Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Driving factors for eco-innovation orientation: meeting sustainable growth in Tunisian agribusiness

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The agricultural and agri-food sectors have substantial environmental impacts due to the great volumes of food, energy, water, and packaging waste that these businesses generate. Eco-innovations present an important opportunity to mitigate this effect. Even though eco-innovation seeks to reduce environmental damage in the food and agri-food sectors, researchers have paid slight attention to the role of eco-innovation in agribusiness; however, several insights suggest that it would be worthwhile to examine the motivation drivers toward the adoption of eco-innovations. The current study sheds light on the driving forces of eco-innovation and its impact on sustainable business growth. This paper tests a set of hypothesized relationships that focus on a sample of 306 Tunisian enterprises. We harness structural equation modelling to examine the relationship between the driving factors of eco-innovation and enterprises’ sustainable business growth by analysing the eco-innovation strategy's mediating effects. The findings reveal: (1) regulatory-side drivers constitute the most influential factor that motivates entrepreneurs to adopt an eco-innovation strategy, (2) there is a positive relationship between eco-innovation strategy and enterprises’ sustainable business growth, and (3) eco-innovation strategy plays a fully mediating role between the driving factors and enterprises’ sustainable business growth. The present study led us to consider that an entrepreneur with an emotional attachment to the environment is designed as a decisive driver for eco-innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfred, A. M., Fremeth, R., & Adam. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). ’Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astuti, W. T., Sudiro, A., & Hadiwidjojo, D. (2019). Is Product Innovation always Beneficial for Small and Medium Enterprises? In 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018). Atlantis Press.

  • Azzone, G., & Noci, G. (1998). Seeing ecology and “green” innovations as a source of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11, 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Driha, O. M., Bekun, F. V., & Osundina, O. A. (2019). ’Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS Experience’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 25218–25234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., Higgings, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an Illustration.

  • Ben Amara, D. (2019). Replication Data for: Questionnaire EOI_EI. In.: Harvard Dataverse.

  • Bentler, P. M., & Mooijaart, A. B. (1989). Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rationale based on precision. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, A.-K., & Söderholm, K. (2011). Green innovation systems in Swedish industry, 1960–1989. Business History Review, 85, 677–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitencourt, C. C., de Oliveira Santini, F., Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., & Ladeira, W. J. (2019). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118721.

  • Bitencourt, C.C., et al. (2020). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118721.

  • Bonini, S. M. J., Hintz, G., & Mendonca, L. T. (2008). Addressing consumer concerns about climate change. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Google Scholar.

  • Cai, W., & Li, G. (2018). The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Montresor, S. (2012). Environmental innovations, local networks and internationalization. Industry and Innovation, 19, 697–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, L. M., & García, J. A. M. (2007). ’Cognitive–affective Model of consumer satisfaction. An Exploratory Study within the Framework of a Sporting Event’, Journal of Business Research, 60, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del González, P. R., & Könnölä, T. (2009). What is eco-innovation? In, Eco-innovation (Springer).

  • Chang, C.-H. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleff, T., & Rennings, K. (1999). Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. European Environment, 9, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperation, Organisation for Economic, and Development. (2009). Eco-innovation in industry: enabling green growth (OECD).

  • Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques-3.

  • Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Martini, C., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector. Research Policy, 44, 577–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courvisanos, J. (2014). Can Developing Countries Attempt A Sustainable Economic And Ecological Development? Case Of Tunisia.

  • Del'Homme, B., Filippi, M., & Ugaglia, A. (2008). Determinants of pesticides reduction in grape growing farms. In.

  • Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2016). The importance of the diverse drivers and types of environmental innovation for firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). ’Green and competitive? An Empirical Test of the Mediating Role of Environmental Innovation Strategy’, Journal of World Business, 43, 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euronet. (2012). Profil Environnemental de Pays, Tunisie, Rapport final. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/tunisia/documents/projets/profil_environnemental_tunisie_oct2012_fr.pdf.

  • Favre, F., Negassi, S., & Pfister, E. (2002). The effect of spillovers and government subsidies on R&D, international R&D cooperation and profits: evidence from France. In, Innovation and Firm Performance (Springer).

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39–50.

  • González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: An empirical analysis. Omega, 33, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., McMeekin, A., & Irwin, A. (1994). Technological trajectories and R&D for environmental innovation in UK firms. Futures, 26, 1047–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunarathne, N. (2019). Sustainable Innovation Measurement: Approaches and Challenges. In, Innovation for Sustainability (Springer).

  • Guoyou, Qi., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: A case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. vectors, 7th Editio. In.: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (Sage publications).

  • Hillestad, T., Xie, C., & Haugland, S. A. (2010). Innovative corporate social responsibility: The founder’s role in creating a trustworthy corporate brand through “green innovation.” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 19, 440–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008). “ Low-technology”: A forgotten sector in innovation policy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., & Robertson, P. L. (2006). ‘Low-tech’Industries: Innovativeness and Development Perspectives—A Summary of a European Research Project. Prometheus, 24, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houssem Eddine, C., Pellissier, J. P., Rolland, J. P., & Khechimi, W. (2019). Rapport de synthèse sur l’agriculture en Tunisie. In.

  • Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). ’What drives eco-innovation? A Review of an Emerging Literature’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., & Manolova, T. S. (2018). Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1312–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J., Oltra, V., & Belin, J. (2013). Determinants and specificities of eco-innovations compared to other innovations—an econometric analysis for the French and German industry based on the community innovation survey. Industry and Innovation, 20, 523–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz, C. J., & Stanton, J. (2007). ’Who are organic food consumers? A Compilation and Review of Why People Purchase Organic Food’, Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 6, 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jové-Llopis, E., & Segarra-Blasco, A. (2018). Eco-innovation strategies: A panel data analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1209–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, E., & Demirel, P. (2012). On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK. Research Policy, 41, 862–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaa, P., & Mickwitz, P. (2006). The challenge of greening technologies—Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Research Policy, 35, 729–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., Schlägel, C., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation. Industry and Innovation, 1–38.

  • Kooria, M. F. (2019). Determinants and Outcomes of Consumer Green Attitude; Moderating Role of Price Consciousness and Degree of Greenness. PMAS-Arid Agriculture University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labelle, F., Courrent, J. M., & Spence, M. (2017). Préférences des PME en matière de politiques publiques de responsabilité sociale des entreprises: une comparaison France-Québec. Management international/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 21, 130–44.

  • Laforet, S. (2009). Effects of size, market and strategic orientation on innovation in non-high-tech manufacturing SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 43, 188–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2014). Environmental innovation practices and performance: Moderating effect of resource commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 450–458.

  • Lim, E. K. (2020). Consumer Perception of Purchasing Organic Foods: A Case Study of Online Consumer Behavior. In, Strategies and Tools for Managing Connected Consumers (IGI Global).

  • Lin, He., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2014). ’Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33, 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manual, F. (2002). Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. In: OECD Paris.

  • Marchi, De., & Valentina. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41, 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, S. (2009). Brave old world: Accounting for ‘high-tech’knowledge in ‘low-tech’industries. Research Policy, 38, 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musaad, O., Sultan, A., Zhang Zhuo, O., Musaad, A. O., Siyal, Z. A., Hashmi, H., & Shah, S. A. A. (2020). A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analysis of Barriers and Policy Strategies for Small and Medium Enterprises to Adopt Green Innovation. Symmetry, 12, 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, R., & Tidström, A. (2019). Circular Economy Inspired Imaginaries for Sustainable Innovations. In, Innovation for Sustainability (Springer).

  • Nazzaro, C., Stanco, M., & Marotta, G. (2020). The Life Cycle of Corporate Social Responsibility in Agri-Food: Value Creation Models. Sustainability, 12, 1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltra, V., & Jean, M. S. (2009). Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1991). America's green strategy. Scientific American, April. 96.

  • Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995a). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: environmental regulation and competitive advantage, 33.

  • Prystrom, J. (2017). Eco-innovation as the determinant of socioeconomic development on the example of the swediwh economy. Innovative (eco-) technology, entrepreneurship and regional development.

  • Rabadán, A., González-Moreno, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2019). Improving Firms’ Performance and Sustainability: The Case of Eco-Innovation in the Agri-Food Industry. Sustainability, 11, 5590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Río, D., Pablo, C. P., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2015). Distinctive features of environmental innovators: An econometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld, K.-M., Rennings, K., & Ziegler, A. (2007). Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 61, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roddis, P. (2018). Eco-innovation to reduce biodiversity impacts of wind energy: Key examples and drivers in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

  • Santos, D. F. L., Rezende, M. D. V., & Basso, L. F. C. (2019). Eco-innovation and business performance in emerging and developed economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117674.

  • Sáez-Martínez, F. J., Díaz-García, C., & Gonzalez-Moreno, A. (2016). Firm technological trajectory as a driver of eco-innovation in young small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, P., & Ángeles, and Xavier Vence Deza. (2015). Environmental policy instruments and eco-innovation: An overview of recent studies. Innovar, 25, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Töbelmann, D., & Wendler, T. (2020). The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118787.

  • Triguero, A., Fernández, S., & Sáez-Martinez, F. J. (2018). Inbound open innovative strategies and eco-innovation in the Spanish food and beverage industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2007). On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 36, 1587–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2008). Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 66, 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. K. (2016). Mediation analysis, categorical moderation analysis, and higher-order constructs modeling in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A B2B Example using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 26.

  • Yuan, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: The moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118543.

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J. J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega, 36, 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2012). Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: An ecological modernization perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29, 168–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Agricultural Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, People’s Republic of China

    Dhekra Ben Amara & Hong Chen

Authors
  1. Dhekra Ben Amara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Questionnaire items
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Amara, D., Chen, H. Driving factors for eco-innovation orientation: meeting sustainable growth in Tunisian agribusiness. Int Entrep Manag J 18, 713–732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00792-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00792-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation