Skip to main content
Log in

Public–Private Agreements, Institutions, and Competition: When Economic Theory Meets Facts

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While, in practice, the participation of private actors at the local and national government levels through various types of contractual agreements has been increasing over the last decades, there are still few studies on the functioning and performances of such relationships. Our aim is to highlight some significant theoretical and empirical issues concerning Public–Private Agreements. We first assess the potential sources of efficiency of such contractual agreements. We then examine the selection issue which is a crucial stage for the efficiency of such agreement. Finally, we stress the importance of the institutional framework showing how it might affect the agreements’ efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AECOM Consult, Inc. (2005). Synthesis of public–private partnership projects for roads, bridges and tunnels from around the world, 1985–2004. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation.

  • Asker, J., & Cantillon, E. (2008). Procurement when price and quality matter. Working Paper, 06–24. New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.

  • Athias, L., & Saussier, S. (2009). Contractual flexibility or rigidity for public private partnerships? Theory and evidence from infrastructure concession contracts. Unpublished paper.

  • Bajari P., Tadelis S. (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics 32(3): 387–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajari, P., Houghton, S., & Tadelis, S. (2007). Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of adaptation costs. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper Series 12051).

  • Bajari P., McMillan R., Tadelis S. (2009) Auction versus negotiation in procurement: An empirical analysis. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 25: 372–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker G. P., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. (2008) Strategic alliances: Bridges between islands of conscious power. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 22: 146–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J., Iossa E. (2006) Building and managing facilities for public services. Journal of Public Economics 90: 2143–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc-Brude, F., Goldsmith, H., & Välilä, T. (2007). Public–private partnerships in Europe: An update. European Investment Bank & Financial Report No. 2007/03.

  • Branco F. (1997) The design of multidimensional auctions. Rand Journal of Economics 28: 63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E., & Saussier, S., (2009). Contracting with governments. In J. A. Nickerson, & B. S. Silverman (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (vol. 26, pp. 487–522). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Bullow J., Klemperer P. (1996) Auction versus negotiation. American Economic Review 86: 180–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Burguet R., Che Y.-K. (2004) Competitive procurement with corruption. Rand Journal of Economics 35: 50–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzolari, G., & Spagnolo, G. (2009). Relational procurement, Unpublished paper.

  • Che Y.-K. (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. Rand Journal of Economics 24: 668–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong E., Huet F., Saussier F., Steiner F. (2006) Public private partnerships and prices: Evidence from water distribution in France. Review of Industrial Organization 29(1–2): 149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, E., Staropoli, C., & Yvrande-Billon, A. (2009). Auction versus negotiation in public procurement: Looking for new empirical evidence. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Coase R. H. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker K. J., Masten S. E. (1996) Regulation and administered contracts revisited: Lessons from transaction-cost economics for public utility regulation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 9: 5–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bó E. (2006) Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic policy 22(2): 203–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bettignies J., Ross T. (2009) Public–private partnerships and the privatization of the finance function: An incomplete contracts approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization 27: 358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva D. G., Dunne T., Kankanamge A., Kosmopoulou G. (2008) The impact of public information on bidding in highway procurement auctions. European Economic Review 52: 150–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva D. G., Kosmopoulou G., Lamarche C. (2009) The effect of information on the bidding and survival of entrants in procurement auctions. Journal of Public Economics 93: 58–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrieux, C., Chong, E., & Saussier, S., (2009). Putting all one’s eggs in one basket: Relational contracts and the provision of local public services. Unpublished paper. Retrieved July 21 2009 from: http://www.webssa.net/files/BundlingFV-July09_0.pdf.

  • Doni, N. (2007). A comparison of alternative procedures for the selection of the private partner in PPP projects. Working Paper No. 10/2007. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università degli Studi di Firenze.

  • Engel E., Fischer R., Galetovic A. (1997) Highway franchising: Pitfalls and opportunities. American Economic Review 87(2): 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, E., Fischer, R., & Galetovic, A. (2006). Renegotiation without holdup: Anticipating spending and infrastructure concessions. NBER Working Paper No. 12339.

  • Engel, E., Fischer, R., & Galetovic, A. (2009). Public-private partnerships: When and how? SCIP working paper 379.

  • Estache A. (2006) PPI partnerships vs. PPI divorces in LDCs. Review of Industrial Organization 29: 3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache A., Wren-Lewis L. (2009) Towards a theory of regulation for developing countries: Insights from Jean-Jacques Laffont’s last book. Journal of Economic Literature 47(3): 729–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Europe Economics. (2006). Evaluation of public procurement directives. European Commission, DG Internal Market.

  • Gibbons R. (2005) Four formal(izable) theories of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58: 202–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, R., & Marion, J. (2009). The role of repeated interactions, self-enforcing agreements and relational [sub]contracting: Evidence from California highway procurement auctions. Unpublished paper. Retrieved from http://people.ucsc.edu/~rgil/Gil_Marion_Oct09.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2009.

  • Goldberg V. P. (1977) Competitive bidding and the production of precontract information. Bell Journal of Economics 8: 250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J. L. (2004) Granting and renegotiating infrastructure contracts: Doing it rights. The World Bank Institute, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J. L., Laffont J.-L., Straub S. (2006) Renegotiation of concession contracts: A theoretical approach. Review of Industrial Organization 29: 55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J. L., Laffont J.-L., Straub S. (2007) Concessions of infrastructure in Latin America: Government-led renegotiation. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(7): 1267–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J. L., Laffont J.-L., Straub S. (2008) Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26(2): 421–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J.-L., Straub S. (2009) Corruption and concession renegotiations: Evidence from the water and transport sectors in Latin America. Utilities Policy 19(2): 185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O. D. (2003) Incomplete contract and public ownership: Remarks and an application to public–private partnerships.. Economic Journal 113: 69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O. D., Tirole J. (1988) Contract renegotiation and Coasian dynamics. Review of Economic Studies 55: 509–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz W. (2002) The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(2): 355–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2006). PFI: Strengthening long-term partnerships. London: The Stationay Office.

  • Iossa, E., & Martimort, D. (2008). The simple micro-economics of public-private partnerships. CEIS Working Paper No. 139. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1271082. Accessed 12 Oct 2009.

  • Laffont J.-J. (2005) Regulation and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. (1987) Auctioning incentive contracts. Journal of Political Economy 95(5): 921–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. (1990) Adverse selection and renegotiation in procurement. Review of Economic Studies 75: 597–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine F., Slade M. (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 45(3): 629–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & Tadelis, S. (2009). Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from US cities. Journal of Industrial Economics, forthcoming.

  • Levy B., Spiller P. T. (1994) The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 10(2): 201–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Manelli A., Vincent D. R. (1995) Optimal procurement mechanisms. Econometrica 63(3): 591–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall R. C., Marx L. M. (2009) The vulnerability of auctions to bidder collusion. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(2): 883–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martimort, D. (2008). Introduction to the IJIO symposium on public/private partnerships. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26 iii–iv.

  • Maskin E., Tirole J. (2008) Public–private partnerships and government spending limits. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26(2): 412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. (1987) Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature 25: 699–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P. (2004) Putting auction theory to work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., Weber R. J. (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50: 463–483

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2001) Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI project. London: The Stationery Office.

  • National Audit Office (2007) Improving the PFI tendering process. London: The Stationery Office.

  • North D. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti E. C. (1995) Credible privatization. American Economic Review 85(4): 847–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S. (1999) Corruption and government: Causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller P. T. (1996) Institutions and commitment. Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 421–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P. T. (2008). An institutional theory of public contracts: Regulatory implications. NBER Working Paper No. 14152.

  • Williamson O. E. (1976) Franchise bidding for natural monopolies. In general and with respect to CATV. Bell Journal of Economics 7: 73–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O. E. (1999) Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 15(1): 306–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yescombe E. (2007) Public private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Saussier.

Additional information

The papers in this special issue of the Review of Industrial Organization originated with an international conference on “Public Private Contracts, Competition and Institutions” held at the University of Paris I Sorbonne, in December 2007. The purpose of this conference was to confront alternative theoretical approaches and empirical developments on this topic.

This special issue reflects this objective of balancing normative and positive approaches. It indeed provides a collection of papers dealing with how public–private contracts are shaped, their advantages and drawbacks, why and when they should be used, and how they affect performances. To some extent, it is a useful complement to another special issue on public–private partnerships already edited in this journal (Review of Industrial Organization, 2006, Volume 29, Numbers 1–2).

This special issue is the result of a collective work. We thank all of the participants to the conference for lively presentations and discussion. We are also particularly grateful to: Miguel Amaral, Laure Athias, David Azéma, François Bergères, Jean Beuve, Eric Brousseau, Julie de Brux, Claudine Desrieux, Aleksandra Domanski, Freddy Huet, Marie-Joëlle Kodjovi, Aude Le Lannier, Claude Martinand, Jean-Michel Oudot, Vincent Piron, and Steven Tadelis. We would also like to extend special thanks to the European School of New Institutional Economics (Esnie), the Grale, the French Institute for public–private partnerships (IGD), the University of Paris XI-Sud, the University of Paris I Sorbonne, the Roland-Berger Consulting Group, the French PPP task force (MAPPP—Ministry of Finance) and the Vinci-Concession Company who sponsored the conference. At last, we would like to express our gratitude to the referees for their reports and recommendations as well as the Review of Industrial Organization for its help and encouragement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saussier, S., Staropoli, C. & Yvrande-Billon, A. Public–Private Agreements, Institutions, and Competition: When Economic Theory Meets Facts. Rev Ind Organ 35, 1–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9226-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9226-z

Keywords

Navigation