Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Review of Modelling Tools for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Handling Diffuse Water Pollution

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical catchment-scale model capable of simulating diffuse water pollution is necessary in sustainable environmental management for better implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. This paper provides critical reviews of most popular and free models for diffuse water modelling, with detailed sources and application potential. Based upon these reviews, further work of selecting and testing the HSPF model was carried out, with a case study in the Upper Bann Catchment, Northern Ireland. The calibrated and validated HSPF model can well represent the characteristics of surface water quantity and quality. Climate change scenario evaluation in 5 years showed that when the annual mean temperature increase 3°C the mean yearly total runoff volume will decrease by 11.1% and the mean daily river flow 11.4%. If 20% crop and pasture land is converted into forest land in the study area, the mean river concentration of nitrate, nitrite, NH4 and PO4 in 5 years will decrease by 19.4%, 33.3%, 31.3% and 31.3% respectively. When applying filter strip method in 80% crop and pasture land in the area, the reduction of the mean concentration of nitrate, nitrite, NH4 and PO4 in 5 years will be 15.3%, 33.3%, 31.3%, and 5.6% respectively. This study shows that HSPF is a suitable model in handling diffuse source water pollution, which can be introduced into the Programme of Measures in the River Basin Management Plans for better implementation of the EU WFD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Abed NA, Whiteley HR (2002) Calibration of the hydrological simulation program Fortran (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems. Hydrol Process 16:3169–3188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albek M, Öğütveren ÜB, Albek E (2004) Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF. J Hydrol 285:260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Williams JR, Nicks AD, Sammons NB (1989) SWRRB, a basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, p 255

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrological modelling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnwell TO, Johanson R (1981) HSPF: a comprehensive package for simulation of watershed hydrology and water quality. In: Flynn KC (ed) Nonpoint pollution control: tools and techniques for the future. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley DB, Huggins LF (1981) ANSWERS users manual. EPA-905/9-82-001. US EPA, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Benaman J, Shoemaker CA, Haith DA (2005) Calibration and validation of soil and water assessment tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York. J Hydrol Eng 10:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell BR, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL, Jobes TH, Donigian AS (2005) Hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN version 12.2 user’s manual. Environmental Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Birgand F (2004) Evaluation of QUAL2E. In: Parsons JE, Thomas DL, Huffman RL (eds) Agricultural non-point source water quality models: their use and application. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 398. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, pp 99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski I, Hare M (2007) Exploring the gap between water managers and researchers: difficulties of model-based tools to support practical water management. Water Resour Manag 21:1049–1074. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LC, Barnwell TO Jr (1987) The enhanced stream water quality model s QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: documentation and user manual. Tufts University and US EPA, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun SE, Band LE (2000) Simulating runoff behaviour in an urbanizing watershed. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell N, D’Arcy B, Forst A, Novotny V, Sansom A (2004) Diffuse pollution—an introduction to the problems and solutions. IWA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsel RF, Smith CN, Mulkey LA, Dean JD, Jowise P (1984) User’s manual for the pesticide root zone model (PRZM): release 1. EPA-600/3-84-109. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho J, Barone VA, Mostaghimi S (2009) Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed. Agric Water Manag 96:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi W, Deal BM (2008) Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling for the Kishwaukee River basin (USA). J Environ Manag 88:1119–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins AL, McGonigle DF (2008) Monitoring and modelling diffuse pollution from agriculture for policy support: UK and European experience. Environ Sci Policy 11:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford NH, Linsley RK (1966) Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford watershed model IV. Technical report 39. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JD, Huyakorn PS, Donigian AS, Voos KA, Schanz RW, Meeks YJ, Carsel RF (1989) Risk of unsaturated/saturated transport and transformation of chemical concentrations (RUSTIC). EPA/600/3-89/048a. US Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2002) The government’s strategic review of diffuse water pollution from agriculture in England: agriculture and water—a diffuse pollution review. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Kok J, Kofalk S, Berlekamp J, Hahn B, Wind H (2009) From design to application of a decision-support system for integrated river-basin management. Water Resour Manag 23:1781–1811. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9352-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diogo PA, Fonseca M, Coelho PS, Mateus NS, Almeida MC, Rodrigues AC (2008) Reservoir phosphorous sources evaluation and water quality modeling in a transboundary watershed. Desalination 226:200–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoE, DARD UK (2003) A consultation paper on nitrates and the protection of groundwaters in Northern Ireland. Department of Environment and Department of Agriculture and Rural Development UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Donigian AS Jr, Crawford NH (1976) Modeling nonpoint pollution from the land surface. EPA 600/3-76-083. Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, p 280

    Google Scholar 

  • Donigian AS Jr, Huber WC (1991) Modeling of nonpoint source water quality in urban and non-urban areas (EPA/600/3-91/039). US EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Donigian AS Jr, Imhoff JC (2002) From the Stanford model to BASINS: 40 years of watershed modeling. ASCE task committee on evolution of hydrologic methods through computers. ASCE 150th anniversary celebration, 3–7 November 2002, Washington, DC

  • Donigian AS Jr, Beyerlein DC, Davis HH Jr, Crawford NH (1977) Agricultural runoff management (ARM) model version II: refinement and testing. EPA 600/3-77-098. Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, p 294

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Communities) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. OJ L 327, 22 December 2000

  • EHS (2001) Policy and practice for the protection of groundwater in Northern Ireland. EHS, Belfast

    Google Scholar 

  • Even S, Billen G, Bacq N, Théry S, Ruelland D, Garnier J, Cugier P, Poulin M, Blanc S, Lamy F, Paffoni C (2007) New tools for modelling water quality of hydrosystems: an application in the Seine River basin in the frame of the Water Framework Directive. Sci Total Environ 375:274–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen J (1995) Contaminant transport component of the catchment modelling system SHETRAN. In: Trudgill ST (ed) Solute modelling in catchment systems. Wiley, Chichester, pp 417–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier B, D’Arcy B, MacDonald J, Aitken M (2004) Diffuse pollution—what is the nature of the problem? The water framework directive: integrating approaches to diffuse pollution. SOAS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis EJB, Vladich H, Voinov A (2007) Participatory modeling and the dilemma of diffuse nitrogen management in a residential watershed. Environ Model Softw 22:619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbiati L, Bouraoui F, Elorza FJ, Bidoglio G (2006) Modeling diffuse pollution loading into a Mediterranean lagoon: development and application of an integrated surface–subsurface model tool. Ecol Model 193:4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher M, Doherty J (2007) Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environ Model Softw 22:1000–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi C (2005) Decision support systems for implementing the European water framework directive: the MULINO approach. Environ Model Softw 22:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEC (Hydrologic Engineering Center) (1977) Storage, Treatment, Overflow, Runoff Model, STORM, user’s manual, generalized computer program 723-S8-L7520. Corps of Engineers, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz I, Pulido-Velazquez M, Lund JR, Andreu J (2007) Hydro-economic modeling in river basin management: implications and applications for the European water framework directive. Water Resour Manag 21:1103–1125. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9101-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessea C, Krysanova V, Pazolt J, Hattermann FF (2008) Eco-hydrological modelling in a highly regulated lowland catchment to find measures for improving water quality. Ecol Model 218:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im S, Brannan K, Mostaghimi S, Cho J (2003) A comparison of SWAT and HSPF models for simulating hydrologic and water quality responses from an urbanizing watershed. ASAE Paper no. 032175. ASAE Annual International Meeting

  • Jensen ME, Haise HR (1963) Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation: proceedings of the American society of civil engineers. J Irrig Drain Eng 89(IR4):15–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi L (1982) Testing the application of CREAMS to Finnish conditions. In: Svetlosanov V, Knisel WG (eds) European and United States case studies in application of the CREAMS model. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, pp 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen JPC (2005) An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res 164(2):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knisel WG (1980) ACREAMS, a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems. USDA Conservation Research Report No. 26, pp 643

  • Knisel WG, Foster GR, Leonard RA (1983) ACREAMS: a system for evaluating management practices. In: Schaller FW, Bailey GW (eds) Agricultural management and water quality. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 178–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisel WG, Leonard RA, Davis FM (1989) A agricultural management alternatives: GLEAMS model simulations. In: Proceedings of the computer simulation conference. Austin, Texas, pp 701–706

  • Koo BK, O’Connell PE (2006) An integrated modelling and multicriteria analysis approach to managing nitrate diffuse pollution: 1. Framework and methodology. Sci Total Environ 359:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause S, Heathwaite AL, Miller F, Hulme P, Crowe A (2007) Groundwater-dependent wetlands in the UK and Ireland: controls, functioning and assessing the likelihood of damage from human activities. Water Resour Manag 21:2015–2025. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9192-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause S, Jacobs J, Voss A, Bronstert A, Zehe E (2008) Assessing the impact of changes in land use and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain. Sci Total Environ 389:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahlou M, Shoemaker L, Choudhury S, Elmer R, Hu A, Manguerra H, Parker A (1998) Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources—BASINS version 1.0. EPA-823-B-98-006 (computer program manual). US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard RA, Knisel WG (1984) Model selection for nonpoint source pollution and resource conservation. In: Proc. of the international conference on agriculture and environment 1984. Venice, Italy, pp E1–E18

  • Leonard RA, Knisel WG, Still DA (1987) AGLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans ASAE 30(5):1403–1418

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo B, Li JB, Huang GH, Li HL (2006) A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control through land retirement. Sci Total Environ 361:38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., University of Florida, Water Resources Engineers, Inc. (1971) Storm water management model, volume IC. Final Report. EPA report 11024DOC07/71 (NTIS PB-203289). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert E (2003) The European water framework directive and water management research. Phys Chem Earth 28:523–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr A, Bruen M, Jordan P, Moles R, Kiely G, Byrne P (2007) A comparison of SWAT, HSPF and SHETRAN/GOPC for modelling phosphorus export from three catchments in Ireland. Water Res 41(5):1065–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng HYF, Marsalek J (1989) Simulation of the effects of urbanization on basin stream flow. Water Resour Bull 25:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi Y, Wise SE (1979) Mathematical model, SERATRA, for sediment-contaminant transport in rivers and its application to pesticide transport in four mile and wolf creeks in Iowa. Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr P, Colvin J, King D (2007) Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales. Water Resour Manag 21:331–349. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9056-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyarzun R, Arumí J, Salgado L, Mariño M (2007) Sensitivity analysis and field testing of the RISK-N model in the Central Valley of Chile. Agric Water Manag 87:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson MR, Sworski TJ, Sjoreen AL, Browman MG, Coutant CC, Hetrick DM, Murphy BD, Raridon RJ (1983) A user’s manual for UTM-TOX, a unified transport model. Draft. Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, for US EPA Office of Toxic Substances, Washington, DC

  • Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proc R Soc Lond A 193(1032):120–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JR, Hamlett JM (1998) Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(3):531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Salbe I (1995) Modelling impacts of diffuse and point source nutrients on the water quality of South Creek catchment. Environ Int 21(5):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribarova I, Ninovb P, Cooper D (2008) Modeling nutrient pollution during a first flood event using HSPF software: Iskar River case study, Bulgaria. Ecol Mod 211:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesner LA, Aldrich JA, Dickinson RE (1988) Storm water management model user’s manual version 4: Addendum I, EXTRAN. EPA/600/3-88/001b (NTIS PB88-236658/AS). US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross MA, Tara PD, Geurink JS, Stewart MT (1997) FIPR hydrologic model: users manual and technical documentation. Prepared for Florida Institute of Phosphate Research, Bartow, FL, and Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville by University of South Florida, Tampa

  • Shoemaker L, Dai T, Koenig J (2005) TMDL model evaluation and research needs. EPA/600/R-05/149, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Silgram M, Anthony SG, Fawcett L, Stromqvist J (2008) Evaluating catchment-scale models for diffuse pollution policy support: some results from the EUROHARP project. Environ Sci Policy 11:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohier C, Degré A, Dautrebande S (2009) From root zone modelling to regional forecasting of nitrate concentration in recharge flows—the case of the Walloon Region (Belgium). J Hydrol 369:350–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeter WH, Phelps EB (1925) A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River. Public Health Bull. 146. US Public Health Service, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrecilla NJ, Galve JP, Zaera LG, Retamar JF, Álvarez ANA (2005) Nutrient sources and dynamics in a Mediterranean fluvial regime (Ebro river, NE Spain) and their implications for water management. J Hydrol 304:166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzoraki O, Nikolaidis NP (2007) A generalized framework for modeling the hydrologic and biogeochemical response of a Mediterranean temporary river basin. J Hydrol 346:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK EA (2005) The relationship between the land use planning system and the water framework directive. UK Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Van-Ast JA, Blansch KL, Boons F, Slingerland S (2005) Product policy as an instrument for water quality management. Water Resour Manag 19:187–198. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-2703-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JL, Yang YS (2008) An approach to catchment-scale groundwater nitrate risk assessment from diffuse agricultural sources: a case study in the Upper Bann, Northern Ireland. Hydrol Process 22:4274–4286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Nicks AD, Arnold JG (1985) Simulator for water resources in rural basins. ASCE J Hydraulic Eng 111(6):970–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanshin AL (1991) The problem of hotbed effect. In: Proceedings of the Black Sea symposium ecological problems and economic prospects. The Black Sea Foundation, Istanbul, pp 299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1986) Agricultural nonpoint source pollution model: a watershed analysis tool. Agriculture Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Morris

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan D, Lin B, Falconer RA, Tao J (2007) Development of an integrated model for assessing the impact of diffuse and point source pollution on coastal waters. Environ Model Softw 22:871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun, 130026, China

    Y. S. Yang

  2. School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3YE, UK

    Y. S. Yang

  3. British Geologic Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK

    L. Wang

Authors
  1. Y. S. Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. S. Yang.

Additional information

Software availability Software name/source: all reviewed software are mentioned in the text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Y.S., Wang, L. A Review of Modelling Tools for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Handling Diffuse Water Pollution. Water Resour Manage 24, 1819–1843 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9526-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9526-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation