Skip to main content
Log in

The (Dis)Unity of Cultural Evolutionary Theory

Tim Lewens (2015) Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN: 978-0-19-967418-3, 205 Pages, Price: $45.00 (Hardcover)

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Content biases are sometimes considered as a cultural analog of meiotic drive. I suspect that Lewens has this in mind when he argues that the kinetic interpretation better preserves the “taxonomic precision” of Richerson and Boyd’s and Sperber’s formulations of cultural evolutionary theory. I cannot dwell on this point but, as Mesoudi (Cultural Evolution, 2011, p. 65) has—in my opinion correctly—pointed out, variational processes like meiotic drive imply the transformation of a variant and, therefore, they should be distinguished from cases, like the one at stake here, where what changes is the frequency of the variant, and not its features.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Baravalle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baravalle, L. The (Dis)Unity of Cultural Evolutionary Theory. Sci & Educ 27, 225–231 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9951-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9951-x

Navigation