Skip to main content
Log in

Pazopanib: a Review in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Targeted Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pazopanib (Votrient®), an orally administered multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that predominantly inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, −2 and −3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α and -β, and the stem cell factor receptor c-Kit, is approved in the EU, the USA and other countries for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In randomized controlled trials in patients with advanced, predominantly clear-cell RCC, pazopanib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in both treatment-naïve and cytokine-pretreated patients and, as a first-line therapy, was noninferior to intermittent sunitinib with respect to PFS. However, pazopanib had a tolerability profile that was distinguishable from that of sunitinib, based on lower incidences of most adverse events, particularly those associated with discomfort, such as fatigue, hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis. Consistent with this, health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measures evaluating fatigue, hand/foot soreness and mouth/throat soreness significantly favoured pazopanib over sunitinib. In addition, significantly more patients expressed a preference for pazopanib over sunitinib, primarily because of better overall HR-QOL and less fatigue. Efficacy and tolerability findings from these prospective clinical trials have been substantiated by evidence from a number of retrospective studies evaluating unselected real-world patients with metastatic RCC who received pazopanib (or sunitinib) as a first-line therapy. Thus, data from clinical trials supplemented with that from clinical practice support the use of pazopanib as a standard or alternative first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic RCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stukalin I, Alimohamed N, Heng DYC. Contemporary treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rev. 2016;10(1):295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack PL. Pazopanib: a review of its use in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Drugs. 2014;74(10):1111–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. European Medicines Agency. Votrient (pazopanib) 200 mg film-coated tablet: summary of product characteristics. 2016. http://www.ema.europa.eu. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Votrient (pazopanib) tablets: US prescribing information. 2016. https://www.pharma.us.novartis.com. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  5. Keisner SV, Shah SR. Pazopanib: the newest tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Drugs. 2011;71(4):443–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar R, Knick VB, Rudolph SK, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation from mouse to human with pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor with potent antitumor and antiangiogenic activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(7):2012–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar R, Crouthamel MC, Rominger DH, et al. Myelosuppression and kinase selectivity of multikinase angiogenesis inhibitors. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(10):1717–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hurwitz HI, Dowlati A, Saini S, et al. Phase I trial of pazopanib in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):4220–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shetty AV, Matrana MR, Atkinson BJ, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and end-stage renal disease receiving dialysis and targeted therapies: a single institution experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014;12(5):348–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu C-F, Xue Z, Bing N, et al. Concomitant use of pazopanib and simvastatin increases the risk of transaminase elevations in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(9):2470–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):1061–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sternberg CN, Hawkins RE, Wagstaff J, et al. A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final overall survival results and safety update. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1287–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cella D, Pickard AS, Duh MS, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving pazopanib or placebo in a randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(3):311–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):722–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, McCann L, et al. Overall survival in renal-cell carcinoma with pazopanib versus sunitinib. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1769–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beaumont JL, Salsman JM, Diaz J, et al. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016;122(7):1108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, et al. Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1412–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hutson TE, Davis ID, Machiels J-PH, et al. Efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):475–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JH, Park I, Lee JL. Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;78(2):325–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruiz-Morales JM, Swierkowski M, Wells JC, et al. First-line sunitinib versus pazopanib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database Consortium. Eur J Cancer. 2016;65:102–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chow S, Pillai MR, Galvis V, et al. 10 year outcomes from a single-centre experience of sunitinib and pazopanib as first-line treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) [abstract no. e16085]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl)

  22. Hirsch BR, Jiao X, Wilson T, et al. Comparative effectiveness of pazopanib and sunitinib as first-line therapy for patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a U.S. community oncology setting [abstract no. 567]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl 2)

  23. Lalani A-K, Li H, Heng D, et al. Real world outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) using first-line sunitinib or pazopanib: the Canadian experience [abstract]. In: 41st European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; 2016.

  24. Vogelzang NJ, Hackshaw MD, Hutson TE, et al. First-line and sequential use of pazopanib followed by mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor therapy among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in a US community oncology setting. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015;13(3):210–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matrana M, Bathala T, Campbell M, et al. Outcomes of unselected patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line pazopanib therapy followed by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors: a single institution experience. BJU Int. 2016;118(2):264–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez-Valderrama B, Arranz Arija JA, Rodriguez Sanchez A, et al. Validation of the international metastatic renal-cell carcinoma database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model for first-line pazopanib in metastatic renal carcinoma: the Spanish oncologic genitourinary group (SOGUG) SPAZO study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(4):706–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez AR, Domínguez RG, de Velasco G, et al. Pazopanib in metastatic renal carcinoma (mRC): experience of 31 centers in Spain in first, second, third, or subsequent lines in daily clinical practice [abstract no. e15609]. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(Suppl).

  28. Kim MJ, Park SH, Lee JL, et al. A Korean multi-center, real-world, retrospective study of first-line pazopanib in unselected patients with metastatic renal clear-cell carcinoma. BMC Urol. 2016;16(1):46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Galvis V, Chow S, Lawrence D, et al. Clinical practice outcomes of patients treated with pazopanib for metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) – 6 year experience at a referral centre in Manchester, UK [abstract no. 2763]. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(Suppl 2)

  30. Jain A, Canipari C, Haque F, et al. Liver toxicity associated with the use of pazopanib in renal cancer patients: UK teaching hospital experience [abstract no. 2604]. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(Suppl 3):S513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cecere SC, Rossetti S, Cavaliere C, et al. Pazopanib in metastatic renal cancer: a “real-world” experience at National Cancer Institute “Fondazione G. Pascale”. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:287.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith T, Maclean E, Mardekian J, et al. Real world outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib as first line therapy in the United States [abstract]. In: 15th International Kidney Cancer Symposium; 2016.

  33. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Deen KC, et al. An open-label extension study to evaluate safety and efficacy of pazopanib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Oncology. 2014;87(6):342–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Powles T, Bracarda S, Chen M, et al. Characterisation of liver chemistry abnormalities associated with pazopanib monotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials in advanced cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(10):1293–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Greef B, Eisen T. Medical treatment of renal cancer: new horizons. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(5):505–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl 5):v58–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma. 2016. http://uroweb.org/guideline/renal-cell-carcinoma/. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  38. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: kidney cancer (version 2.2017). 2016. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.

  39. Sun M, Larcher A, Karakiewicz PI. Optimal first-line and second-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: current evidence. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. 2014;7:401–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Iacovelli R, Verzoni E, De Braud F, et al. First line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: two standards with different toxicity profile. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;15(1):19–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kattan MW, Sternberg CN, Mehmud F, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for progression-free survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with pazopanib. Oncology. 2015;89(4):235–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Motzer RJ, Bukowski RM, Figlin RA, et al. Prognostic nomogram for sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2008;113(7):1552–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jung KS, Cho J, Yoo KH, et al. Pazopanib for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with non-clear cell histology: single-arm, open label, multicenter, phase II study [abstract no. 577]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl 2).

  44. Buti S, Bersanelli M, Maines F, et al. First-line pazopanib in non-clear cell renal carcinoma: the Italian retrospective multicenter PANORAMA study [abstract no. e16081]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(Suppl)

  45. Matrana MR, Baiomy A, Campbell M, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with pazopanib. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;15(2):e205–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Costello BA, Ho TH, Tan W, et al. Phase II efficacy trial of pazopanib in non-clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (PINCR trial) [abstract no. TPS4606]. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(Suppl 5)

  47. Goebell P, Doehn C, Grullich C, et al. The PAZOREAL non-interventional study to assess efficacy and safety of pazopanib and everolimus in the changing metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment landscape [abstract]. In: 41st European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; 2016.

  48. Kattan MW, van der Graaf WT, Powles T, et al. Development of a prognostic nomogram for liver toxicity in patients treated with pazopanib [abstract]. In: American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; 2017.

  49. Xu C-F, Johnson T, Wang X, et al. HLA-B*57:01 confers susceptibility to pazopanib-associated liver injury in patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(6):1371–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Motzer RJ, Johnson T, Choueiri TK, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia in pazopanib or sunitinib-treated patients in COMPARZ is associated with UGT1A1 polymorphisms. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2927–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Byfield SA, McPheeters JT, Burton TM, et al. Persistence and compliance among U.S. patients receiving pazopanib or sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective claims analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21(6):515–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Garofalo D, Montgomery J, Drenning J, et al. Patterns of care in renal cell carcinoma: comparison of treatment duration for first-line sunitinib and pazopanib [abstract no. e17615]. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(Suppl).

  53. MacLean E, Mardekian J, Cisar LA, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and costs for patients with renal cell carcinoma initiating treatment with sunitinib and pazopanib. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22(8):979–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Racsa PN, Whisman TR, Worley K. Comparing two tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in Medicare and commercially insured patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(10):1933–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Capri S, Porta C, Delea T. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma from an Italian national health service perspective. Clin Ther. 2017;39(3):567–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Espinosa J, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Maroto P, et al. Cost-utility analysis of pazopanib verses sunitinib as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) in Spain [abstract no. PCN107]. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A632–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Delea TE, Amdahl J, Diaz J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for renal cancer in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21(1):46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Villa G, Hernandez-Pastor L-J. Budget impact analysis of first-line treatment with pazopanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Spain. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hansen RN, Hackshaw MD, Nagar SP, et al. Health care costs among renal cancer patients using pazopanib and sunitinib. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21(1):37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. MacLean EA, Sandin R, Mardekian J. Health care costs among renal cancer patients using pazopanib and sunitinib. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21(9):841–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vogelzang NJ, Pal SK, Ghate S, et al. Real-world economic outcomes among patients (pts) who initiated sunitinib or pazopanib as first targeted therapy (TT) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): a retrospective analysis of Medicare data [abstract]. In: American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

During the peer review process, the manufacturer of pazopanib was also offered an opportunity to review this article. Changes resulting from comments received were made on the basis of scientific and editorial merit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Frampton.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

James Frampton is a salaried employee of Adis/Springer, is responsible for the article content and declares no relevant conflicts of interest.Additional information about this Adis Drug Review can be found at http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/E798F0600EAF9B8A

Additional information

The manuscript was reviewed by: A. Alva, Department of Internal Medicine, Haematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, MI, USA; M.W. Kattan, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; C.C. Porta, Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frampton, J.E. Pazopanib: a Review in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Targ Oncol 12, 543–554 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-017-0511-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-017-0511-8

Navigation