Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of pre-service teachers’ receptive vocabulary knowledge on their interactive read-alouds with elementary school students

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are individual differences in the amount and type of vocabulary that adults produce to young children in the home environment before the children enter school. How many words a mother knows is a significant predictor of a child’s vocabulary. The current study addressed the question of whether there were individual differences in the amount and type of vocabulary that pre-service teachers produced in their first read-aloud lessons to first and second grade students. Specifically, would pre-service teachers with higher vocabulary scores differ from those with lower vocabulary scores in their choice of books to read and in the language they used to discuss the books? Results indicated that pre-service teachers with more advanced vocabulary scores chose books with more vocabulary diversity and sophistication. When they chose narrative texts, they also chose books that were more difficult in terms of their semantic cohesion. Both the receptive vocabulary of pre-service teachers and the language in the books that they chose had an effect on the “teacher talk” that they used in the lesson surrounding the book reading. Just as parents show individual differences in the richness of the language input provided to their children before they enter school, pre-service teachers own knowledge of language varies, and this influences the linguistic input that they provide to their students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, M., Cobb, C., & Giampietro, P. (2005). Verbal ability and teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55, 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2007). Increasing young low income children’s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction. Elementary School Journal, 107, 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2003). Oral comprehension sets the ceiling on reading comprehension. American Educator, 27, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, E., & Lynch-Brown, C. (2002). Effects of teachers’ reading-aloud styles on vocabulary acquisition and comprehension of students in the early elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 465–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breland, H. (1996). Word frequency and word difficulty: A comparison of counts in four corpora. Psychological Science, 7, 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breland, H. M., Jones, R. J., & Jenkins, L. (1994). The college board vocabulary study (College Board Report No. 94–4, Educational Testing Service Research Report No. 94–26). New York College Entrance Examination Board.

  • Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. New York: American Heritage Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., Jakobsons, L., Crowe, E., & Majors, J. G. (2009a). Instruction, student engagement, and reading skill growth in Reading First classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 221–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., Morrison, F., & Katch, L. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., Piasta, S., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E., et al. (2009b). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child × instruction interactions on first graders’ literacy development. Child Development, 80, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R., & Surber, J. R. (2010) The reading level paradox: Why children’s picture books are less cohesive than adult books. Discourse Processes (in press).

  • Dickinson, D., McCabe, A., & Anastasopoulos, L. (2003). A framework for examining book reading in early childhood classrooms. In A. van Kleeck & S. Stahl (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 95–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Smith, M. W. (1994). Long-term effects of preschool teachers’ book readings on low-income children’s vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Tabors, P. O. (2001). Beginning literacy with language. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, H. (1974). The rationale, development, and standardisation of a basic word vocabulary test. A methodological report on the conceptual representation and measurement of American-English basic word vocabulary acquisition. Vital and Health Statistics, 2(60), 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Heath, & Human Development, NIH, DHHS. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: Reports of the Subgroups. (00475). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs_details.cfm?from=&pubs_id=88.

  • Ferguson, R., & Ladd, H. (1996). How and why money matters. An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable. Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265–298). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. Adger, C. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–53). Washington, DC and McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–114). NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A., Millis, K., & Zwaan, R. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, A., & Wasik, B. (2006). Bringing words to life: Optimizing book reading experiences to develop vocabulary in young children. In A. van Kleeck (Ed.), Sharing books and stories to promote language and literacy (pp. 231–268). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurry, J., Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Pretzlik, U., Parker, M., Curno, T., et al. (2005). Transforming research on morphology into teacher practice. Research Papers in Education, 20, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J. (1998). Language input and language growth. Preventive Medicine, 27, 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice, L., Meier, J., & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, D., Sternberg, R., & Fonseca, L. (1987). Verbal comprehension: The lexical decomposition strategy to define unfamiliar words. Intelligence, 11, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keats, E. (1962). The snowy day. New York: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderholm, T., Everson, M., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 525–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louwerse, M., McCarthy, P., McNamara, D. S., & Graesser, A. (2004). Variation inlanguage and cohesion across written and spoken registers. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 843–848). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maag, L. (2007) Measuring morphological awareness in adult readers: Implications for vocabulary development. Unpublished dissertation, University of Florida.

  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project. Tools for analyzing talk. Volume 1: Transcription format and programs (3rd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Duran, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development. Quantification and assessment. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W.-Y., & Shu, H. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P., Graesser, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2006). Distinguishing genres using Coh-Metrix indices of cohesion. Paper presented at the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, July.

  • McGill-Franzen, A., Lanford, C., & Adams, E. (2002). Learning to be literate: A comparison of five urban early childhood programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).

  • Pan, B., Rowe, M., Singer, J., & Snow, C. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76, 763–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P., & Alfano, M. (2005). Teachers’ literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 266–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S., & Nagy, W. (2006). Teaching word meanings. NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, S., & Whitehurst, G. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabors, P., Beals, D., & Weizman, Z. (2001a). You know what Oxygen is? Learning new words at home. In D. Dickinson & P. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language. Young children learning at home and school (pp. 93–110). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabors, P., Snow, C., & Dickinson, D. (2001b). Homes and schools together: Supporting language and literacy development. In D. Dickinson & P. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school (pp. 313–334). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30, 000 words. New York: Bureau of Publications Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tivnan, T., & Hemphill, L. (2005). Comparing four literacy reform models in high-poverty schools: Patterns of first-grade achievement. Elementary School Journal, 105(5), 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B., & Bond, M. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Websters Third International Dictionary of the English Language. Unabridged. (1961). Springfield, Mass: G. & C. Merriam Co.

  • Weizman, Z., & Snow, C. (2001). Lexical input as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the indicators of quality. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The Report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 157–260). NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Psychology, Enderis 749, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA

    Roberta Corrigan

Authors
  1. Roberta Corrigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Corrigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corrigan, R. Effects of pre-service teachers’ receptive vocabulary knowledge on their interactive read-alouds with elementary school students. Read Writ 24, 749–771 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9223-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9223-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation