Skip to main content
Log in

Drought prediction in Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin using a semi-Markov model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Markov models widely used in hydrology are not adequate for drought analysis because they are independent of previous processes in dealing with associated significant autocorrelations of hydrological events. Therefore, use of semi-Markov model becomes more realistic for studying droughts processes due to dynamics of the system. An embedded Markov-based model was developed to assess chances of occurrence of hydrological droughts in which waiting times of the series were defined explicitly. This presents a more global parametric method to define drought duration compared to those frequently used. This model was applied to monthly streamflow series of Apalachicola River, Chattahoochee River and Flint River in Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint (ACF) River Basin, located in southeastern USA. The streamflow conditions below the mean resulting to Near Drought and Critical Drought conditions were considered crucial. Drought occurrence probabilities and corresponding flows indicate a 42 % chance of Near Drought condition and 18 % chance of Critical Drought condition, with transition time of about 1.8 months. The model results were validated using last ten-year data series. Correlation coefficient (r) and root-mean-square error statistics demonstrate that the model can predict Near Drought and Critical Drought conditions with high accuracy, resulting in errors less than 5 % statistical significance. The method is capable of preserving longer memory persistence of historic flow trends in the ACF River Basin, and gives an effective recursive equation of defining occurrence of droughts. The semi-Markov model developed in this work will provide valuable lead in estimating similar drought indices in other related river systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araghinejad S (2010) An approach for probabilistic hydrological drought forecasting. Water Resour Manag 25:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biamah EK, Sterk G, Sharma TC (2005) Analysis of agricultural drought in Iiuni, Eastern Kenya: application of a Markov model. Hydrol Process 19:1307–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biria HA, Neshaei MAL, Ghabraei A, Mehrdad MA (2015) Investigation of sediment transport pattern and beach morphology in the vicinity of submerged groyne (case study: Dahane Sar Sefidrood). Front Struct. Civ Eng 9(1):82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Rossi G (2003) An analytical formulation of return period of drought severity. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17:157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras RL (1990) Hydrology: an introduction to hydrologic science. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere A, Salas J (2004) Drought length properties in periodic-stochastic hydrologic data. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2002WR001750

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere A, Salas JD (2010) Drought probabilities and return period for annual streamflows series. J Hydrol 391:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere A, Bonaccorso B, Rossi G, Salas J (2003) On the probabilistic characterization of drought events. 23rd AGU hydrology days, Fort Collins, CO, April 2003

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung C, Salas JD (2000) Drought occurrence probabilities and risk of dependent hydrologic processes. J Hydrol Eng 5:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark II C, Nnaji GA, Huang W (2014) Effects of El-Niño and La-Niña sea surface temperature anomalies on annual precipitations and streamflow discharges in Southeastern United States. J Coast Res: Clim Change Impacts Surf Water Syst Special Issue 68:113–120. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/SI68-015.1

  • Congressional Research Service (2008) http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RL34326.pdf. Accessed 2012

  • Douglas EM, Vogel RM, Kroll CN (2002) Impact of streamflow persistence on hydrologic design. J Hydrol Eng 7:220–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dracup JA, Lee KS, Paulson EG Jr (1980) On the definition of droughts. Water Resour Res 16:297–302. doi:10.1029/WR016i002p00297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edossa DC, Babel MS, Gupta AD (2009) Drought analysis in the Awash River Basin, Ethiopia. Water Resour Manag 24:1441–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez B, Salas JD (1999) Return period and risk of hydrologic events. I: mathematical formulation. J Hydrol Eng 4:97–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez J, Valdes J (2003) Bivariate drought recurrence analysis using tree ring reconstructions. J Hydrol Eng 8:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal H, Tallaksen LM (2003) Estimation of regional meteorological and hydrological drought characteristics: a case study for Denmark. J Hydrol 281:230–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JR, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W (2010) Hydrodynamic modeling and ecohydrological analysis of river inflow effects on Apalachicola Bay, Florida, USA. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86:526–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen TR, Lundorf A, Dan R (2000) Use of two component exponential distribution in partial duration modelling of hydrological droughts in Zimbabwean rivers. J Hydrol Sci 45:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiry SN, Ding Y, Wang SSY (2014) Numerical simulations of morphological changes in barrier islands induced by storm surges and waves using a supercritical flow model. Front Struct Civ Eng 8(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd EH (1970) Return period in the presence of persistence. J Hydrol 10:202–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loaiciga HA, Marino M (1991) Recurrence interval of geophysical events. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 117:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2011) Drought modeling—a review. J Hydrol 403:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP, Desai VR (2007) Drought characterization: a probabilistic approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland JA (1993) U.S. geological survey open file report 93-642. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1993/ofr93-642/. Accessed 2012

  • National Drought Mitigation Center (2006) http://www.drought.unl.edu/. Accessed 2012

  • Nnaji GA, Huang W, Gitau MW, Clark II C (2014) Frequency analysis of minimum ecological flow and gage height in Suwannee River, Florida. J Coast Res: Clim Change Impacts Surf Water Syst Special Issue 68: 152–159. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/SI68-020.1

  • Ochola WO, Kerkides P (2003) A Markov chain simulation model for predicting critical wet and dry spells in Kenya: analysing rainfall events in the Kano plains. Irrig Drain 52:327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Disaster Center (2012) http://www.pdc.org/iweb/drought.jsp?subg=1. Accessed 2012

  • Pandey RP, Mishra SK, Singh R, Ramasastri KS (2008) Streamflow drought severity analysis of Betwa River System (India). Water Resour Manag 22:1127–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulo AA, Pereira LS (2007) Prediction of SPI drought class transitions using Markov chains. Water Resour Manag 21:1813–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulo AA, Pereira LS, Matias PG (2001) Analyses of local and regional droughts in southern Portugal. In: Proceedings workshop on drought mitigation for the near east and the Mediterranean, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria

  • Paulo AA, Ferreira E, Coelho C, Pereira LS (2005) Drought class transition analysis through Markov and Loglinear models, an approach to early warning. Agric Water Manag 77:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas J, Fu C, Cancelliere A, Dustin D, Bode D, Pineda A, Vincent E (2005) Characterizing the severity and risk of droughts of the Poudre River, Colorado. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 131:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwager SJ (1983) Run probabilities in sequences of Markov-dependent trials. J Am Stat As 78:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z (1980) Statistical analysis of hydrologic critical droughts. J Hydraul Div ASCE 106:99–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Serinaldi F, Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Grimaldi S (2008) Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas. Phys Chem Earth 34:596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau J, Shen HW (2001) Recurrence analysis of hydrologic droughts of differing severity. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 127:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobey RJ (2005) Extreme low and high water levels. Coast Eng 52:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Pangalou D, Vangelis H (2007) Regional drought assessment based on the reconnaissance drought index (RDI). Water Resour Manag 21:821–833. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9105-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Geographical Survey (2012) http://www.usgs.gov/. Accessed 2012

  • Van Lanen HAJ, Tallaksen LM, Kasparek L, Querner EP (1997) Hydrological drought analysis in the Hupsel basin using different physically-based models. In Regional hydrology: concepts and models for sustainable water resource management (Proceedings of the Postojna, Slovenia, conference, September–October 1997). IAHS Publ. no. 246

  • Vogel RM (1987) Reliability indices for water supply systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 113:563–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber DH (1992) Association between freshwater inflows and oyster productivity in Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 35:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Soh L-K, Samal A, Chen X-H (2008) Trend analysis of streamflow drought events in Nebraska. Water Resour Manag 22:145–164. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9148-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Lv X, Liu R, Mao L, Liu X (2015) Research on port ecological suitability evaluation index system and evaluation model. Front Struct Civ Eng 9(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Huang W (2008) Frequency analysis for predicting 1 % annual maximum water levels in Florida coast. Hydrol Process 22:4507–4518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Huang W (2011) Estimating extreme water levels with long-term data by GEV distribution at Wusong station near Shanghai city in Yangtze Estuary. Ocean Eng 38:468–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yevjevich V (1967) An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. Hydrology paper 23, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, for the financial support provided during the course of this research. Dr. Gideon Nnaji is grateful to Dr. Omar Thomas for his advice. Dr. Clark also thanks El Elyon for guidance in this endeavor. This study was also partially supported by FAMU Foundation scholarship, and School of Graduate Studies and Research of Florida A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clayton J. Clark II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nnaji, G.A., Clark, C.J., Chan-Hilton, A.B. et al. Drought prediction in Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin using a semi-Markov model. Nat Hazards 82, 267–297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2201-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2201-8

Keywords

Navigation