and standard deviation (SD) values of the gluteus maximus were measured, and SD values of the gluteus maximus were used to represent image noise. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the bladder were calculated. Image noise, SNR, and CNR of two groups were compared using paired t-tests.

Results

The subjective visual image quality scores of groups A and B, respectively, were 3.11 ± 0.30 vs. 3.82 ± 0.57; image noise was 15.79 ± 2.05 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 11.06 ± 2.22 HU; SNRs of bladder were 0.50 ± 0.23 vs. 0.79 ± 0.39; and CNRs of bladder were 3.72 ± 0.85 vs. 5.14 ± 1.27. Group B showed better subjective image quality, lower image noise, and improved SNR and CNR, compared to group A; these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The noise of group B was approximately 30% lower than that of group A; the SNR and CNR values of group B were improved by approximately 58% and 38%, respectively.

Conclusion

Using 70 kVp +ASiR-V, PS can improve the image quality of pelvic arterial phase CT images, significantly reduce the image noise, and improve the SNR and CNR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schreiner MM, Platzgummer H, Unterhumer S, et al. A BMI-adjusted ultra-low-dose CT angiography protocol for the peripheral arteries-Image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benz MR, Szucs-Farkas Z, Froehlich JM, et al. Scan time adapted contrast agent injection protocols with low volume for low-tube voltage CT angiography: An in vitro study. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:65–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim K, Kwon H, Cho J, et al. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39(3):443–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasegawa A. “Noise reduction processing by AI—PixelShine”, Innervision, vol. 32, pp 31–34 (in Japanese).

  5. Cross NM, DeBerry J, Ortiz D, Kemp J, Morey J. “Diagnostic quality of machine learning algorithm for optimization of low-dose computed tomography data”, Society For Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM; June 1–3. PA): Pittsburgh; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nagaraj Y, van Den Oever LB, Guo J, Oudkerk M, van Ooijen PM. Perceived quality measurement of low-dose lung CT after retrospective neural network image enhancement. European Society of Thoracic Imaging, ESCR, May 24-26, Geneva, Switzerland; 2018.

  7. Pinho DF, Kulkarni NM, Krishnaraj A, et al. Initial experience with single-source dual-energy CT abdominal angiography and comparison with single-energy CT angiography: image quality, enhancement, diagnosis and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):351–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. André F, Fortner P, Vembar M, et al. Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(3):213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsura M, Sato J, Akahane M, et al. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:243–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Higaki T, Tatsugami F, Fujioka C, et al. Visualization of simulated small vessels on computed tomography using a model-based iterative reconstruction technique. Data Brief. 2017;13:437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benz DC, Gräni C, Mikulicic F, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V: impact on image quality in ultralow-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016;40(6):958–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HG, Lee HJ, Lee SK, et al. Head CT: Image quality improvement with ASIR-V using a reduced radiation dose protocol for children. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(9):3609–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yijun LIU, Ailian LIU, Xin FANG, et al. Feasibility of low radiation dose and iodine contrast medium in 70kVp abdominal CTA in low body mass index patients. Chin J Med Imaging Technol. 2017;33(3):473–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, et al. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1054):20150463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No. 222 Zhongshan Road, Xigang District, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China

    Shi-feng Tian, Ai-lian Liu, Jing-hong Liu & Yi-jun Liu

  2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA

    Ju-dong Pan

Authors
  1. Shi-feng Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ai-lian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing-hong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi-jun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ju-dong Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ai-lian Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Sf., Liu, Al., Liu, Jh. et al. Potential value of the PixelShine deep learning algorithm for increasing quality of 70 kVp+ASiR-V reconstruction pelvic arterial phase CT images. Jpn J Radiol 37, 186–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0798-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0798-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation