Skip to main content
Log in

Autochthonous bioaugmentation with environmental samples rich in hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria for bench-scale bioremediation of oily seawater and desert soil

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oil-contaminated seawater and desert soil batches were bioaugmented with suspensions of pea (Pisum sativum) rhizosphere and soil with long history of oil pollution. Oil consumption was measured by gas-liquid chromatography. Hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria in the bioremediation batches were counted using a mineral medium with oil vapor as a sole carbon source and characterized by their 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA)-gene sequences. Most of the oil was consumed during the first 2–4 months, and the oil-removal rate decreased or ceased thereafter due to nutrient and oxygen depletion. Supplying the batches with NaNO3 (nitrogen fertilization) at a late phase of bioremediation resulted in reenhanced oil consumption and bacterial growth. In the seawater batches bioaugmented with rhizospheric suspension, the autochthonous rhizospheric bacterial species Microbacterium oxidans and Rhodococcus spp. were established and contributed to oil-removal. The rhizosphere-bioaugmented soil batches selectively favored Arthrobacter nitroguajacolicus, Caulobacter segnis, and Ensifer adherens. In seawater batches bioaugmented with long-contaminated soil, the predominant oil-removing bacterium was the marine species Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus. In soil batches on the other hand, the autochthonous inhabitants of the long-contaminated soil, Pseudomonas and Massilia species were established and contributed to oil removal. It was concluded that the use of rhizospheric bacteria for inoculating seawater and desert soil and of bacteria in long-contaminated soil for inoculating desert soil follows the concept of “autochthonous bioaugmentation.” Inoculating seawater with bacteria in long-contaminated soil, on the other hand, merits the designation “allochthonous bioaugmentation.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Awadhi H, Al-Mailem D, Dashti N, Khanafer M, Radwan S (2012) Indigenous hydrocarbon-utilizing bacterioflora in oil-polluted habitats in Kuwait, two decades after the greatest man-made oil-spill. Arch Microbiol 194:689–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali N, Dashti N, Al-Mailem D, Eliyas M, Radwan S (2012) Indigenous soil bacteria with the combined potential for hydrocarbon-consumption and heavy metal-resistance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:812–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zheng Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni V, Gianfreda L (2007) Bioremediation and monitoring of aromatic-polluted habitats. Appl Microbiol Biotech 76:287–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Applied Bioremediation Association (1989) Case history compendium. Applied Biotreatment Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Biotreatment Association (1990) The role of biotreatment of oil spill. Applied Biotreatment Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas RM, Bartha R (1998) Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications, 4th edn. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento FM, Camargo FAO, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2005) Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Bioresour Technol 96:1049–1055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiGregorio S, Castglione MR, Gentini A, Lorenzi R (2015) Biostimulation of the autochthonous bacterial community and bioaugmentation of selected bacterial strains for the depletion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a historically contaminated soil. Geophys Res Abstracts 17:14690

    Google Scholar 

  • Domde P, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2007) Impact of bioaugmentation with a consortium of bacteria on the remediation of wastewater-containing hydrocarbons. Enviro Sci Pollut Res 14:7–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fodelianakis S, Antoniou E, Mapelli F (2015) Allochthonous bioaugmentation in ex situ treatment of crude oil-polluted sediments in the presence of an effective degrading indigenous microbiome. J Hazard Materials 287:78–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu SH, Kralovec AC, Christensen ER, Van Camp RP (2003) Source apportionment of PAHs in dated sediments from the Black River. Water Resour 37:2149–2161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Head IM (1998) Bioremediation: a response to gross environmental abuse. Trends Biotechnol 11:599–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosakawa R, Nagai M, Morikawa M, Okayama H (2009) Autochthonous bioaugmentation and its possible application to oil spills. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1519–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawniczak K, Marecik R, Chrzanowski K (2013) Contributions of biosurfactants to natural our induced bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:2327–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg JJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: a beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Mal Plant Microb In 17:6–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marecik R, Chrzanowski K, Piotrowska-Cyplik A, Juzwa W, Bieganska-Marecik R (2015) Rhizosphere as a tool to introduce a soil isolated hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial consortium into a wetland environment. Inter Biodeter Biodegr 97:135–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon M, Vine P (1991) Tides of war. Immel, London

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1989) Using oil spill dispersants on the sea. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikopoulou M, Pasadakis N, Kalogerakis N (2013) Evaluation of autochthonous bioaugmentation and biostimulation during microcosm-simulated oil spills. Mar Pollut Bull 72:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odokuma LO, Dickson AA (2003) Bioremediation of a crude oil polluted tropical rain forest soil. Glob J Environ Sci 2:29–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piskonen R, Itävaara M (2004) Evaluation of chemical pretreatment of contaminated soil for improved PAH bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:627–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan SS (1990) Gulf oil spill. Nature 350:456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan SS (2008) Microbiology of oil-contaminated desert soils and coastal areas in the Arabian Gulf. In: Dion P, Nautiyal CS (eds) Soil biology—microbiology of extreme soils, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 275–297

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan SS (2009) Phytoremediation for oily desert soils. In: Singh A, Kuhad RC, Ward OP (eds) Advances in applied bioremediation. Springer, Berlin, pp 279–298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan SS, Sorkhoh NA, El-Nemr I, El-Desouky AF (1997) A feasibility study on seeding as a bioremediation practice for the oily Kuwaiti desert. J Appl Microbiol 83:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg E (1993) Exploiting microbial growth on hydrocarbons—new markets. Trends Biotechnol 11:419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santegoeds CM, Ferdelman TG, Muyzer G, Beer D (1998) Structural and functional dynamics of sulfate-reduction populations in bacterial biofilms. Appl Environ Micorbiol 64:3731–3739

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorkhoh NA, Ghannoum MA, Ibrahim AS, Stretton RJ, Radwan SS (1990) Crude oil and hydrocarbon degrading strains of Rhodococcus rhodochrous isolated from soil and marine environments in Kuwait. Environ Pollut 65:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup LE, Nielsen T, Krogh PH (2002) Soil ecotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in relation to soil sorption, lipophilicity, and water solubility. Environ Sci Technol 36:2429–2435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc A, Ambrozewicz D, Sydow M, Kawniczak K, Piotrowska-Cyplik A, Marecik R, Chrzanowski K (2014) The influence of bioaugmentation and biosurfactant addition on bioremediation efficiency of diesel-oil contaminated soil: feasibility during field studies. J Environ Manage 132:121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno A, Ito Y, Yumoto I, Okuyama H (2007) Isolation and characterization of bacteria from soil contaminated with diesel oil and the possible use of these in autochthonous bioaugmentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:1739–1745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Limbergen H, Top EM, Verstraete W (1998) Bioaugmentation in activated sludge: current features and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winogradsky S (1924) Sur la microflora autochtone de la terre arable. Comtes redus hebdomadaires des séances de l’ Academie des Sciences (Paris). D 178, 1236–1239

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Kuwait University, research grant RS 02/12. Thanks are due to the SAF unit and GRF, Kuwait University for providing facilities for GLC, (GS 02/01), ICP-MS (GS 01/05), and Genetic analysis (GS 01/02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir Radwan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Robert Duran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, N., Dashti, N., Salamah, S. et al. Autochthonous bioaugmentation with environmental samples rich in hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria for bench-scale bioremediation of oily seawater and desert soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 8686–8698 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6057-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6057-y

Keywords

Navigation