Abstract
Soluble corn fiber (SCF) has demonstrated prebiotic effects in clinical studies. Using an in vitro mucosal simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (M-SHIME®) model, the effects of SCF treatment on colonic microbiota composition and metabolic activity and on host-microbiome interactions were evaluated using fecal samples from healthy donors of different ages (baby [≤ 2 years], n = 4; adult [18–45 years], n = 2; elderly [70 years], n = 1). During the 3-week treatment period, M-SHIME® systems were supplemented with SCF daily (baby, 1.5, 3, or 4.5 g/d; adult, 3 or 8.5 g/d; and elderly, 8.5 g/d). M-SHIME® supernatants were evaluated for their effect on the intestinal epithelial cell barrier and inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide. (LPS)-stimulated cells. Additionally, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production and microbial community composition were assessed. In the baby and adult models, M-SHIME® supernatants from SCF treated vessels protected Caco-2 membrane integrity from LPS-induced damage. SCF treatment resulted in the expansion of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Bifidobacterial, as well as increased SCFA production in all age groups. SCF tended to have the greatest effect on propionate production. These findings demonstrate the prebiotic potential of SCF in babies, adults, and the elderly and provide insight into the mechanisms behind the observed prebiotic effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
A healthy gut microbiome that is stable, highly diverse, and resistant to stress-related changes is important to human health [1]. Under healthy conditions, gut bacteria are involved in the metabolism of nutrients, immunomodulation, maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity, and protection from pathogenic bacteria [2]. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to several gastrointestinal conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, obesity, and type 2 diabetes [3].
Dietary intake is one of several environmental factors that can influence the composition of the gut microbiome. For example, a study comparing the fecal microbiota of European children who ate a typical western diet (i.e., high in animal protein, sugar, starch, and fat and low in fiber), and children from an African village in Burkina Faso who ate a predominantly vegetarian diet (i.e., high in starch, fiber, and plant polysaccharides, and low in fat and animal protein) reported notable differences [4]. These differences included a significant increase in the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio in the children who ate a mostly vegetarian diet versus those who ate a European diet. Thus, dietary modulation provides a potential opportunity to modify gut microbiome composition and function.
Prebiotics are non-digestible oligosaccharides that are fermented by saccharolytic bacteria in the large intestine [5], and also provide health benefits via their effects on the intestinal microbial community. They have been defined by The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics as “a substrate that is selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit” and include dietary fibers that meet this criterion such as oligosaccharides (e.g., human milk oligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides, inulin, galactooligosaccharides and resistant dextrins), polyunsaturated fatty acid, conjugated linoleic acid, phenolics, and phytochemicals [5]. Members of the gut microbiota break down prebiotics to generate energy and produce metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), which are beneficial to human health [5].
Soluble corn fiber (SCF) is a highly soluble fiber that has demonstrated prebiotic effects [6]. A clinical study reported a significant increase in Bifidobacterium spp. in healthy men who consumed 21 g/d SCF for 21 days versus those who did not [7]. This change was considered to be beneficial, as it is well established that members of this bacterial genus confer positive health benefits to the human host, such as the production of beneficial metabolites (e.g., SCFAs and vitamins), immune system modulation, and protection against pathogens [8]. Studies have shown that SCF has good digestive tolerance [7, 9, 10], improves laxation [7, 10], has favorable blood glucose and insulin response [11], improves calcium absorption and bone calcium reabsorption [12, 13], and has potential synbiotic effects [14].
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of SCF on host-microbiome interactions and the metabolic activity and composition of the colonic microbiota using a mucosal simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (M-SHIME®) in vitro model with fecal samples from healthy individual donors from different age groups (baby, adult, elderly).
Materials and Methods
This section is presented as supplementary material.
Results and Discussion
SCF treatment resulted in age-dependent changes to the epithelial barrier function and immune markers, suggesting a significant effect of SCF supplementation on host-microbiome interplay (Fig. 1).
SCF treatment resulted in the protection of the Caco-2 membrane integrity in the baby and adult models, but not in the elderly model (Figs. 2 and 3). This observation could be linked to higher basal butyrate levels in the elderly donor, ~ 17–20 mmol/L, compared to adult or baby donors (~ 8–12 mmol/L). It has been previously reported that microbial-derived butyrate augments intestinal barrier function via stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), acting as histone deacetylase inhibitor, and affecting multiple tight junction proteins [15]. High levels of butyrate during the control period could already reinforce the epithelial barrier, protect from LPS-induced damage and mask effects of SCF supplementation.
These differences in butyrate production are likely linked to differences in dietary patterns and interpersonal microbiota background, suggesting that potential effects of SCF supplementation should be evaluated under a personalized perspective.
In all three models, there were increases in Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Bifidobacteria with treatment, though there was variability among the models and between donors. Treatment resulted in increased SCFA production in all three models, with the increase in propionate being most pronounced in the baby and adult models. Notably, to the authors best knowledge, this is the first report on the effects of SCF on the baby gut microbiome (Fig. 4).
SCF has demonstrated prebiotic effects in human studies. For example, Bifidobacteria numbers were increased in the feces of healthy adults after 14 or 21 days of treatment with SCF [7, 16]. An increase in Bifidobacteria is considered a shift towards a healthier gut microbiota [17] and is therefore expected to confer health benefits. Using the M-SHIME® model, we show that SCF supports the growth of Bifidobacteria in the baby and elderly gut microbiota and adds to the previously published evidence of this prebiotic effect in the adult gut microbiota [7, 16]. SCF treatment also resulted in higher numbers of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (Fig. 5).
SCF was fermented in the colonic compartments of all three models as evidenced by the increased SCFA levels with SCF treatment. The observed SCFA increases are likely explained by the increase in Bifidobacteria species, which produce mainly acetate [18], Firmicutes, which produce mainly butyrate [19], and Bacteroidetes, which produce mainly succinate and acetate [20]. The succinate pathway is the most abundant route for propionate formation from hexoses and it is mostly present in the phylum Bacteroidetes, although some Negativicutes can form propionate from succinate as well. Therefore, the increase in Bacteroidetes likely explains the elevated propionate levels [19, 21].
SCFAs are an important energy source for intestinal epithelial cells and contribute to gut membrane barrier integrity [22]. Using in vitro models, butyrate and propionate have been shown to increase TEER, which indicates a role in improving gut membrane integrity [22]. The increased SCFA production observed in our study is likely responsible for the protective effect on the membrane integrity of intestinal epithelial cells observed with supernatants collected from the baby and adult models (Fig. 6, Supplementary Fig. S6 and Supplementary Table S17). Butyrate is the preferred substrate for colonocytes and is thought to promote a normal phenotype in these cells and regulate their energy metabolism [23]. Both butyrate and propionate are reported to have anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties [24,25,26] and to be involved in mitigating weight gain [24, 27]. Additionally, propionate protects from hypertensive cardiovascular damage [28], mediates resistance to Salmonella colonization [29], and lowers lipidogenesis and serum cholesterol levels [33]. A previous study evaluating a synbiotic combination of SCF and the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-PB12 showed a decrease in both total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia; however, they did not evaluate SCFA production during treatment [14]. While all three tested SCFAs increased with SCF treatment, the greatest increase was observed for propionate. Previous research has shown that SCF treatment results in increased SCFA production. In mice fed a high-fat diet, SCF supplementation significantly increased propionate and butyrate levels versus mice fed a high-fat diet alone [30]. The same study showed that SCF affected weight gain in mice fed a high-fat diet; supplementation with SCF resulted in significantly lower body weight compared with consumption of a high-fat diet alone. Additionally, SCF has been shown to significantly increase the level of acetate and propionate in the cecum of piglets [31]. The findings of the present study confirm the ability of SCF to increase SCFA production and provides a mechanism for this increase which may be explained by the changes observed in the microbial community composition with SCF treatment.
SCFAs are reported to have anti-inflammatory activity via modulation of inflammatory mediator production by macrophages [26]. Among the SCFAs, butyrate is the most active in suppressing LPS-induced TNFα and IL-6 and enhancing the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [26]. IL-10 production was overall enhanced in this study, with the exception of adult B donor, supporting the previous link between fiber intake, microbiota-derived metabolites and cytokine regulation in the host. In the baby M-SHIME® experiments, there was little effect overall of SCF treated supernatants on the cytokine/chemokine production or NFκB activity after cells were stimulated with LPS. The only exception was TNFα, for which the level (relative to the control period) was significantly higher with supernatants from the washout period compared with the treatment period, indicating that something in the supernatant from washout period induced an inflammatory response. A different effect was observed in the adult study, where there was a significant increase in IL-6 and a significant decrease in TNFα after LPS stimulation with supernatants from the washout versus the treatment period. The increase in IL-6 and decrease in TNFα may indicate a delayed and continued anti-inflammatory effect after discontinuing SCF; however, this is difficult to explain as the SCFA levels declined during the washout period. IL-6 has several anti-inflammatory properties as it plays a role in resolving inflammation by promoting neutrophil clearance [32] and positively affects intestinal epithelial cell regeneration after injury [33]. There was an increase in TNFα (relative to supernatants from the control period) after LPS stimulation with supernatants from both the treatment and washout periods of the elderly M-SHIME® study and the increase was significantly higher with supernatants from the washout period versus from the treatment period. It is possible that something in the M-SHIME® supernatants induced this inflammatory response.
A study of SCF in healthy elderly participants (aged 60–80 years) reported that serum concentrations of IL-6 were decreased and that Parabacteroides, a member of the Bacteroidetes phylum, and Ruminococcaceae, a member of the Firmicutes phylum, were increased in the feces after three weeks of SCF supplementation [14]. In the present study, in vitro assays did not demonstrate a reduction of IL-6 after LPS stimulation when cells were exposed to SCF-treated supernatants from the elderly M-SHIME®. In fact, we observed an increase in TNFα with supernatants from the treatment, and to a greater extent, the washout period, versus the control period. It is possible that the effects of SCF are different in an in vitro assay system versus in vivo, or that this is a limitation of the fact that a single donor was used in our study, while the in vivo study included 40 participants. An increase in Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Bifidobacteria with SCF treatment was observed in our elderly M-SHIME® model.
This study had several limitations. First, the findings obtained using an in vitro model cannot be directly translated to biological responses; therefore, SCF should be further evaluated in vivo to determine whether the findings obtained in vitro translate to a biological effect. However, we do note that the SHIME® model has undergone several validation studies. The fermentation profiles of pectin, xylan, arabinogalactan, and starch were confirmed to be consistent between the SHIME® model and incubations with fecal microbiota from human volunteers. Additionally, bacterial metabolic phenotypes were confirmed to be preserved [34] and, using the M-SHIME® model, it was confirmed that interindividual differences among human volunteers as well as unique microbial patterns for individuals were preserved in vitro [35]. Second, our study was conducted using the fecal microbiota of one to four donors per age group, thus limiting the generalizability of our findings, as donor-to-donor differences were observed in the experiments where two or more donors were tested. Finally, the baby, adult, and elderly M-SHIME® studies were conducted somewhat differently, making direct comparisons of the results of the different age groups inappropriate.
Conclusion
Although this study had some limitations, it is the first in vitro investigation into the effects of SCF on the baby gut microbiota. Importantly, it provides support for further studies to determine whether the prebiotic effects observed using the M-SHIME® model will translate to beneficial biological effects in vivo. The findings using the adult M-SHIME® model add to the evidence of the prebiotic effect of SCF in the adult population and provide additional insight into the changes in the microbial community activity that occur with SCF treatment. As with the adult M-SHIME® studies, the effects of SCF on the elderly population reported herein expand upon previous findings and support additional studies of the prebiotic effects of SCF in this population.
Data Availability
Data available upon request.
References
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium Structure (2012) Function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11234
Jandhyala SM, Talukdar R, Subramanyam C et al (2015) Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J Gastroenterol 21:8787–8803. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8787
Walsh CJ, Guinane CM, O’Toole PW et al (2014) Beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota. FEBS Lett 588:4120–4130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.03.035
De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M et al (2010) Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and Rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:14691–14696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005963107
Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME et al (2017) Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:491. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75
Martinez TM, Meyer RK, Duca FA (2021) Therapeutic potential of various plant-based fibers to improve energy homeostasis via the gut microbiota. Nutrients 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103470
Boler BM, Serao MC, Bauer LL et al (2011) Digestive physiological outcomes related to polydextrose and soluble maize fibre consumption by healthy adult men. Br J Nutr 106:1864–1871. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511002388
O’Callaghan A, van Sinderen D (2016) Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front Microbiol 7:925. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00925
Housez B, Cazaubiel M, Vergara C et al (2012) Evaluation of digestive tolerance of a soluble corn fibre. J Hum Nutr Diet 25:488–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2012.01252
Timm DA, Thomas W, Boileau TW et al (2013) Polydextrose and soluble corn fiber increase five-day fecal wet weight in healthy men and women. J Nutr 143:473–478. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.170118
Kendall CW, Esfahani A, Hoffman AJ et al (2008) Effect of novel maize-based dietary fibers on postprandial glycemia and insulinemia. J Am Coll Nutr 27:711–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2008.10719748
Whisner CM, Martin BR, Nakatsu CH et al (2016) Soluble corn fiber increases calcium absorption associated with shifts in the gut microbiome: a randomized dose-response trial in free-living pubertal females. J Nutr 146:1298–1306. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.227256
Jakeman SA, Henry CN, Martin BR et al (2016) Soluble corn fiber increases bone calcium retention in postmenopausal women in a dose-dependent manner: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr 104:837–843. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.132761
Costabile A, Bergillos-Meca T, Rasinkangas P et al (2017) Effects of soluble corn fiber alone or in synbiotic combination with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and the pilus-deficient derivative GG-PB12 on fecal microbiota, metabolism, and markers of immune function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy elderly (Saimes study). Front Immunol 8:1443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01443
Zheng L, Kelly CJ, Battista KD et al (2017) Microbial-derived butyrate promotes epithelial barrier function through IL-10 receptor-dependent repression of Claudin-2. J Immunol 199:2976–2984. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700105
Costabile A, Deaville ER, Morales AM et al (2016) Prebiotic potential of a maize-based soluble fibre and impact of dose on the human gut microbiota. PLoS ONE 11:e0144457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144457
Kolida S, Gibson GR (2007) Prebiotic capacity of inulin-type fructans. J Nutr 137:2503S-2506S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.11.2503S
Fukuda S, Toh H, Hase K et al (2011) Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature 469:543–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09646
Louis P, Flint HJ (2017) Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol 19:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13589
Krieg NR, Staley JT, Brown DR et al (2012) Bergey’s manual of systemic bacteriology, vol 4, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Macy JM, Ljungdahl LG, Gottschalk G (1978) Pathway of succinate and propionate formation in bacteroides fragilis. J Bacteriol 134:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.134.1.84-91.1978
Parada Venegas D, De la Fuente MK, Landskron G et al (2019) Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol 10:277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277
Donohoe DR, Garge N, Zhang X et al (2011) The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metabol 13:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.018
McNabney SM, Henagan TM (2017) Short chain fatty acids in the colon and peripheral tissues: a focus on butyrate, colon cancer, obesity and insulin resistance. Nutrients 9:1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9121348
Hosseini E, Grootaert C, Verstraete W et al (2011) Propionate as a health-promoting microbial metabolite in the human gut. Nutr Rev 69:245–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00388
Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Nachbar RT et al (2011) Regulation of inflammation by short chain fatty acids. Nutrients 3:858–876. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3100858
Chambers ES, Viardot A, Psichas A et al (2015) Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut 64:1744–1754. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307913
Bartolomaeus H, Balogh A, Yakoub M et al (2019) Short-chain fatty acid propionate protects from hypertensive cardiovascular damage. Circulation 139:1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036652
Jacobson A, Lam L, Rajendram M et al (2018) A gut commensal-produced metabolite mediates colonization resistance to salmonella infection. Cell Host Microbe 24:296–307.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.07.002
Van Hul M, Karnik K, Canene-Adams K et al (2020) Comparison of the effects of soluble corn fiber and fructooligosaccharides on metabolism, inflammation, and gut microbiome of high-fat diet-fed mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 319:E779–E791. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00108.2020
Yan G, Xing H, Lui Q et al (2020) Effects of soluble corn fiber on microbial diversity in cecum of piglets. J Nanjing Agric Univ 43:505–513. https://doi.org/10.7685/jnau.201906060
Fielding CA, McLoughlin RM, McLeod L et al (2008) IL-6 regulates neutrophil trafficking during acute inflammation via STAT3. J Immunol 181:2189–2195. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.2189
Kuhn KA, Manieri NA, Liu TC et al (2014) IL-6 stimulates intestinal epithelial proliferation and repair after injury. PLoS ONE 9:e114195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114195
Possemiers S, Bolca S, Grootaert C et al (2006) The prenylflavonoid isoxanthohumol from hops (Humulus lupulus L.) is activated into the potent phytoestrogen 8-Prenylnaringenin in vitro and in the human intestine. J Nutr 136:1862–1867. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.1862
Van den Abbeele P, Belzer C, Goossens M et al (2013) Butyrate-producing clostridium cluster XIVa Species specifically colonize mucins in an in vitro gut model. ISME J 7:949–961. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.158
Funding
This research and the APC was funded by Tate & Lyle PLC, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M., K.K., C.R., and M.C.A.; methodology, M.M., K.K., C.R., and M.C.A.; formal analysis, M.C.A., C.R., M.M., K.K., and I.L.; investigation, M.M. and C.R.; data curation, M.M. and C.R.; writing original draft preparation, M.C.A.; writing, review and editing, C.R., M.M., I.L., D.R., and K.K.; visualization, M.C.A., C.R., and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Fecal samples were collected according to the ethical approval of the University Hospital Ghent (reference number B670201836585).
Consent to Participate
Informed consent of donors or their legal representatives was obtained.
Consent for Publication
All authors consent for publication.
Conflict of Interest
Authors are employees of ProDigest (M.C.A., C.R., and M.M.) or Tate & Lyle PLC (I.L., D.R., and K.K.) as indicated by our affiliations. This work was funded by Tate & Lyle, London, UK which specializes in fibers and low-calorie sweetening ingredients used by food and drink producers worldwide. ProDigest is a company based in Ghent, Belgium which specializes in offering in vitro services to food and functional food companies. The funders were involved in the design of the study; in the interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 1.70 MB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Arroyo, M.C., Laurie, I., Rotsaert, C. et al. Age-Dependent Prebiotic Effects of Soluble Corn Fiber in M-SHIME® Gut Microbial Ecosystems. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 78, 213–220 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-023-01043-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-023-01043-z