Skip to main content
Log in

Helmholtz’s Vortex Motion: An Embodied View of Mathematics in the Heuristics of Fluid Mechanics

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some viewpoints on the foundations of mathematics and its philosophy are more connected to scientific practice and its heuristics, mainly with the construction of physical theories and the search for the best explanations of physical phenomena by means of abduction or the solution of problems by the analytical method. Some researchers have introduced the importance of human cultural activities into the cognitive aspects of the mental processes of scientists, proposing an embodied approach in the bridge between mathematics and reality. Fluid mechanics is an interesting area in this sense due to its position if the network of mathematics. By means of an historical example on vortex motion by Helmholtz, we show that the intuitive idea of eddy (or vortex) contains cognitive properties of a mental schema and that it gives many heuristic options (via cooperation with other heuristic instruments like extreme thinking, thought experiment and analogy) for an embodied mathematical explanation about vortex dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Diagram 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrow I (1660) Letiones geometricae (J. M. Child Trans., 1916): the geometrical lectures of Isaac Barrow. The Open Court Publishing Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci C (2008) The nature of mathematical explanation. Stud History Philos Sci A 39(2):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci C (2013) Top-down and bottom-up philosophy of mathematics. Found Sci 18:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci C, Gillies D (2005) Mathematical reasoning and heuristics. King’s College Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement J (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: the role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darrigol O (2005) Worlds of flow: a history of hydrodynamics from the Bernoullis to Prandtl. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis PJ, Hersh R (1981) The mathematical experience. Birkhäusser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D (2015) Why do scientific revolutions begin? In: Ippoliti E (ed) Heuristic reasoning. Springer, New York, pp 89–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson NR (1958). The logic of discovery. J Philos 55:1073–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz HV (1867) LXIII. On Integrals of the hydrodynamical equations, which express vortex-motion. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 33(226):485–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka J (1985) True and false logic of scientific discovery. Commun Cognition 18(1/2):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsten L (2016) Philosophy of mathematics. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Stanford University, Stanford. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/philosophy-mathematics/&gt

  • Ippoliti E (2013) Generation of hypotheses by ampliation of data. In: Magnani L (ed) Model-based reasoning in science and technology: theoretical and cognitive issues. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti E (2014) Dynamic generation of hypotheses: mandelbrot, soros and far-from-equilibrium. In: Ippoliti E (ed) Heuristic reasoning. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti E (2016) Mathematical models of time as a heuristic tool. In: Magnani L, Casadio C (eds) Model-based reasoning in science and technology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard J, Jacoby J (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills: a practical guide for social scientists. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Nuñez RE (2000) Where mathematics come from. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroux J (2001) ‘Picture theories’ as forerunners of the semantic approach to scientific theories. Int Stud Philos Sci 15(2):189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Lane S (1986) Mathematics: form and function. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2001) Abduction, reason, and science: processes of discovery and explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2007) Abduction and chance discovery in science. Int J Knowl Based Intell Eng 11:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2014) Are heuristics knowledge-enhancing? Abduction, models, and fictions in science. In: Ippoliti E (ed) Heuristic reasoning. Springer, New York, pp 29–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola S (2004) Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: the importance of strategies. Found Sci 9(3):267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos S (1996) Ampliative reasoning: induction or abduction. ECAI96 workshop on abductive and inductive reasoning. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse H, Ince S (1957). History of hydraulics. Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintonen M (1996) Structuralism and the interrogative model of inquiry. In: Balzer W, Moulines CU (eds) Structuralist theory of science: focal issues, new results. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp 45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulazia A (2016a) The cognitive nexus between Bohr’s analogy for the atom and Pauli’s exclusion schema. Endeavour 40(1):56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulazia A (2016b) Multiple roles for analogies in the genesis of fluid mechanics: how analogies can cooperate with other Heuristic strategies. Found Sci 21(4):543–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Iowa Gallery (2017). Retrieved http://user.engineering.uiowa.edu/~cfd/gallery/vortex.html

  • Venturi GB (1797) Recherches experimentales sur le principe de communication laterale dans les jluides, Paris.

  • Venturi GB (1826) Experimental inquiries concerning the principle of the lateral communication of motion in fluids. In: Tredgold T (ed) Tracts on hydraulics, London. J. Taylor (translation by W. Nicholson, 2nd edn)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Ulazia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ulazia, A., Ezenarro, E. Helmholtz’s Vortex Motion: An Embodied View of Mathematics in the Heuristics of Fluid Mechanics. Topoi 39, 949–961 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9538-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9538-9

Keywords

Navigation