Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual orientation discrimination in the labor market against gay men

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study replicates the first European field experiment on gay men’s labor market prospects in Greece. Utilizing the same protocol as the original study in 2006–2007, two follow-up field experiments took place in 2013–2014 and 2018–2019. The study estimated that gay men experienced occupational access constraints and wage sorting in vacancies offering lower remuneration. It was found that in 2013–2014 and 2018–2019, gay men experienced increasingly biased treatment compared to 2006–2007. Moreover, the results suggested that monthly unemployment bore an association with occupational access constraints and wage sorting in vacancies offering lower remuneration for gay men. In each of the three experiments, this study captured recruiters’ attitudes toward gay men. A one standard deviation increase in taste-discrimination attitudes against gay men decreased their access to occupations by 9.6%. Furthermore, a one standard deviation increase in statistical-discrimination attitudes against gay men decreased their access to occupations by 8.1%. According to the findings, in 2013–2014 and 2018–2019, firms excluding gay applicants expressed a higher level of taste- and statistical-discrimination attitudes compared to 2006–2007. A gay rights backlash due to the LGBTIQ+ group’s attempt to advance its agenda, rising far-right rhetoric, and prejudice associated with economic downturns experienced in Greece might correspond with increasing biases against gay men. The current study contributes to the economics of sexual orientation when an economy deteriorates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Examples from the popular press include BBC News, 2 October 2013; The Guardian, 7 September 2014; The New York Times, 5 October 2015; Deutsche Welle, 2 May 2017; The EU Observer, 28 Mai 2018; TRT World, 19 April 2019; The Independent, 1 March 2019.

  2. In the 2012 parliamentary elections the party won 7% of the vote, finished third in the 2014 European elections (9.4%), and gained third place in the parliamentary elections of 2015 (6.4%). During the 2019 European elections the political party won 4.8% of the vote and during the 2019 parliamentary election lost all of its seats in the Hellenic Parliament, winning only 2.93% of the vote.

  3. Information on monthly unemployment per sector was not available.

  4. The RAG index is given by: RAG index=\(\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i = 1}^5 {items_i/5}\)

  5. Firms inviting both heterosexual and gay applicants for an interview: The RAG index in Experiment I vs the RAG index in Experiment II: t = −1.39 (p > 0.10); The RAG index in Experiment I vs the RAG index in Experiment III: t = −1.46 (p > 0.10); The RAG index in Experiment II vs the RAG index in Experiment III: t = −1.21 (p > 0.10).

  6. Firms inviting only heterosexual applicants for an interview: The RAG index in Experiment I vs the RAG index in Experiment II: t = −6.0 (p < 0.01); The RAG index in Experiment I vs the RAG index in Experiment III: t = −6.55 (p < 0.01); The RAG index in Experiment II vs the RAG index in Experiment III: t = 0.5 (p > 0.10).

  7. The RAG item no. 1 in Experiment I vs the RAG item no. 1 in Experiment II: t = −6.2 (p < 0.01); The RAG item no 1. in Experiment I vs the RAG item no. 1 in Experiment III: t = −5.8 (p < 0.01).

  8. The RAG item no. 4 in Experiment I vs the RAG item no. 4 in Experiment II: t = −6.4 (p < 0.01); The RAG item no. 4 in Experiment I vs the RAG item no. 4 in Experiment III: t = −6.0 (p < 0.01).

  9. Due to multicollinearity and overfitting, this study cannot include in the models, interaction effects between the RAG index and time controls.

References

  • Ahmed, A. M., Andersson, L., & Hammarstedt, M. (2013). Are gay men and lesbians discriminated against in the hiring process? Southern Economic Journal, 79(3), 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter & A. Rees (Eds), Discrimination in labor markets (pp. 3–42). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1998). What has economics to say about racial discrimination? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. V. L. (2020). The economic case for lgbt equality. why fair and equal treatment benefits us all. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, S. (2018). Hiring discrimination: an overview of (almost) all correspondence experiments since 2005. In M. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance (pp. 63–77). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, E. C. (2016). American individualism rises and falls with the economy: cross-temporal evidence that individualism declines when the economy falters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 567–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, E. C., Hall, E. V., & Lee, S. (2018). Reexamining the link between economic downturns and racial antipathy: evidence that prejudice against blacks rises during recessions. Psychological Science, 29(10), 1584–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, J., & Hamermesh, D. (2013). Wage discrimination over the business cycle. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishin, B. G., Hayes, T. J., Incantalupo, M. B., & Smith, C. A. (2016). Opinion backlash and public attitudes: are political advances in gay rights counterproductive? American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A. (2017). Pay equity after the equality act 2010: does sexual orientation still matter? Work, Employment and Society, 31(3), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, F., & Coleman, W. J. (2013). On the theory of ethnic conflict. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 161–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carastathis, A. (2015). The politics of austerity and the affective economy of hostility: racialised gendered violence and crises of belonging in Greece. Feminist Review, 109(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culhane, G. J., & Sobel, L. S. (2013). The gay marriage backlash and its spillover effects: lessons from a (slightly) blue state. Tulsa Law Review, 40(3), 443–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhommer, S. (2020). Effect of state and local sexual orientation anti-discrimination laws on labor market differentials. Social Science Research Network SSRN: June, 16, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978–1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Glitz, A., & Vogel, T. (2010). Employment, wages, and the economic cycle: differences between immigrants and natives. European Economic Review, 54(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabble, L. A., Wootton, A. R., Veldhuis, C. B., Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Lannutti, P. J., Balsam, K. F., & Hughes, T. L. (2021). Perceived psychosocial impacts of legalized same-sex marriage: a scoping review of sexual minority adults’ experiences. PLoS ONE, 16(5), e0249125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2009). Sexual orientation discrimination in the labour market. Labour Economics, 16(4), 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2011). Women’s sexual orientation and labor market outcomes in Greece. Feminist Economics, 11(1), 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2012). Sexual orientation and labour relations new evidence from Athens, Greece. Applied Economics, 44(20), 2653–2665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2014). Sexual orientation discrimination in the cypriot labour market. tastes or uncertainty? International Journal of Manpower, 35(5), 720–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2015a). Measuring sexual orientation discrimination in the UK’s labour market; a field experiment. Human Relations, 68(11), 1769–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2015b). Effect of sexual orientation on job satisfaction: evidence from Greece. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 54(1), 162–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2015c). The effect of unemployment on self-reported health and mental health in Greece from 2008 to 2013: a longitudinal study before and during the financial crisis. Social Science and Medicine, 128, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2018). Economic pluralism in the study of wage discrimination: a note. International Journal of Manpower, 39(4), 631–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2019). Sexual Orientation and Labor Market Outcomes. IZA World of Labor No 111.v2. Bonn: IZA World of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. & Zimmermann, K. F. (2020). Editorial. Sexual orientation, gender identity and labour market outcomes: new patterns and insights. International Journal of Manpower, 41(6), 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drydakis, N. (2021, in-print). Sexual orientation and earnings. a meta-analysis 2012-2020. Journal of Population Economics.

  • Eurobarometer. (2019). Special Eurobarometer 493. Discrimination in the European Union: The Social Acceptance of LGBTI People in the EU. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights FRA. (2020). A Long Way to Go for LGBTI Equality. Brussels: FRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2019). Greece: Unemployment Rate. Luxemburg: Statistical Office of the European Commission.

  • Eleftheriadis, K. (2015). Queer responses to austerity: insights from the Greece of crisis. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(4), 1032–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriadis, K. (2017). Cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and sexual politics in the European periphery: a multiscalar analysis of gay prides in Thessaloniki, Greece’. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 30(4), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encarnación, G. O. (2020). The gay rights backlash: contrasting views from the United States and Latin America. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 654–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., Kuhn, A., & Zweimuller, J. (2011). Unemployment and right-wing extremist crime. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(2), 260–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fejes, F. (2008). Gay Rights and Moral Panic: The Origin of America’s Debate on Homosexuality. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flage, A. (2020). Discrimination against gays and lesbians in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 41(6), 671–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayadev, A., & Johnson, R. (2017). Tides and prejudice: racial attitudes during downturns in the United States 1979–2014. Review of Black Political Economy, 44, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I., & Cooper, D. (2015). LGBT diversity: show me the business case. Utrecht: Out Now.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. W., & Lordan, G. (2016). Racial prejudice and labour market penalties during economic downturns. European Economic Review, 84(May), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarstedt, M., Ahmed, A. M., & Andersson, L. (2015). Sexual prejudice and labor market outcomes for Gays and Lesbians: evidence from Sweden. Feminist Economics, 21(1), 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffnar, E., & Greene, M. (1996). Gender discrimination in the public and private sectors: a sample selectivity approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 25(1), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., Atif, M., Ahmed, A., & Mia, L. (2020). Do LGBT workplace diversity policies create value for firms? Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 775–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2013). Greece: Ex Post Evaluation of Exceptional Access Under the 2010 Stand by Arrangement. No. 13/156. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara, O. (2006). Occupational gender wage discrimination in Turkey. Journal of Economic Studies, 33(2), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosch, A. R., & Amodio, D. M. (2019). Scarcity disrupts the neural encoding of black faces: a socioperceptual pathway to discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 859–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, T., & Mihoubi, F. (2012). sexual orientation and wage discrimination in France: the hidden side of the rainbow. Journal of Labor Research, 33, 487–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, A. R., & Campbell, T. D. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, M. (2020). Age and the New Lesbian earnings penalty. International Journal of Manpower, 41(6), 649–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? a cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 510–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D. (2018). Experimental research on labor market discrimination. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 799–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racist Violence Recording Network. (2018). Annual Report: 2018. Athens: Racist Violence Recording Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The Economic Journal, 112(483), 480–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). Society at a Glance 2019. OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreffice, S. (2011). Sexual orientation and household decision making. same-sex couples balance of power and labor supply choices. Labour Economics, 18(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patacchini, E., Ragusa, G., & Zenou, Y. (2015). Unexplored dimensions of discrimination in Europe: homosexuality and physical appearance. Journal of Population Economics, 28, 1045–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, D. (2014). The Golden Dawn and the Extreme Right in Greece. E-International Relations, March: 1–4.

  • Papanastasiou, S., & Papatheodorou, C. (2018). The greek depression: poverty outcomes and welfare responses. Journal of Economics and Business, XXI(1-2), 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, D., & Kolocotroni, V. (2018). New queer greece: performance, politics and identity in crisis. Journal of Greek Media and Culture, 4(2), 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, D. (2018). Critically queer and haunted: greek identity, crisiscapes and doing queer history in the present. Journal of Greek Media and Culture, 4(2), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papatheodorou, C. (2014). Economic crisis, poverty and deprivation in greece. the impact of neoliberal remedies. In S. Mavroudeas (Ed.), Greek Capitalism in Crisis: Marxist Analyses (pp. 179–195). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. C., & Feng, C. (2021). LGBT workplace equality policy and customer satisfaction: the roles of marketing capability and demand instability. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 40(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. (1972). The statistical theory of Racism and Sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarras, D. (2015). Golden Dawn on Trial. Athens: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, K. (2008). Gender backlash in American Politics? Politics and Gender, 4, 634–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, L., Fu, S., & Zheng, L. (2016). Corporate sexual equality and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1812–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sroiter, A. (2014). Autopsy: Homophobic Attacks. Athens: Alpha TV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2012). Reputation, social identity and social conflict. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 14(4), 677–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7), 778–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilcsik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: employment discrimination against openly Gay Men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(2), 586–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2014). Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valfort, A. M. (2020). Over the Rainbow? The Road to LGBTI Inclusion. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulou, S., & Halikiopoulou, D. (2015). The Golden Dawn’s ‘Nationalist Solution’: Explaining the Rise of the Far Right in Greece. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, E. D., Huyser, K. R., Ybarra, V. D., Hollis, J., & Sanchez, G. R. (2018). The influence of the great recession on racial attitudes among Non-Hispanic Whites in the United States. Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, 1, 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Gunderson, M., & Wicks, D. (2018). The earnings effect of sexual orientation: British evidence from worker-firm matched data. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 744–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichselbaumer, D. (2003). Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring. Labour Economics, 10, 629–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavodny, M. (2008). Is there a marriage premium For Gay Men? Review of the Economics of the Household, 6, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the time and effort that the Editors Shoshana Grossbard and Sonia Oreffice and two anonymous reviewers dedicated to provide feedback on the manuscript. The suggestions offered by the reviewers have been immensely helpful. The data appendix, codes and software tables have been provided to the Editors during the submission process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Drydakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix. Greece. Macroeconomic indicators, LGBTIQ+ acceptance indicators and politics

Appendix. Greece. Macroeconomic indicators, LGBTIQ+ acceptance indicators and politics

Macroeconomic indicators

LGBTIQ+ acceptance indicators

Far-right political party

Institutional policies

In 20062007, the unemployment rate was 8.7%, the GDP was 295.9b, the growth rate was 4.5%, the rate of people living at risk of poverty or social exclusion was 20%. (1)

  

In January 2005 the 3304/2005 Law combated discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in the workplace. (9,10)

In 20132014, the unemployment rate was 26.9%,the GDP was 238.4b, the growth rate was −1.2%, the rate of people living at risk of poverty or social exclusion was 35.1%. (1)

In 20122014, verbal abuse and physical violence against LGBTIQ+ people increased. Organized street gangs were formed, and persecutions against LGBTIQ+ people took place across the country. (2) Between 2013 and 2019, reportages in the popular international press indicated that homophobia escalated. (3)

In the 2012 parliamentary elections a far-right political party won 7% of the vote, finished third in the 2014 European elections (9.4%), and gained third place in the parliamentary elections of 2015 (6.4%). (8)

In December 2015, the 4356/2015 Law legalized same-sex partnerships. (9,10)

In 20182019, the unemployment rate was 18.2%, the GDP was 213.9b, the growth rate was 1.8%, the rate of people living at risk of poverty or social exclusion was 31.8%. (1)

The 2018 annual report of the Racist Violence Recording Network revealed increased homophobic attacks, aggressiveness, and anger since 2015. (4)

During the 2019 European elections the far-right political party won 4.8% of the vote and during the 2019 parliamentary election lost all of its seats in the Hellenic Parliament, winning only 2.9% of the vote. (8)

In October 2017 the 4491/2017 Law permitted people to legally change their gender on all official documents without undergoing sterilization. (9,10)

 

The 2019 OECD report found that the country experienced a decreased acceptance of homosexuality. (5)

In October 2020, a court ruled that nearly the entire leadership of the far-right political party will be imprisoned for operating a criminal gang under the guise of being a political party. (8)

 
 

The 2019 Eurobarometer survey suggested that more homophobia existed in Greece than the EU28 average. (6)

  
 

The 2020 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights survey indicated that the shares of EU respondents who felt discriminated against were highest in Greece. (7)

  

Notes: Resources (1): Eurostat database, World Bank database, Hellenic Statistical Authority database. (2) Sroiter, A. (2014). Autopsy: Homophobic Attacks. Athens: Alpha TV. (3) BBC News, 2 October 2013; The Guardian, 7 September 2014; The New York Times, 5 October 2015; Deutsche Welle, 2 May 2017; The EU Observer, 28 Mai 2018; TRT World, 19 April 2019; The Independent, 1 March 2019. (4) Racist Violence Recording Network (2018). Annual Report: 2018. Athens: Racist Violence Recording Network. (5) OECD (2019). Society at a Glance 2019. OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD. (6) Eurobarometer (2019). Special Eurobarometer 493. Discrimination in the European Union: The Social Acceptance of LGBTI People in the EU. Brussels: European Commission. (7) European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA 2020). A Long Way to Go for LGBTI Equality. Brussels: FRA. (8) The New York Times, 7 October 2020; BBC News, 7 October 2020; CNN News, 8 October 2020. (9) The Guardian, 23 December 2015. (10) The Guardian, 10 October 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drydakis, N. Sexual orientation discrimination in the labor market against gay men. Rev Econ Household 20, 1027–1058 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-021-09581-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-021-09581-8

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation