Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil acidification induced by intensive agricultural use depending on climate

  • Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Soil acidification is a major issue in agricultural ecosystems. However, how agricultural land uses shape the soil pH pattern and affect soil acidification on a regional scale are still poorly understood. The research aims to investigate the influences of typical agricultural practices on soil acidification across different climate zones of eastern China.

Materials and methods

Soil samples were collected from 240 sites and 3 land uses per site (uplands, paddies, and adjacent woodlands) across four climate zones (mid-temperate, warm temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions) of eastern China. Soil pH was quantified for each soil samples. The mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) at each site were also analyzed.

Results and discussion

Climate was significantly associated with soil acidification. The differences in soil pH between adjacent land use types ranged from 0.02 to 1.12, whereas those between climate zones ranged from 0.34 to 2.22. Alkaline soils (cooler climates) exhibited a stronger acidification pace than acidic soils (warmer climates). Uplands resulted in alarming decrease in soil pH by 1.12 units relative to adjacent woodlands in mid-temperate zone, which may be induced by the dramatic loss of soil carbon. Acidification of uplands was stronger than that of paddies, owing to higher soil nitrification and carbon mineralization. Croplands had higher soil pH than adjacent woodlands only in the subtropics, indicating that agricultural practices in this zone were effective to retard soil acidification.

Conclusion

We demonstrated, for the first time, the direction and intensity of the differences in soil pH levels among adjacent agricultural lands and woodlands depending on climate. As the two common agricultural croplands across eastern China, uplands have stronger acidification relative to paddies, particularly in the mid-temperate zone. Proper agricultural management practices to avoid carbon losses and preserve the flooding status of paddies should be considered to resist acidification of cropland soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowman WD, Cleveland CC, Halada Ĺ, Hreško J, Baron JS (2008) Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nat Geosci 1:767–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Hu Y, Xia Y, Zheng S, Ma C, Rui Y, He H, Huang D, Zhang Z, Ge T, Wu J, Guggenberger G, Kuzyakov Y, Su Y (2021) Contrasting pathways of carbon sequestration in paddy and upland soils. Glob Change Biol 27:2478–2490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conyers MK, Davey BG (1988) Observations on some routine methods for soil pH determination. Soil Sci 145:29–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng S, Zheng X, Chen X, Zheng S, He X, Ge T, Kuzyakov Y, Wu J, Su Y, Hu Y (2021) Divergent mineralization of hydrophilic and hydrophobic organic substrate and their priming effect in soils depending on their preferential utilization by bacteria and fungi. Biol Fert Soils 57:65–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding C, Du S, Ma Y, Li X, Zhang T, Wang X (2019) Changes in the pH of paddy soils after flooding and drainage: modeling and validation. Geoderma 337:511–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding KWT (2019) Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use Manag 32:390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Liu X, Zhang Y, Shen J, Han W, Zhang W, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang F (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kögel-Knabner I, Amelung W, Cao Z, Fiedler S, Frenzel P, Jahn R, Kalbitz K, Kölbl A, Schloter M (2010) Biogeochemistry of paddy soils. Geoderma 157:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Cui S, Chang S, Zhang Q (2019) Liming effects on soil pH and crop yield depend on lime material type, application method and rate, and crop species: a global meta-analysis. J Soil Sediment 19:1393–1406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Fang Y, Yu F, Liu Q, Li F, Peng S (2010) Soil acidification in response to acid deposition in three Subtropical forests of subtropical China. Pedosphere 20:399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raza S, Miao N, Wang P, Ju X, Chen Z, Zhou J, Kuzyakov Y (2020) Dramatic loss of inorganic carbon by nitrogen-induced soil acidification in Chinese croplands. Glob Change Biol 26:3738–3751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahrawat KL (2005) Fertility and organic matter in submerged rice soil. Curr Sci 88:735–739

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi R, Liu Z, Li Y, Jiang T, Xu M, Li J, Xu R (2019) Mechanisms for increasing soil resistance to acidification by long-term manure application. Soil till Res 185:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Xu J, Liu X, Zhang D, Li L, Li W, Sheng L (2019) Effects of long-term application of organic fertilizer on improving organic matter content and retarding acidity in red soil from China. Soil till Res 195:104382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Zhu Q, Ros G, Cai Z, Wen S, Xu M, Zhang F, de Vries W (2022) Calculation of spatially explicit amounts and intervals of agricultural lime applications at county-level in China. Sci Total Environ 806:150955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Zhao A, Yuan J, Jiang J (2012) pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars. J Soil Sediment 12:494–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu T (1985) Physical Chemistry of Paddy Soils. Science Press and Springer-verlag, Beijing-Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamanian K, Zarebanadkouki M, Kuzyakov K (2018) Nitrogen fertilization raises CO2 efflux from inorganic carbon: a global assessment. Glob Change Biol 24:2810–2817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Xia Y, Hu Y, Chen X, Rui Y, Gunina A, He X, Ge T, Wu J, Su Y, Kuzyakov Y (2021) Stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil: effects of agricultural land use and climate at a continental scale. Soil till Res 209:104903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Chen C, Xu C, Zhu Q, Huang D (2016) Effects of soil acidification and liming on the phytoavailability of cadmium in paddy soils of central subtropical China. Environ Pollut 219:99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Liu X, Hao T, Zeng M, Shen J, Zhang F (2020) Cropland acidification increases risk of yield losses and food insecurity in China. Environ Pollut 256:113145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 42130716, 42107366, 41977100, 42177295), the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education (GTYR202103) and the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Gao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Caixian Tang

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, C., Tu, Q., Zheng, S. et al. Soil acidification induced by intensive agricultural use depending on climate. J Soils Sediments 22, 2604–2607 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03265-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03265-1

Keywords

Navigation