Skip to main content
Log in

The good, the ‘not good’, and the ‘not pretty’: negation in the negative predicates of Tlingit

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops and defends a semantic/syntactic analysis of a curious set of negative gradable predicates in the Tlingit language, and shows that the analysis has some important consequences concerning the range of crosslinguistic variation in degree constructions. In Tlingit, certain negative gradable predicates are formed by negating a positive root and then applying an additional morphological operation: e.g. k’éi ‘good’, tlél ukʼé ‘not good’, tlél ushké ‘bad’. I show that (i) the negation in forms like tlél ushké ‘bad’ is VP-external, clausal negation, and is not an incorporated negation like English un-; and (ii) the meaning of these forms is indeed that of a gradable negative predicate, rather than the propositional negation of the positive predicate (cf. tlél ukʼé ‘not good’). Under the proposed analysis, the additional morphological operation observed in these forms is the reflex of a special degree relativizer, one that must undergo movement to Spec-NegP. In addition, Tlingit differs from English and other languages in that degree operators—like POS and comparative operators—can be attached high in the clause, above sentential negation. In addition to capturing various facts concerning these negative predicates, the proposed analysis raises some novel puzzles concerning intervention effects in the movement of degree operators, and provides support for the view that negative predicates like bad are morphosyntactically derived from positive predicates like good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2015. Epistemic indefinites: An overview. In Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, ed. Luis Alonso-Ovalle and Paula Menéndez-Benito, 1–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alrenga, Peter, and Christopher Kennedy. 2014. No more shall we part: Quantifiers in English comparatives. Natural Language Semantics 22: 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglini, Rebekah. 2015. Stative predication and semantic ontology: A cross-linguistic study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for LF-movement. Natural Language Semantics 4: 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Sigrid. 2012. DegP scope revisited. Natural Language Semantics 20: 227–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth. 2013. Decomposing notions of adjectival transitivity in Navajo. Natural Language Semantics 21 (3): 277–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel. 2007a. Cross-polar nomalies. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. T. Friedman and M. Gibson, 37–52. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel. 2007b. More or less. In Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 43, No. 2, 3–17. Chicago: CLS.

  • Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M.J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1987. Classics of Tlingit oral literature, Volume 1: Haa Shuká, Our ancestors: Tlingit oral narratives. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, Karen, and Guido Wyngaerd. 2017. Why Affixal Negation is Syntactic. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. A. Kaplan, A. Kaplan, M. McCarvel, E. Rubin, 151–158. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Eggleston, Keri. 2013. 575 Tlingit verbs: A study of Tlingit verb paradigms. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Alaska Fairbanks.

  • Francez, Itamar, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2017. Semantics and morphosyntactic variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from Building 20, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 2001. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, ed. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 2006. Little. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 16, ed. Masayuki Gibson and Jonathan Howell, 35–58. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 2008. Decomposing antonyms? In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, ed. Atle Grønn, 212–225. Oslo: ILOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kari, James. 1992. Some concepts in Ahtna Athabaskan word formation. In Morphology now, ed. Mark Aronoff, 107–132. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 2009. Modes of comparison. In Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 43, No. 1, 141–165. Chicago: CLS.

  • Kennedy, Christopher, and Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of Change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, ed. Louise McNalley and Christopher Kennedy, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, and Itamar Francez. 2010. Possessed properties in Ulwa. Natural Language Semantics 18: 197–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, Paul. 2014. External negation in Malay/Indonesian. Language 90 (1): 137–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leer, Jeff. 1991. The schetic categories of the Tlingit verb. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Leer, Jeff, James Kari, and Ben Potter. 2010. The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska 5). Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70 (4): 369–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morzycki, Marcin. 2011. Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Natural Language Semantics 19 (1): 39–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rett, Jessica. 2015. The semantics of evaluativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, Maribel. 2016. POS, -est, and reverse readings of many and most. In Proceedings of NELS 46, ed. Christopher Hammerly and Brandon Prickett, 141–154. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Schwarzschild, Roger, and Karina Wilkinson. 2002. Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell, X̱ʼunei Lance. 2018. Haa Dachx̱ánx'i Sáani Kagéiyi Yís: Haa Yoo X̱ʼatángi Kei Naltseen (For Our Little Grandchildren: Language Revitalization Among the Tlingit). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaiʼi at Hilo.

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 2009. The temporal degree adjectives früh(er)/spät(er) ‘early(er)’/‘late(r)’ and the semantics of the positive. In Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, ed. Anastasia Giannakidou and Monika Rathert, 214–233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth Cable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cable, S. The good, the ‘not good’, and the ‘not pretty’: negation in the negative predicates of Tlingit. Nat Lang Semantics 26, 281–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-018-9147-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-018-9147-1

Keywords

Navigation