Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational Stratification of Hispanics, Whites, and Blacks in Southern Rural Destinations: A Quantitative Analysis

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s, many rural communities in the Southern US have experienced an unprecedented influx of Latino migrants. Some research undertaken on such “new Hispanic destinations” suggests that the newcomers tend to assume low-status jobs shunned by non-Hispanic residents and thus form a segmented labor market, but other work indicates that they heavily compete with natives (particularly African Americans) for less-skilled positions. Drawing on data from the 2000 census and 2009–2011 American Community Survey, this paper examines patterns of occupational stratification between Latino, white, and black men in the rural South to identify whether Hispanic economic relations in the area are better characterized by segmentation or competition. Specifically, occupational dissimilarity indexes and status scores are calculated to map the groups’ relative economic positions in the rural portions of five Southeastern states home to fast-growing nonmetro Latino populations: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Consistent with the segmentation hypothesis, the results reveal that Latinos are highly occupationally dissimilar from non-Hispanic whites and blacks and rank significantly below both in mean occupational status. Standardization of the stratification measures shows that Hispanics’ labor market isolation and disadvantage can be substantially accounted for by their lower average levels of human capital and US citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms “Latino” and “Hispanic” are used interchangeably throughout this paper to refer to individuals of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, or other Spanish language origin.

  2. The Longitudinal Tract Database (LTDB) was employed in the calculations. Drawing on data from multiple censuses, the LTDB provides tract-level estimates of population characteristics at the turn of each decade from 1970 to 2010. Importantly, the tracts are defined uniformly across time, based on the official 2010 boundaries (Logan et al. forthcoming). With regard to the tabulation of the new destination parameters, in both 1990 and 2010 only tracts lying within nonmetro counties as delineated in the 2010 census were classified as nonmetro. Thus, change in Hispanic population size was measured using consistently-defined geographic areas.

  3. Although descriptive statistics on nativity (a key indicator of both human capital and legal status) are provided, nativity-based standardizations are not performed in consideration of the small numbers of US-born Hispanics in the study areas.

  4. Additional analysis shows that Hispanics employed in agriculture are of especially low occupational standing. In 2009–2011, the mean HWSEI of Latinos in this sector varied between 17.1 (GA) and 20.0 (SC), while the average status of their co-ethnics in all other sectors ranged from 25.9 (AR) to 27.5 (GA).

References

  • Baker, D. (2010, July 14). The path of unemployment in the great recession. Center for Economic and Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&-columns/op-eds-&-columns/the-path-of-unemployment-in-the-great-recession.

  • Bohon, S. A. (2005). Occupational attainment of Latino immigrants in the United States. Geographical Review, 95, 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. R. (2006). Evolved sex differences and occupational segregation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. V., & Heckman, J. J. (1993). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catanzarite, L. (2000). Brown-collar jobs: Occupational segregation and earnings of recent-immigrant Latinos. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, J. (2010). The formation of a Hispanic enclave in Nashville, Tennessee. Southeastern Geographer, 50, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, M., Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2006). Beyond gateway cities: Economic restructuring and poverty among Mexican immigrant families and children. Family Relations, 55, 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K. M., & Bankston, C. L. (2008). The origins of employer demand for immigrants in a new destination: The salience of soft skills in a volatile economy. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 124–148). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K. M., Tolbert, C., Nucci, A., & Kawano, Y. (2008). Changing faces, changing places: The emergence of new nonmetropolitan immigrant gateways. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 75–98). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. J., Aragones, A. M., & Shivers, G. (2005). Recent Mexican migration in the rural Delmarva Peninsula: Human rights versus citizenship rights in a local context. In V. Zuniga & R. Hernandez-Leon (Eds.), New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States (pp. 155–183). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faiola, A. (2007, October 15). States’ immigrant policies diverge. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/14/AR2007101401266.html.

  • Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, M. A. (1999). Immigrants, migration, and worker turnover at the Hog Pride pork packing plant. Human Organization, 58, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. C. (2005). Rural industry and Mexican immigration and settlement in North Carolina. In V. Zuniga & R. Hernandez-Leon (Eds.), New destinations: Mexican Immigration in the United States (pp. 50–75). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. (2008). New Midwesterners, new Southerners: Immigration experiences in four rural American settings. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 151–178). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M., & Warren, J. R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update, and critique. Sociological Methodology, 27, 177–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isidore, C. (2010, September 20). Recession officially ended in June 2009. CNN. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/20/news/economy/recession_over/index.htm.

  • Johnson, K. (2010). PUMAS by metro size and Hispanic PUMA type [data file]. Retrieved April 23, 2012.

  • Johnson-Webb, K. D. (2002). Employer recruitment and Hispanic labor migration: North Carolina urban areas at the end of the Millennium. The Professional Geographer, 54, 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, W. (2006). Meat-processing firms attract Hispanic workers to rural America. Amber Waves, 4, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, W., & Cromartie, J. (2004). New patterns of Hispanic settlement in rural America. Rural Development Research Report, 99, i-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, W., & Parrado, E. A. (2005). Restructuring of the US meat processing industry and new Hispanic migrant destinations. Population and Development Review, 31, 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koball, H., Capps, R., Kandel, W., Henderson, J., & Henderson, E. (2008). Social and economic integration of Latino immigrants in new rural destinations. Mathematica Issue Brief, 2, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritz, M. M., Gurak, D. T., & Lee, M. (2011). Will they stay? Foreign-born outmigration from new U.S. destinations. Population Research and Policy Review, 30, 537–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, E., & Odem, M. E. (2009). Popular attitudes and public policies: Southern responses to Latino immigration. In M. E. Odem & E. Lacy (Eds.), Latino immigrants and the transformation of the U.S. South (pp. 143–163). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., Taquino, M. C., & Grice, S. M. (2010). Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: Cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared. Social Science Research, 39, 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippard, C. D. (2011). Racialized hiring practices for ‘dirty’ jobs. In C. D. Lippard & C. A. Gallagher (Eds.), Being brown in Dixie: Race, ethnicity, and Latino immigration in the New South (pp. 201–234). Boulder, CO: FirstForumPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Xu, Z., & Stultz, B. (forthcoming). Interpolating US decennial census tract data from as early as 1970 to 2010: A longitudinal tract database. Professional Geographer.

  • Marrow, H. B. (2011). New destination dreaming: Immigration, race, and legal status in the rural American South. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Capoferro, C. (2008). The geographic diversification of American immigration. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 25–50). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, J., & Casanova, V. (2003). Pines in the lines: Tree planting, H2B guest workers, and rural poverty in Alabama. Southern Rural Sociology, 19, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miech, R. A., Eaton, W., & Liang, K. (2003). Occupational stratification over the life course: A comparison of occupational trajectories across race and gender during the 1980s and 1990s. Work and Occupations, 30, 440–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2013). 2013 report on state immigration laws (Jan.–June). Washington, DC.

  • Newman, C. (2003). Impacts of Hispanic population growth on rural wages. Agricultural Economic Report, 826, i–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odem, M. E., & Lacy, E. (2009). Introduction. In M. E. Odem & E. Lacy (Eds.), Latino immigrants and the transformation of the U.S. South (pp. ix–xxvii). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovadia, S. (2003). The dimensions of racial inequality: Occupational and residential segregation across metropolitan areas in the United States. City and Community, 2, 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, E. A., & Kandel, W. (2008). New Hispanic migrant destinations: A tale of two industries. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 99–123). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor and industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., & Chacko, E. (2009). The mixed embeddedness of ethnic entrepreneurs in a new immigrant gateway. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 7, 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., & Miranda, M. (2005). The sociopolitical dynamics of Mexican immigration in Lexington, Kentucky, 1997–2002: An ambivalent community responds. In V. Zuniga & R. Hernandez-Leon (Eds.), New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States (pp. 187–219). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, J., & Easterbrook, M. (2006, February 28). Rural areas adapt to immigrants. The News & Observer.

  • Ruggles, J., Alexander, T., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Schroeder, M. B., & Sobek, M. (2010). Integrated public use microdata series: version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semyonov, M., Haberfeld, Y., Cohen, Y., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (2000). Racial composition and occupational segregation and inequality across American cities. Social Science Research, 29, 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, B. J. (2008). Inside the gilded cage: The lives of Latino immigrant males in rural central Kentucky. Southeastern Geographer, 48, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutika, D. L. (2005). Bridging the community: Nativism, activism, and the politics of inclusion in a Mexican settlement in Pennsylvania. In V. Zuniga & R. Hernandez-Leon (Eds.), New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States (pp. 103–132). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. E., & Winders, J. (2008). ‘We’re here to stay’: Economic restructuring, Latino migration, and place-making in the US South. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Nonini, S. (2003). Back to ‘the jungle’: Processing migrants in North Carolina meatpacking plants. Anthropology of Work Review, 24, 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, K., & Bohon, S. A. (2006). Educational attainment in new and established Latino metropolitan destinations. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 1225–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuesse, A. C. (2009). Race, migration, and labor control: Neoliberal challenges to organizing Mississippi’s poultry workers. In M. E. Odem & E. Lacy (Eds.), Latino immigrants and the transformation of the U.S. South (pp. 91–111). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surro, R., & Singer, A. (2002). Latino growth in metropolitan America: Changing patterns, new locations. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarns, R. L. (2006, October 3). A racial rift that isn’t black and white. The New York Times.

  • US Department of Labor. (2013). State labor laws. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/whd/state/state.htm.

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsborough, H. H. (1973). A note on the decomposition of indexes of dissimilarity. Working Paper 73-34. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard N. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, R.N. Occupational Stratification of Hispanics, Whites, and Blacks in Southern Rural Destinations: A Quantitative Analysis. Popul Res Policy Rev 33, 717–746 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9324-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9324-y

Keywords

Navigation