Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical, neuroimaging and histopathological features of gliomatosis cerebri: a systematic review based on synthesis of published individual patient data

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is a rare fatal widespread infiltrating CNS tumor. As consistent disease features have not been established, the tumor comprises a diagnostic challenge.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search for published case reports and case series on patients with histologically confirmed GC. Clinical, diagnostic, neuroimaging, histopathological, and molecular data on individual or summary patient level were extracted and analyzed.

Results

A total of 274 studies were identified, including 866 patients with individual-level data and 782 patients with summary data (58.9% males, mean age 43.6 years). Seizures (49.8%) were the most common presenting symptom followed by headache (35.9%), cognitive decline (32.2%), and focal motor deficits (32%). Imaging studies showed bilateral hemisphere involvement in 65%, infratentorial infiltration in 29.9% and a focal contrast-enhanced mass (type II GC) in 31.1% of cases. MRI (extensive hyperintensities in T2/FLAIR sequences) and MR spectroscopy (elevated choline, creatinine, and myoinositol levels; decreased NAA levels) showed highly consistent findings across GC patients. Low-grade and anaplastic astrocytoma were the most prevalent diagnostic categories, albeit features of any histology (astrocytic, oligodendroglial, oligoastrocytic) and grade (II–IV) were also reported. Among molecular aberrations, IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation were the most commonly reported. Increasing time elapsed from symptom onset to diagnosis comprised the only independent determinant of the extent of CNS infiltration.

Conclusion

A distinct clinical, neuroimaging, histopathological, or molecular GC phenotype is not supported by current evidence. MRI and MR spectroscopy are important tools for the diagnosis of the tumor before confirmation with biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ranjan S, Warren KE (2017) Gliomatosis cerebri: current understanding and controversies. Front Oncol 7:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenfield JP, Castaneda Heredia A, George E, Kieran MW, Morales La Madrid A (2016) Gliomatosis cerebri: a consensus summary report from the First International Gliomatosis cerebri Group Meeting. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63:2072–2077. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herrlinger U (2012) Gliomatosis cerebri. Handb Clin Neurol 105:507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53502-3.00005-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu A, Li K, Li H (2006) Value of diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MRI and MR spectroscopy in gliomatosis cerebri. Eur J Radiol 59:216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruda R, Bertero L, Sanson M (2014) Gliomatosis cerebri: a review. Curr Treat Options Neurol 16:273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-013-0273-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgakis MK, Spinos D, Pourtsidis A, Psyrri A, Panourias IG, Sgouros S, Petridou ET (2018) Incidence and survival of gliomatosis cerebri: a population-based cancer registration study. J Neurooncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2802-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2007) World Health Organization histological classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  8. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Broniscer A, Chamdine O, Hwang S, Lin T, Pounds S, Onar-Thomas A, Shurtleff S, Allen S, Gajjar A, Northcott P, Orr BA (2016) Gliomatosis cerebri in children shares molecular characteristics with other pediatric gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 131:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1532-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrlinger U, Jones DTW, Glas M, Hattingen E, Gramatzki D, Stuplich M, Felsberg J, Bahr O, Gielen GH, Simon M, Wiewrodt D, Schabet M, Hovestadt V, Capper D, Steinbach JP, von Deimling A, Lichter P, Pfister SM, Weller M, Reifenberger G (2016) Gliomatosis cerebri: no evidence for a separate brain tumor entity. Acta Neuropathol 131:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1495-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll KT, Hirshman B, Ali MA, Alattar AA, Brandel MG, Lochte B, Lanman T, Carter B, Chen CC (2017) Management and survival patterns of patients with gliomatosis cerebri: a SEER-based analysis. World Neurosurg 103:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Glas M, Bahr O, Felsberg J, Rasch K, Wiewrodt D, Schabet M, Simon M, Urbach H, Steinbach JP, Rieger J, Fimmers R, Bamberg M, Nagele T, Reifenberger G, Weller M, Herrlinger U, Neuro-Oncology Group of the German Cancer S (2011) NOA-05 phase 2 trial of procarbazine and lomustine therapy in gliomatosis cerebri. Ann Neurol 70:445–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Skerman HM, Yates PM, Battistutta D (2012) Identification of cancer-related symptom clusters: an empirical comparison of exploratory factor analysis methods. J Pain Symptom Manage 44:10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Almutary H, Douglas C, Bonner A (2016) Multidimensional symptom clusters: an exploratory factor analysis in advanced chronic kidney disease. J Adv Nurs 72:2389–2400. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanwella R, de Silva VA (2011) Signs and symptoms of acute mania: a factor analysis. BMC Psychiatry 11:137. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bourne TD, Schiff D (2010) Update on molecular findings, management and outcome in low-grade gliomas. Nat Rev Neurol 6:695–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2010.159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boots-Sprenger SH, Sijben A, Rijntjes J, Tops BB, Idema AJ, Rivera AL, Bleeker FE, Gijtenbeek AM, Diefes K, Heathcock L, Aldape KD, Jeuken JW, Wesseling P (2013) Significance of complete 1p/19q co-deletion, IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas: use with caution. Mod Pathol 26:922–929. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Masui K, Cloughesy TF, Mischel PS (2012) Review: molecular pathology in adult high-grade gliomas: from molecular diagnostics to target therapies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 38:271–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01238.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Guzman-de-Villoria JA, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Munoz L, Reig S, Benito C, Garcia-Barreno P, Desco M (2007) 1H MR spectroscopy in the assessment of gliomatosis cerebri. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:710–714. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bendszus M, Warmuth-Metz M, Klein R, Burger R, Schichor C, Tonn JC, Solymosi L (2000) MR spectroscopy in gliomatosis cerebri. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:375–380

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Georgakis MK, Karalexi MA, Kalogirou EI, Ryzhov A, Zborovskaya A, Dimitrova N, Eser S, Antunes L, Sekerija M, Zagar T, Bastos J, Agius D, Florea M, Coza D, Bouka E, Bourgioti C, Dana H, Hatzipantelis E, Moschovi M, Papadopoulos S, Sfakianos G, Papakonstantinou E, Polychronopoulou S, Sgouros S, Stefanaki K, Stiakaki E, Strantzia K, Zountsas B, Pourtsidis A, Patsouris E, Petridou ET (2017) Incidence, time trends and survival patterns of childhood pilocytic astrocytomas in Southern-Eastern Europe and SEER, US. J Neurooncol 131:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2284-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taillibert S, Chodkiewicz C, Laigle-Donadey F, Napolitano M, Cartalat-Carel S, Sanson M (2006) Gliomatosis cerebri: a review of 296 cases from the ANOCEF database and the literature. J Neurooncol 76:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-005-5263-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimony N, Shofty B, Ram Z, Grossman R (2017) Perioperative risk assessment of patients with gliomatosis cerebri. World Neurosurg 98:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen S, Tanaka S, Giannini C, Morris J, Yan ES, Buckner J, Lachance DH, Parney IF (2013) Gliomatosis cerebri: clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes. J Neurooncol 112:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1058-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaloshi G, Guillevin R, Martin-Duverneuil N, Laigle-Donadey F, Psimaras D, Marie Y, Mokhtari K, Hoang-Xuan K, Delattre JY, Sanson M (2009) Gray matter involvement predicts chemosensitivity and prognosis in gliomatosis cerebri. Neurology 73:445–449. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b163e2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim K, Chie EK, Park HJ, Kim DG, Jung HW, Park SH, Kim IH (2014) Exclusive radiotherapy for gliomatosis cerebri: long-term follow-up at a single institution. Clin Transl Oncol 16:829–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-013-1156-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marios K. Georgakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No author has anything to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 327 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Georgakis, M.K., Tsivgoulis, G., Spinos, D. et al. Clinical, neuroimaging and histopathological features of gliomatosis cerebri: a systematic review based on synthesis of published individual patient data. J Neurooncol 140, 467–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2976-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2976-4

Keywords

Navigation