Abstract
This study used the Draw-A-Scientist Test Checklist (DAST-C) to analyze and assess how scientists are portrayed in the illustrations found within two different prominent science textbook series used in Texas. Researchers reviewed 18 Kindergarten through eighth grade science textbooks in which 415 pages (N=8543 total), included images depicting scientists. The historical view of a scientist is of an elderly, Caucasian male working in a laboratory, who wears glasses, has white hair, is absent-minded and disorganized, wears a lab coat and works with laboratory instruments such as test tubes. However, this study noted that both scientist age and place of work changed. These positive results showed that the pictures of scientists are getting younger and that scientists work in a variety of places both indoors and outdoors. However, this study showed that most scientist pictures are primarily portrayed as Caucasian males. This indicates that the publishers of science textbooks are still using many stereotypical pictures of scientists, even though science standards are trying to encourage underrepresented ethnic minorities and females into science careers. This non-inclusive stance promotes non-equitable representation of scientists and negatively impacts minorities and females’ science self-efficacy and science identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of Publishers Association of American Publishers. (2021), AAAP March 2021 statshot report. https://publishers.org/news/aap-march-2021-statshot-report-publishing-industry-up-40-2-for-third-month-of-2021-and-22-3-year-to-date/
Apple, M. (1971). The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict. Interchange, 2(4), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287080
Archer, L., Dewitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). Construction of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
Avraamidou, L. (2013). Superheroes and supervillains: Reconstructing the mad-scientist stereotype in school science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.761605
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co..
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
Bazler, J. A., & Simonis, D. A. (1991). Are high school chemistry textbooks gender fair? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280408
Blotnicky, K., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3
Buldu, M. (2006). Young children’s perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500498602
Burke, R. J. (2007). Women and minorities in STEM: A primer. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 3–27). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260
Ceglie, R., & Olivares, V. (2012). Representation of diversity in science textbooks. In H. Hickman & B. J. Porfilio (Eds.), The new politics of the textbook. Constructing Knowledge, vol 1. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-912-1_4
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
Chiu, A., Price, C.A. & Ovrahim, E. (2015). Supporting elementary and middle school STEM education at the whole-school level. [Paper presentation]. National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2015 Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, United States. https://www.msichicago.org/fileadmin/assets/educators/science_leadership_initiative/SLI_Lit_Review.pdf
Cutting, J. E., & Massironi, M. (1998). Pictures and their special status in perceptual and cognitive inquiry. In J. Hochberg, E. Carterette, & M. Friedman (Eds.), Perception and cognition at the century’s end: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 137–168). Academic Press.
Department of Education. (2022). Department launches “YOU Belong in Stem” initiative to enhance STEM education for all young people. US Department of Education https://www.ed.gov/stem
Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Development and field test of the modified Draw-a-Scientist Test and the Draw-a-Scientist Rubric. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00124.x
Farland-Smith, D., Finson, K. D., & Arquette, C. M. (2017). How picture books on the national science teacher’s association recommend list portray scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 117(6), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12231
Fayer, S., Lacey, A. & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future.pdf
Finson, K., Beaver, J., & Cramond, B. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-A-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x
Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
Finson, K. D. (2003). Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174741
Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree. Educational Developments, 7(4), 4–7.
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x
Ford, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26(8), 8–13 https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.uoregon.edu/stable/43167098
Gangi, J. M. (2008). The unbearable whiteness of literacy instruction: Realizing the implications of the proficient reader research. Multicultural Review, 17(1), 30–35.
Graham, M. C., Ivey, A., DeRosia, N., & Skorodinsky, M. (2020). Education for whom? Equity & Excellence in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1791765
Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.010
Gurule, K. (1973). Truthful textbooks and Mexican Americans. Equity & Excellence in Education, 11(2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020486730110206
Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.002
Hickman, H., & Porfilio, B. J. (Eds.). (2012). The new politics of the textbook: Problematizing the portrayal of marginalized groups in textbooks. Sense Publishers.
Hogben, M., & Waterman, C. K. (1997). Are all of your students represented in their textbooks? A content analysis of coverage of diversity issues in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 24(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2402_3
Jones, L. K., & Hite, R. (2021). A global comparison of the circumscription and compromise theory of career development in science career aspirations. School Science and Mathematics, 121(7), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12492
Kaur, G. (2015). Curricular images of scientists: Textbooks and popularity of science. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(36), 71–76.
Kelly, L. B. (2018). An analysis of award-winning science trade books for children: Who are the scientists, and what is science? Journal of Research Science Teaching, 55, 1188–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21447
Lederman, M. (2003). Gender/Inequity in science education: A response. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 604–606.
McCann, F. F., & Marek, E. A. (2016). Achieving diversity in STEM: The role of drawing-based instruments. Creative Education, 7, 2293–2304. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.715223
McKinley, C. J., Mastro, D., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Social identity theory as a framework for understanding the effects of exposure to positive media images of self and other on intergroup outcomes. International Journal of Communication., 8, 1049–1068.
Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 126, 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.126.3270.384
Medina, J. (2014). Vision: Vision trumps all other senses. Retrieved from http://brainrules.net/vision/
National Science Teacher Association (2000) Position statement: Multicultural science education. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/multicultural-science-education.
Oakes, J. (1990). Chapter 3: Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16(1), 153–222. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X016001153
Rawson, C., & McCool, M. (2014). Just like all the other humans? Analyzing images of scientists in children’s trade books. School Science and Mathematics, 114(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12046
Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (1991). Textbooks and race, class, gender and disability. In M. W. Apple & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 78–110). Routledge.
Stampp, K. M., Jordan, W. D., Levine, L. W., Middlekauff, R. L., Sellers, C. G., & Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1964). The Negro in American history textbooks. Equity & Excellence in Education, 2(5), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020486640020502
Thomson, M. M., Zakaria, Z., & Radut-Taciu, R. (2019). Perceptions of scientists and stereotypes through the eyes of young school children. Education Research International, 13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6324704
United States. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The National Commission on Excellence in Education.
Vojir, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516.
Williams, M., & George, C. (2014). Using and doing science: Gender, self-efficacy, and science identity of undergraduate students in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 99–126.
Yacoubian, H., Al-Khatib, L., & Mardirossian, T. (2017). Analysis of the image of scientists portrayed in Lebanese national science textbooks. Science & Education, 26(5), 513–528.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sinclair, B.B., Long, C.S., Szabo, S. et al. Investigating Equitable Representation in K-8 Science Textbook Portrayal of Scientists. Sci & Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00482-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00482-z