Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Optimal Global Integration–Local Responsiveness Tradeoff for an International Branch Campus

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth in the number of international branch campuses (IBCs) has been one of the most striking developments in the internationalization of higher education in recent years. IBCs are overwhelmingly branches of universities in the developed ‘West’. The United States, the United Kingdom and Australia dominate provision. In contrast, IBCs are concentrated in the Middle-East and Asia. The cultural distance between the home and host countries of many IBCs is considerable. This distance poses a major challenge for the successful management of an IBC. Should it localize its curriculum and pedagogy to better meet the learning styles and educational needs of its students or should it provide an educational experience that is comparable to that enjoyed by students on the home campus? This paper takes as its theoretical framework the global integration–local responsiveness (I–R) paradigm. Using an exploratory research design, it finds that the I–R paradigm can be operationalized for IBCs, to predict how faculty, the curriculum and research are likely to be localized in response to pressure from an IBC’s main internal and external stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Adapted from Shams and Huisman (2012)

Fig. 2

Adapted from Shams and Huisman (2012)

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarrevaara, T. (2010). Academic freedom in a changing academic world. European Review, 18(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (2007). The imperial tongue: English as the dominating academic language. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(36), 3608–3611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. (1971). Power and conflict in the university: Research in the sociology of complex organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Beamish, P. (2011). Transnational management: Text, cases and readings in cross-border management. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. (2009). International branch campuses: Markets and strategies. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. Retrieved June 6, 2012 from http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/view_details?id=770.

  • Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., & Hulland, J. (1995). Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16(8), 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmur, D. (2007). A critical analysis of the UNESCO/OECD guidelines for quality provision of cross-border higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 13(2), 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodycott, P., & Walker, A. (2000). Teaching abroad: Lessons learned about intercultural understanding for teachers in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (2012). University of Waterloo closes Dubai campus. The Globe and Mail, 9 November. Retrieved February 20, 2014 from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/education/university-of-waterloo-closes-dubai-campus/article5173582/.

  • Carnegie, G., & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of university governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castle, R., & Kelly, D. (2004). International education: Quality assurance and standards in offshore teaching: Exemplars and problems. Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D., Austin, A., Farah, S., Wilson, E., & Ridge, N. (2014). Academic staff in the UAE: Unsettled journey. Higher Education Policy, 27(1), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, P. (2006). Filleting the transnational education steak. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 283–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. (2003). Quality assurance in transnational education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(4), 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2004). The assessment of quality risks in collaborative provision. Quality in Higher Education, 10(1), 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross-Border Education Research Team. (2017). Branch campus listing (Updated January 20, 2017). Retrieved March 10, 2017 from http://cbert.org/?page_id=34.

  • De Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2004). Strategy: Process, content, context; an international perspective (3rd ed.). London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobos, K. (2011). “Serving two masters”—Academics’ perspectives on working at an offshore campus in Malaysia. Educational Review, 63(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., & Wallace, M. (2004). Australian academics teaching in Singapore: Striving for cultural empathy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., & Wallace, M. (2006). Australian academics and transnational teaching: An exploratory study of their preparedness and experiences. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Crosling, G., & Edwards, R. (2010). Outsourcing university degrees: Implications for quality control. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(3), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egege, S., & Kutieleh, S. (2009). Dimming down difference. In L. Dunn & M. Wallace (Eds.), Teaching in transnational higher education: Enhancing learning for offshore international students (pp. 67–76). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, V., & Worton, M. (2014). Challenges for the leadership of transnational education in higher education: Balancing risk and innovation. London: Leadership Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L., Homer, M., & Rayner, S. (2013). Professors as academic leaders: The perspectives of the ‘led’. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41(5), 674–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J. (2008). The practice of internationalisation: Managing international activities in UK universities. Research Series, 1. London: UK Higher Education International Unit.

  • Fielden, J. (2011). Leadership and management of international partnerships. London: Leadership Foundation and LH Martin Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A., & Alzouebi, K. (2014). Sustainability of international branch campuses in the United Arab Emirates: A vision for the future. The Journal of General Education, 63(2–3), 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, J. (2006). Higher education governance in Europe: Autonomy, ownership and accountability—A review of the literature. In J. Kohler & J. Huber (Eds.), Higher education governance between democratic culture, academic aspirations and market forces (pp. 79–134). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R., Kinser, K., Lane, J., & Merola, R. (2016). International branch campuses: Trends and developments, 2016. Redhill: Observatory for Borderless Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2007). Managing differences: The central challenge of global strategy. Harvard Business Review, 85(3), 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2001). Higher education as a market: A problem or solution? Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, T. (2012). Higher education across borders: Models of engagement and lessons from corporate strategy. Redhill: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/download?id=895.

  • Gow, I. (2007). Removing the rose-tinted spectacles. In A. Fazackerley & P. Worthington (Eds.), British universities in China: The reality beyond the rhetoric (pp. 7–9). London: Agora: The Forum for Culture and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugland, S. (2010). The integration-responsiveness framework and subsidiary management: A commentary. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 94–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, N. (2016). The challenges of leading an international branch campus: The ‘lived experience’ of in-country senior managers. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, T., Morrison, M., Basu, P., & Sweeney, A. (2010). Cultural differences, learning styles and transnational education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, L. (2013). Swimming in the deep end: Transnational teaching as culture learning? Higher Education Research and Development, 32(4), 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, P., & Thomas, H. (2001). Higher education as an international commodity: Ensuring quality in partnerships. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. (2003). Medical journals: Evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty. Lancet, 361(9359), 712–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humfrey, C. (2009). Transnational education and the student experience: A PMI student experience project report. London: UK Council for International Student Affairs. Retrieved November 25, 2012 from http://www.ukcosa.org.uk/files/pdf/pmi/tne_report.pdf.

  • Interbrand. (2014). Best global brands: Rankings 2014. Retrieved October 25, 2014 from http://bestglobalbrands.com/2014/ranking/.

  • Karran, T. (2007). Academic freedom in Europe: A preliminary comparative analysis. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., & Tak, S. (1998). Borderless education and teaching and learning cultures: The case of Hong Kong. Australian Universities’ Review, 41(1), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2004). The scientific impact of nations: What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinser, K., & Lane, J. (2012). Foreign outposts of colleges and universities. International Higher Education, 66, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. (2011). Global expansion of international branch campuses: Managerial and leadership challenges. New Directions for Higher Education, 155, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J., & Kinser, K. (2012). International branch campuses: One definition to rule them all? Retrieved February 6, 2013 from http://chronicle.com/blogs/worldwise/international-branch-campuses-one-definition-to-rule-them-all/29051.

  • Lane, J., & Kinser, K. (2013). Five models of international branch campus facility ownership. International Higher Education, 70, 9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, W., & Katsomitros, A. (2012). International branch campuses: Data and developments. Redhill: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. Retrieved August 22, 2012 from www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/download?id=894.

  • Li, L., & Baalen, P. (2007). Indigenization of management education in China. Higher Education Policy, 20(2), 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, F. (2010). Do too many rights make a wrong? A qualitative study of the experiences of a sample of Malaysian and Singapore private higher education providers in transnational quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 16(3), 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2001). Determinants of local responsiveness: Perspectives from foreign subsidiaries in an emerging market. Journal of Management, 27(4), 451–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man, J., Weinkauf, J., Tsang, M., & Sin, D. (2004). Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. European Journal of Epidemiology, 19(8), 811–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(3), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2011a). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2011b). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2016). Public/private in higher education: A synthesis of economic and political approaches. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1168797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (Ed.) (2007). Cross-border higher education: Regulation, quality assurance and impact. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved June 6, 2012 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001538/153897e.pdf.

  • McBurnie, G., & Pollock, A. (2000). Opportunity and risk in transnational education: Issues in planning for international campus development: An Australian perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 25(3), 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCully, M., McDaniel, E., & Roth, B. (2009). Faculty challenges in educating international students and faculty on their home turf. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning.

  • Natale, S., & Doran, C. (2012). Marketization of education: An ethical dilemma. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S., & Jahdi, K. (2009). Marketisation of education: Marketing, rhetoric and reality. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N., & LeBlanc, G. (2001). Image and reputation of higher education institutions in students’ retention decisions. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(6), 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. (2005). Latest UK branch campus developments: University of Warwick rejects plans for Singapore campus and Liverpool moves into China. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from http://www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/2005/Articles/Latest_UK_branch_campus_developments_University_of_Warwick_rejects_plans_for_Singapore_campus_and_Liverpool_moves_into_China.

  • O’Mahoney, J. (2014). Enhancing student learning and teacher development in transnational education. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opie, C. (Ed.). (2004). Doing educational research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordorika, S. I. (2014). Governance and change in higher education: The debate between classical political sociology, new institutionalism and critical theories. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, 66(1), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Tracey, P., & Karra, N. (2009). Rethinking institutional distance: Strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management. Strategic Organization, 7(3), 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimpa, N. (2009). Learning problems in transnational business education and training: The case of the MBA in Thailand. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(4), 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., & Doz, Y. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, J., & Goddard, J. (2010). Teaching across cultures: Canada and Qatar. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 40(1), 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyvis, D. (2011). The need for context-sensitive measures of educational quality in transnational higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(6), 733–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyvis, D., & Chapman, A. (2005). Culture shock and the international student “offshore”. Journal of Research in International Education, 4(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E., & Seeber, M. (2011). The transformation of steering and governance in higher education: Funding and evaluation as policy instruments. IDEAS Working Paper Series.

  • Redden, E. (2014). Bucking the branch campus. Inside Higher Ed, 12 March. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/03/12/amid-branch-campus-building-boom-some-universities-reject-model.

  • Rhee, J., & Sagaria, M. (2004). International students: Constructions of imperialism in the Chronicle of Higher Education. Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (2001). Managing productivity in an academic institution: Rethinking the whom, which, what, and whose of productivity. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (2014). The higher education we choose, collectively: Reembodying and repoliticizing choice. Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 917–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (2016). Internationalization to what purposes? Marketing to international students. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6(2), 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoten, D., & Calhoun, C. (2011). Knowledge matters: The public mission of the research university. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., & Morrison, A. (1990). An empirical analysis of the integration-responsiveness framework in global industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 541–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams, F., & Huisman, J. (2012). Managing offshore branch campuses: An analytical framework for institutional strategies. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(2), 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2007). Overseas campuses: The management perspective. London: Agora The Forum for Culture and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic moves to the market: The United States and the European Union. Higher Education, 63(5), 583–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2009). Sinking in the sand? Academic work in an offshore campus of an Australian university. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(5), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2010). Assuring quality in transnational higher education: A matter of collaboration or control? Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 793–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2014). Exploring flying faculty teaching experiences: Motivations, challenges and opportunities. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., Weinberger, C., Bruna, E., & Allesina, S. (2014). The scientific impact of nations: Journal placement and citation performance. PLoS ONE, 9(10), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16(2), 180–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steck, H. (2003). Corporatization of the university: Seeking conceptual clarity. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stella, A. (2006). Quality assurance of cross-border higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 12(3), 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J. (1997). An evaluation of the integration-responsiveness framework: MNC manufacturing subsidiaries in the UK. Management International Review, 37(4), 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B., Cantwell, B., & Slaughter, S. (2013). Quasi-markets in US higher education: The humanities and institutional revenues. Journal of Higher Education, 84(5), 675–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. (2001). Academic freedom and organisational identity. Australian Universities’ Review, 44(1–2), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikly, L. (2004). Education and the new imperialism. Comparative Education, 40(2), 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Nottingham Ningbo. (n.d.). International Finance Research Centre. Retrieved March 14, 2015 from http://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/research/centres/international-finance/index.aspx.

  • Wang, T. (2008). Intercultural dialogue and understanding: Implications for teachers. In L. Dunn & M. Wallace (Eds.), Teaching in transnational higher education: Enhancing learning for offshore international students (pp. 57–66). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterval, D., Frambach, J., Driessen, E., & Scherpbier, A. (2014). Copy but not paste: A literature review of crossborder curriculum partnerships. Journal of Studies in International Education. doi:10.1177/1028315314533608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., Balakrishnan, M., & Huisman, J. (2012). Student choice in higher education: Motivations for choosing to study at an international branch campus. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(5), 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2011). Student recruitment at international branch campuses: Can they compete in the global market? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(3), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2012). The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education’. Higher Education, 64(5), 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2013). Student evaluation of university image attractiveness and its impact on student attachment to international branch campuses. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(5), 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, M. (2004). Looking East, looking West: Exploring the views of Hong Kong University students about traditional Chinese cultural values in terms of the delivery of foreign programs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 13(1–2), 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, M. (2005). An evaluation of levels of adaptation used in the teaching of foreign university degree programs in China. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 16(2), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yielder, J., & Codling, A. (2004). Management and leadership in the contemporary university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fiji National University, PO Box 7222, Suva, Fiji

    Nigel Martin Healey

Authors
  1. Nigel Martin Healey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel Martin Healey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Healey, N.M. The Optimal Global Integration–Local Responsiveness Tradeoff for an International Branch Campus. Res High Educ 59, 623–649 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation