Abstract
Supported by EU funds, the European research community has been putting much effort into providing model-based tools to support water resource managers in implementing water management as well as the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. This paper presents the results of a two-year long elicitation phase which aimed to explain why the use of tools in water management is not as great as the corresponding investment in applied research in this area might suggest it should be. The paper identifies a gap between water managers and research community that is evidence of a mutual misunderstanding of the fundamental activities of both communities. We elaborate on these misunderstandings between these two communities by focussing on their attitudes towards seven assumptions that derived from an elicitation phase carried out between 2003 and 2004. These misunderstandings appear to revolve around the issues of the role and importance of model-based tools in water management; the transferability of models to new target sites; the role of participatory modelling in water management; how to solve lack of confidence in model-based tools; the development of computer user interfaces to improve tool usability; and the nature of model integration. Based on these insights, recommendations for improving research, development and ultimately the use of model-based tools in river basin management processes are proposed. The recommendations include improving researchers’ understanding of water management processes and the role their tools play within such a process; identifying for both communities the importance that such tools can play as part of social learning-oriented management processes; improving the role of software consultancies as carriers of research results; considering new methods of model transferability between target basins; and expanding the structure of funding for academic research and development projects to allow the greater provision of non-technical requirements such as post-development tool maintenance and transferability, required by water managers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borowski I, Heeb J (2005) Evaluation of tools/models for integrated & participatory river basin management focusing on the interaction with agricultural management. Report of 2nd Policy Workshop of Harmoni-CA/WP5. Harmoni-CA report HCA-WP5-2005-05/Final Version, Osnabrueck, University of Osnabrueck. http://www.harmoni-ca.info
Bousquet F, Le Page C (2004) Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review. Ecol Model 176(3–4):313–332
Brugnach M, Tagg A, Keil F, de Lange W (2006) Uncertainty matters. Computer models at the science–policy interface. Journal Water Resources Management Special Issue: Participatory Methods for Water Resources Management.
Checkland P (1995) Model validation in soft systems practice. Syst Res 12(1):47–54
D’Aquino P, Le Page C, Bousquet F, Bah A (2003) Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: the selfCormas experiment in senegal. JASSS 6(3). http//jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/5.html
Delbecq AL, Ven AHVd, Gustafson D (1975) Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott, Foresman & Co., Brighton
Doran J (1996) From computer simulation to artificial societies. Trans Soc Comput Simul 14:69–77
Dørge J, Windolf J (2003) Implementation of the Water Framework Directive – can we use models as a tool in integrated river basin management? International Journal of River Basin Management 2(1):165–171
Edmüller A, Wilhelm T (2002) Moderation. Haufe, Freiburg
EU (2002) Guidance on public participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. Active involvement, consultation, and public access to information. Prepared in the framework of the Common Implementation Strategy of the European Commission and the EU Member States. http://forum.europa.eu.int/public/irc/env/wfd/library
EU (2003) Guidance on the planning process. Best practices in river basin planning. Prepared in the framework of the Common Implementation Strategy of the European Commission and the EU Member States. http://forum.europa.eu.int/public/irc/env/wfd/library
European Commission (2004) Water cycle and soil-related aspects. Water technologies: results and opportunities. Research Directorate-General. Global Change & Ecosystems, Brussels. http://europa.eu.int
Gilbert N (1998) The simulation of social processes. Edited transcript of talk given at SMAGET Conference, 6–8th October 1998, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Gilbert A, Goosen H, Tol RSJ (1998) Water and environment. Scoping study for the European forum for integrated environmental assessment. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1998) Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer Forschung. Verlag Hans Huber
Grabowski M, Massey AP, Wallace WA (1992) Focus groups as a group knowledge acquisition technique. Knowl Acquis 4:407–425
Greeuw SCH, Asselt MBAv, et al (2000). Cloudy cristal balls – an assessment of recent European and global scenario studies and models (experts’ corner report prospects and scenarios no 4). Environmental Issues Series. E. E. Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark
Hare M (2003) Plan for integration of the First Policy and Method Worskhops for Workpackage 5 of Harmoni-CA. Harmoni-CA Document HCA-WP5-2003-Re01. University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck
Hare M (2004a) Modeller’s recommended research directions for models to support the participatory elements of the Water Framework Directive. Report on the 1st Modellers’ & Scientists’ Workshop of the Harmoni-CA WP5 Project, Harmoni-CA report HCA-WP5-2004-Re02/Final Version. University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck (available at http://www.harmoni-ca.info)
Hare M (2004b) Policy makers’ requirements for models to support the participatory elements of the WFD. Report on the 1st Policy Workshop of Harmoni-CA/WP5. Harmoni-CA report HCA-WP5-2004-01/Final Version. University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck (available at http://www.harmoni-ca.info )
Hare M (2005) The use of models to support the participatory elements of the EU Water Framework Directive: creating a dialogue between policy makers and model makers. Harmoni-CA report HCA-WP5-2004-04/Final Version. University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck (available at http://www.harmoni-ca.info)
Hare MP, Deadman P (2004) Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management. Math Comput Simul 64:25–40
Hare MP, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) Participatory modelling in natural resource management: a comparison of four case studies. Integrated Assessment 2(4):62–72
Hare MP, Barreteau O, Beck MB, Cogan V, Mostert E, Letcher R, Ridder D, Tabara JD (2006) Methods for stakeholder participation in water management. In: Giupponi C, Jakeman AJ, Karssenberg D, Hare MP (eds) Sustainable management of water resources: an integrated approach. Edward Elgar, Chichester
HarmoniCOP (2005) Learning together to manage together – improving participation in water management. Handbook of the HarmoniCOP project. http://www.harmonicop.info
Horlitz T (2006) The role of model interfaces for participation in water management. Journal Water Resources Management Special Issue: Participatory Methods for Water Resources Management
Judson OP (1994) The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. TREE 9(1):9–14
LAWA (2003) Arbeitshilfe zur Umsetzung der EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Teil 3 & 4. Bearbeitungsstand 30. 04. 2003. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser. http://wasserblick.net/
Larsen H, Mark O et al (2000) The application of models in integrated river basin management. Internal Publication des Asian Institute of Technology and DHI Water & Environment. DHI.
Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ, Croke BFW (2004) Model development for integrated assessment of water allocation options. Water Resour Res 40:W05502
Lynam T, Bousquet F, Page CL, d’Aquino P, Barreteau O, Chinembin F, Mombeshora B (2002) Adapting science to adaptive managers: spidergrams, belief models and multi-agent systems modeling. Conservation Ecology 5:[online] URL: http:www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art24
Maiden NAM, Hare MP (1998) Problem domain categories in requirements engineering. Int J Human-Comput Stud 49:281–304
McGraw KL, Harbison K (1997) User-centred requirements – the scenario-based engineering process. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
McIntosh BS, Seaton RAF, Jeffrey P (2004) Tools to think with? Towards understanding the use and impact of model-based support tools. Environ Model Softw
Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5:179–197
Old G, Packman J (eds) (2005) Position paper on professional response. HarmoniQuA report. HarmoniQuA, Wageningen
Old G, Robinson M, Packman J (2005) Position paper on stakeholder response. WP4-4 Harmonising Quality Assurance in model based catchment and river basin management. HarmoniQuA, Wageningen
Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263:641–646
Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Participative and stakeholder-based policy design and modeling processes. Integrated Assessment 3(1):3–14
Pahl-Wostl C, Hare MP (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14:193–206
Quevauviller P (2006) Introduction to WISE– Water Information System for Europe. Presentation at the 3rd Harmoni-CA Forum & Conference, 5–7th April 2006. http://www.harmoni-ca.info
Refsgaard JC, van der Sluijs JP, Højberg AL, Vanrolleghem P (2005) Harmoni-CA guidance uncertainty analysis. Guidance no 1. Harmoni-CA, Brussels
Rekolainen S, Kämäri J, Hiltunen M (2004) A conceptual framework for identifying the need and role of models in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. International Journal of River Basin Management 1(4):1–6
Robinson JB, Freebairn DM (2001) The decision-maker has an important but often neglected, role in model use. MODSIM 2001 4:1595–1600
Scholten H, Kassahun A, Refsgaard JC, Kargas T, Gavardinas C, Beulens AJM (in press) A methodology to support multidisciplinary model-based water management. Environ Model and Softw
Swinford A, McIntosh B, Jeffrey P (2004) Supporting the strategic objectives of participative water resources management: an evaluation of the performance of four ICT tools. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Schmidt S, Rizzoli AE, Jakeman AJ (eds) Complexity and integrated resources management. Transactions of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society. iEMSs: Manno, Switzerland. ISBN 88-900787-1-5
Ubbels A, Verhallen AJM (2000) Suitability of decision support tools for collaborative planning processes in water resources management. RIZA rapport 99.067. RIZA, Wageningen
Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building. Wiley, Chichester
Vennix JAM (1999) Group model-building: tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review 15(4):379–401
Vonk G, Geertman S, Schot P (2005) Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environ Plann A 17:909–924
Wasson J-G, Tusseau-Vuillemin MH, Andreassian V, Perrin C, Faure JB, Barreteau O, Bousquet M, Chastan B (2003) What kind of water models are needed for the implementation of the European water framework directive? Examples from France. International Journal of River Basin Management 2(1):125–135
Welp M (2001) The use of decision support tools in participatory river basin management. Phys Chem Earth 26(7–8):535–539
Winograd T (1990) Thinking machines: can there be? Are we? In: Partridge D, Wilks Y (eds) The foundations of artificial intelligence: a sourcebook. Cambridge, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borowski, I., Hare, M. Exploring the Gap Between Water Managers and Researchers: Difficulties of Model-Based Tools to Support Practical Water Management. Water Resour Manage 21, 1049–1074 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z