Abstract
The Markov models widely used in hydrology are not adequate for drought analysis because they are independent of previous processes in dealing with associated significant autocorrelations of hydrological events. Therefore, use of semi-Markov model becomes more realistic for studying droughts processes due to dynamics of the system. An embedded Markov-based model was developed to assess chances of occurrence of hydrological droughts in which waiting times of the series were defined explicitly. This presents a more global parametric method to define drought duration compared to those frequently used. This model was applied to monthly streamflow series of Apalachicola River, Chattahoochee River and Flint River in Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint (ACF) River Basin, located in southeastern USA. The streamflow conditions below the mean resulting to Near Drought and Critical Drought conditions were considered crucial. Drought occurrence probabilities and corresponding flows indicate a 42 % chance of Near Drought condition and 18 % chance of Critical Drought condition, with transition time of about 1.8 months. The model results were validated using last ten-year data series. Correlation coefficient (r) and root-mean-square error statistics demonstrate that the model can predict Near Drought and Critical Drought conditions with high accuracy, resulting in errors less than 5 % statistical significance. The method is capable of preserving longer memory persistence of historic flow trends in the ACF River Basin, and gives an effective recursive equation of defining occurrence of droughts. The semi-Markov model developed in this work will provide valuable lead in estimating similar drought indices in other related river systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Araghinejad S (2010) An approach for probabilistic hydrological drought forecasting. Water Resour Manag 25:191–200
Biamah EK, Sterk G, Sharma TC (2005) Analysis of agricultural drought in Iiuni, Eastern Kenya: application of a Markov model. Hydrol Process 19:1307–1322
Biria HA, Neshaei MAL, Ghabraei A, Mehrdad MA (2015) Investigation of sediment transport pattern and beach morphology in the vicinity of submerged groyne (case study: Dahane Sar Sefidrood). Front Struct. Civ Eng 9(1):82–90
Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Rossi G (2003) An analytical formulation of return period of drought severity. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17:157–174
Bras RL (1990) Hydrology: an introduction to hydrologic science. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Cancelliere A, Salas J (2004) Drought length properties in periodic-stochastic hydrologic data. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2002WR001750
Cancelliere A, Salas JD (2010) Drought probabilities and return period for annual streamflows series. J Hydrol 391:77–89
Cancelliere A, Bonaccorso B, Rossi G, Salas J (2003) On the probabilistic characterization of drought events. 23rd AGU hydrology days, Fort Collins, CO, April 2003
Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Science, New York
Chung C, Salas JD (2000) Drought occurrence probabilities and risk of dependent hydrologic processes. J Hydrol Eng 5:259–268
Clark II C, Nnaji GA, Huang W (2014) Effects of El-Niño and La-Niña sea surface temperature anomalies on annual precipitations and streamflow discharges in Southeastern United States. J Coast Res: Clim Change Impacts Surf Water Syst Special Issue 68:113–120. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/SI68-015.1
Congressional Research Service (2008) http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RL34326.pdf. Accessed 2012
Douglas EM, Vogel RM, Kroll CN (2002) Impact of streamflow persistence on hydrologic design. J Hydrol Eng 7:220–227
Dracup JA, Lee KS, Paulson EG Jr (1980) On the definition of droughts. Water Resour Res 16:297–302. doi:10.1029/WR016i002p00297
Edossa DC, Babel MS, Gupta AD (2009) Drought analysis in the Awash River Basin, Ethiopia. Water Resour Manag 24:1441–1460
Fernandez B, Salas JD (1999) Return period and risk of hydrologic events. I: mathematical formulation. J Hydrol Eng 4:97–307
Gonzalez J, Valdes J (2003) Bivariate drought recurrence analysis using tree ring reconstructions. J Hydrol Eng 8:247–258
Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia, New York
Hisdal H, Tallaksen LM (2003) Estimation of regional meteorological and hydrological drought characteristics: a case study for Denmark. J Hydrol 281:230–247
Hosking JR, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, London
Huang W (2010) Hydrodynamic modeling and ecohydrological analysis of river inflow effects on Apalachicola Bay, Florida, USA. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86:526–534
Kjeldsen TR, Lundorf A, Dan R (2000) Use of two component exponential distribution in partial duration modelling of hydrological droughts in Zimbabwean rivers. J Hydrol Sci 45:285–298
Kuiry SN, Ding Y, Wang SSY (2014) Numerical simulations of morphological changes in barrier islands induced by storm surges and waves using a supercritical flow model. Front Struct Civ Eng 8(1):57–68
Lloyd EH (1970) Return period in the presence of persistence. J Hydrol 10:202–215
Loaiciga HA, Marino M (1991) Recurrence interval of geophysical events. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 117:367–382
Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216
Mishra AK, Singh VP (2011) Drought modeling—a review. J Hydrol 403:157–175
Mishra AK, Singh VP, Desai VR (2007) Drought characterization: a probabilistic approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:41–55
Moreland JA (1993) U.S. geological survey open file report 93-642. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1993/ofr93-642/. Accessed 2012
National Drought Mitigation Center (2006) http://www.drought.unl.edu/. Accessed 2012
Nnaji GA, Huang W, Gitau MW, Clark II C (2014) Frequency analysis of minimum ecological flow and gage height in Suwannee River, Florida. J Coast Res: Clim Change Impacts Surf Water Syst Special Issue 68: 152–159. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/SI68-020.1
Ochola WO, Kerkides P (2003) A Markov chain simulation model for predicting critical wet and dry spells in Kenya: analysing rainfall events in the Kano plains. Irrig Drain 52:327–342
Pacific Disaster Center (2012) http://www.pdc.org/iweb/drought.jsp?subg=1. Accessed 2012
Pandey RP, Mishra SK, Singh R, Ramasastri KS (2008) Streamflow drought severity analysis of Betwa River System (India). Water Resour Manag 22:1127–1141
Paulo AA, Pereira LS (2007) Prediction of SPI drought class transitions using Markov chains. Water Resour Manag 21:1813–1827
Paulo AA, Pereira LS, Matias PG (2001) Analyses of local and regional droughts in southern Portugal. In: Proceedings workshop on drought mitigation for the near east and the Mediterranean, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria
Paulo AA, Ferreira E, Coelho C, Pereira LS (2005) Drought class transition analysis through Markov and Loglinear models, an approach to early warning. Agric Water Manag 77:59–81
Salas J, Fu C, Cancelliere A, Dustin D, Bode D, Pineda A, Vincent E (2005) Characterizing the severity and risk of droughts of the Poudre River, Colorado. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 131:383–393
Schwager SJ (1983) Run probabilities in sequences of Markov-dependent trials. J Am Stat As 78:168–175
Sen Z (1980) Statistical analysis of hydrologic critical droughts. J Hydraul Div ASCE 106:99–115
Serinaldi F, Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Grimaldi S (2008) Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas. Phys Chem Earth 34:596–605
Shiau J, Shen HW (2001) Recurrence analysis of hydrologic droughts of differing severity. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 127:30–40
Sobey RJ (2005) Extreme low and high water levels. Coast Eng 52:63–77
Tsakiris G, Pangalou D, Vangelis H (2007) Regional drought assessment based on the reconnaissance drought index (RDI). Water Resour Manag 21:821–833. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9105-4
United States Geographical Survey (2012) http://www.usgs.gov/. Accessed 2012
Van Lanen HAJ, Tallaksen LM, Kasparek L, Querner EP (1997) Hydrological drought analysis in the Hupsel basin using different physically-based models. In Regional hydrology: concepts and models for sustainable water resource management (Proceedings of the Postojna, Slovenia, conference, September–October 1997). IAHS Publ. no. 246
Vogel RM (1987) Reliability indices for water supply systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 113:563–579
Wilber DH (1992) Association between freshwater inflows and oyster productivity in Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 35:179–190
Wu H, Soh L-K, Samal A, Chen X-H (2008) Trend analysis of streamflow drought events in Nebraska. Water Resour Manag 22:145–164. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9148-6
Xie Y, Lv X, Liu R, Mao L, Liu X (2015) Research on port ecological suitability evaluation index system and evaluation model. Front Struct Civ Eng 9(1):65–70
Xu S, Huang W (2008) Frequency analysis for predicting 1 % annual maximum water levels in Florida coast. Hydrol Process 22:4507–4518
Xu S, Huang W (2011) Estimating extreme water levels with long-term data by GEV distribution at Wusong station near Shanghai city in Yangtze Estuary. Ocean Eng 38:468–478
Yevjevich V (1967) An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. Hydrology paper 23, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, for the financial support provided during the course of this research. Dr. Gideon Nnaji is grateful to Dr. Omar Thomas for his advice. Dr. Clark also thanks El Elyon for guidance in this endeavor. This study was also partially supported by FAMU Foundation scholarship, and School of Graduate Studies and Research of Florida A&M University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nnaji, G.A., Clark, C.J., Chan-Hilton, A.B. et al. Drought prediction in Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin using a semi-Markov model. Nat Hazards 82, 267–297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2201-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2201-8