Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Restrictions in the sprouting ability of an invasive coastal plant, Ammophila arenaria, from fragmented rhizomes

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dispersal of rhizomes by waves and ocean currents allows invasive coastal plants to spread rapidly over long distances. Long-term management of these species should recognise the potential for regeneration from rhizome fragments and the likelihood of invasion or reinvasion of dunes. Here, we assess the sprouting ability of Ammophila arenaria (marram grass), an invasive weed of temperate dune systems, which spreads by the marine dispersal of rhizomes. Rhizomes were obtained from four sites in southern New Zealand. Comparative growth trials were conducted to compare the sprouting ability of rhizomes originating from different populations, seasonal restrictions in sprouting potential, and the effects of fragment morphology (length and node number) and rhizome type (vertical or horizontal) on sprouting ability. Overall, the sprouting ability of A. arenaria is high, although we found this ability varied between populations, with season, and in relation to fragment length. Rhizomes formed shoots rapidly when fragmented, indicating a weak or limited innate dormancy. Reduced sprouting appears to be due to variation in the growth reserves stored within the rhizomes at the time of fragmentation. Large numbers of viable rhizomes will be dispersed during events that erode foredunes, and all populations of invasive A. arenaria growing within reach of waves should be considered a potential source of propagules, a conclusion that has implications for management agencies seeking to protect or restore apparently isolated dune systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aptekar R, Rejmánek M (2000) The effect of sea-water submergence on rhizome bud viability of the introduced Ammophila arenaria and the native Leymus mollis in California. J Coast Conserv 6:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayeni AO, Duke WB (1985) The influence of rhizome features on subsequent regenerative capacity in speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv.). Agric Ecosyst Environ 13:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsæter LO, Fogelfors H, Fykse H, Graglia E, Jensen RK, Melander B, Salonen J, Vanhala P (2010) Seasonal restrictions of bud growth on roots of Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis and rhizomes of Elymus repens. Weed Res 50:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buell AC, Pickart AJ, Stuart JD (1995) Introduction history and invasion patterns of Ammophila arenaria on the north coast of California. Conserv Biol 9:1587–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Schulze ED, Mooney HA (1990) The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:423–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordazzo CV, Davy AJ (1999) Vegetative regeneration of Panicum racemosum from rhizome fragments on southern Brazilian coastal dunes. J Coastal Res 15:520–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordazzo CV, Seeliger U (2003) Reproduction and vegetative regeneration in Blutaparon portulacoides (Amaranthaceae) on backshores of southern Brazil. J Coastal Res 35:481–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy AJ, Figueroa E (1993) The colonization of strandlines. In: Miles J, Walton DWH (eds) Primary succession on land. Blackwell, London, pp 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Disraeli DJ (1984) The effect of sand deposits on the growth and morphology of Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doing H (1985) Coastal fore-dune zonation and succession in various parts of the world. Vegetatio 61:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke SO (1985) Weed physiology (volume I); reproduction and ecophysiology. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldred RA, Maun MA (1982) A multivariate approach to the problem of decline in vigour of Ammophila. Can J Bot 60:1371–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fant JB, Holmstrom RM, Sirkin E, Etterson JR, Masi S (2008) Genetic structure of threatened native populations and propagules used for restoration in a clonal species, American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata Fern.). Restor Ecol 16:594–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M (1985) Seed ecology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray AJ (1985) Adaptation in perennial coastal plants—with particular reference to heritable variation in Puccinellia maritima and Ammophila arenaria. In: Beeftink WJ, Rozema J, Huiskes AHL (eds) Ecology of coastal vegetation. Springer, Netherlands, pp 179–188

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P, Gemmell AR, Gimingham CH (1947) Tussock formation in Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link. New Phytol 46:262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker SD, Zarnetske P, Seabloom E, Ruggiero P, Mull J, Gerrity S, Jones C (2012) Subtle differences in two non-native congeneric beach grasses significantly affect their colonization, spread, and impact. Oikos 121:138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson S (2003) Weeds and weed management on arable land: an ecological approach. CABI, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris D, Davy AJ (1986) The regenerative potential of Elymus farctus from rhizome fragments and seeds. J Ecol 74:1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes M, Kirkpatrick JB (2012) Influence of Ammophila arenaria on half a century of vegetation change in eastern Tasmanian sand dune systems. Aust J Bot 60:450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertling UM, Lubke RA (1999) Indigenous and Ammophila arenaria-dominated dune vegetation on the South African Cape coast. Appl Veg Sci 2:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesp PA (1991) Ecological processes and plant adaptations on coastal dunes. J Arid Environ 21:165–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesp PA (2002) Foredunes and blowouts: initiation, geomorphology and dynamics. Geomorphology 48:245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesp PA, Hilton MJ (2013) Restoration of foredunes and transgressive dunefields: case studies from New Zealand. In: Martínez ML, Gallego-Fernández JB, Hesp PA (eds) Restoration of coastal dunes. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–92

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton MJ (2006) The loss of New Zealand’s active dunes and the spread of marram grass (Ammophila arenaria). New Zeal Geogr 62:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton MJ, Konlechner TM (2010) A review of the marram grass eradication program (1999–2009), Stewart Island, New Zealand. Proceedings, the New Zealand plant protection society inc. and the council of Australasian Weed Societies Inc.—17th Australasian weeds conference, 26–30 September 2010, Christchurch, pp 386–389

  • Hilton MJ, Konlechner TM (2011) Incipient foredunes developed from marine-dispersed rhizome of Ammophila arenaria. J Coast Res 64:288–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton MJ, Duncan M, Jul A (2005) Processes of Ammophila arenaria (marram grass) invasion and indigenous species displacement, Stewart Island, New Zealand. J Coast Res 21:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton MJ, Harvey N, Hart A, James K, Arbuckle C (2006) The impact of exotic dune grass species on foredune development in Australia and New Zealand: a case study of Ammophila arenaria and Thinopyrum junceiforme. Aust Geogr 37:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hol WH, van der Wurff AW, Skøt L, Cook R (2008) Two distinct AFLP types in three populations of marram grass (Ammophila arenaria) in Wales. Plant Genet Resour C 6:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope-Simpson JF, Jefferies RL (1966) Observations relating to vigour and debility in marram grass (Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link). J Ecol 54:271–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes AHL (1979) Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link (Psamma arenaria (L.) Roem. et Schult.; Calamgrostis arenaria (L.) Roth). J Ecol 67:363–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinlan BP, Gaines SD (2003) Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecol 84:2007–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš L, Klimešová J, Čížková H (1999) Carbohydrate storage in rhizomes of Phragmites australis: the effects of altitude and rhizome age. Aquat Bot 64:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knevel IC (2001) The life history of selected coastal foredune species of South Africa. Dissertation, Rhodes University

  • Konlechner TM (2008) Marine dispersal of terrestrial weeds. New Zeal Geogr 64:154–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konlechner TM (2012) The dispersal and establishment of Ammophila arenaria from rhizomes. Dissertation, University of Otago

  • Konlechner TM, Hilton MJ (2009) The potential for marine dispersal of Ammophila arenaria (marram grass) rhizome. J Coastal Res 56:434–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Konlechner TM, Hilton MJ (2010) An examination of the seed bank of Ammophila arenaria (marram grass). Proceedings, the New Zealand plant protection society inc. and the council of Australasian weed Societies Inc.—17th Australasian weeds conference, 26–30 September 2010, Christchurch, pp 390–393

  • Konlechner TM, Hilton MJ, Orlovich DA (2013) Accommodation space limits plant invasion: Ammophila arenaria survival on New Zealand beaches. J Coast Conserv 17:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koske RE, Gemma JN, Corkidi L, Sigüenza C, Rincón E (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizas in coastal dunes. In: Martinez ML, Psuty NP (eds) Coastal dunes, ecology and conservation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew J, Andersson L, Boström U, Forkman J, Hakman I, Magnuski E (2013) Regeneration capacity from buds on roots and rhizomes in five herbaceous perennials as affected by time of fragmentation. Plant Ecol 214:1199–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke RA, Hertling UM, Avis AM (1995) Is Ammophila arenaria (marram grass) a threat to South African dune fields? J Coast Conserv 1:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JK (1965) Corynephorus canescens (L.) P. Beauv. as a model for the Ammophila problem. J Ecol 53:447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1984) Colonizing ability of Ammophila breviligulata through vegetative regeneration. J Ecol 72:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1998) Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Can J Bot 76:713–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (2009) The biology of coastal sand dunes. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA, Baye PR (1989) The ecology of Ammophila breviligulata Fern. on coastal dune systems. CRC Cr Rev Aquat Sci 1:661–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Schurr FM, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A (2008) Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 23:638–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen SJ (1997) Ecological weeds on conservation land in New Zealand: a database. Department of Conservation, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik BM (1983) Nutrient and productivity relations of the dune grasses Ammophila arenaria and Elymus mollis. III. Spatial aspects of clonal expansion with reference to rhizome growth and the dispersal of buds. B Torrey Bot Club 110:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Echeverría S, Freitas H (2006) Diversity of AMF associated with Ammophila arenaria ssp. arundinacea in Portuguese sand dunes. Mycorrhiza 16:543–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaymaker DH, Peek MS, Wresilo J, Zeltner DC, Saleh YF (2014) Genetic structure of native and restored populations of American beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata Fern.) along the New Jersey coast. J Coast Res 31:1334–1343

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki JI, Stuefer J (1999) On the ecological and evolutionary significance of storage in clonal plants. Plant Spec Biol 14:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergiev S, Filipova-Marinova M, Trifonova E, Kotsev I, Pavlov D (2013) The impact of sea water immersion on the viability of psammophilous species Leymus racemoses subsp. sabulosus and Ammophila arenaria. CR Acad Bulg Sci 66:212–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber E (2011) Strong regeneration ability from rhizome fragments in two invasive clonal plants (Solidago canadensis and S. gigantea). Biol Invasions 13:2947–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West CJ, Thompson AM (2013) Small, dynamic and recently settled: responding to the impacts of plant invasions in the New Zealand (Aotearoa) archipelago. In: Foxcroft LC, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Genovesi P (eds) Plant invasions in protected areas. Patterns, problems and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 285–311

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann AM, Pickart AJ (2004) Temperate zone coastal dunes. In: Martinez ML, Psuty NP (eds) Coastal dunes, ecology and conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Woitke P, Kiehl A, Kühl H, Kohl JG (1997) Nitrogen and carbohydrate pools of two rhizome types of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Int Revueges Hydrobiol Hydrogr 82:161–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand

    Teresa M. Konlechner & Michael J. Hilton

  2. Department of Botany, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand

    David A. Orlovich

Authors
  1. Teresa M. Konlechner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David A. Orlovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Hilton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa M. Konlechner.

Additional information

Communicated by Raymond Froend.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konlechner, T.M., Orlovich, D.A. & Hilton, M.J. Restrictions in the sprouting ability of an invasive coastal plant, Ammophila arenaria, from fragmented rhizomes. Plant Ecol 217, 521–532 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0597-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0597-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation