Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers an analysis of metalinguistic comparatives such as more dumb than crazy in which they differ from ordinary comparatives in the scale on which they compare: ordinary comparatives use scales lexically determined by particular adjectives, but metalinguistic ones use a generally-available scale of imprecision or ‘pragmatic slack’. To implement this idea, I propose a novel compositional implementation of the Lasersohnian pragmatic-halos account of imprecision—one that represents clusters of similar meanings as Hamblin alternatives. In the theory that results, existential closure over alternatives mediates between alternative-sets and meanings in which imprecision has been resolved. I then articulate a version of this theory in which the alternatives are not related meanings but rather related utterances, departing significantly from Lasersohn’s original conception. Although such a theory of imprecision is more clearly ‘metalinguistic’, the evidence for it from metalinguistic comparatives in English is surprisingly limited. The overall picture that emerges is one in which the grammatical distinction between ordinary and metalinguistic comparatives tracks the independently motivated distinction between vagueness and imprecision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT.

  • Agafonova, Irina. 2010. Topics in coordination. PhD diss., Michigan State University.

  • Alonso-Ovalle, Luis. 2006. Disjunction in alternative semantics. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Elena Guerzoni. 2004. Double negation, negative concord and metalinguistic negation. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 38.1, Main Session), ed. Mary Andronis et al., Chicago: Chicago Lingiustic Society. 15–31.

  • Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Paula, Menéndez-Benito. 2004. Some epistemic indefinites. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 34, ed. Makoto Kadowaki and Shigeto Kawahara, 1–12. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Beck Sigrid, Toshiko Oda, Koji Sugisaki. (2004) Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 289–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt Rajesh, Roumyana Pancheva. (2004) Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan Joan. (1973) Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring Daniel. (1997) The meaning of topic and focus - the 59th street bridge accent. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carston Robyn. (1996) Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Chierchia Gennaro. (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia Gennaro. (2004) Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In: Adriana Belletti (eds) Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 39–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert. 1990. The syntax of left branch extractions. PhD diss., Tilburg University.

  • Cresswell Max J. (1976) The semantics of degree. In: Barbara H, Barbara H (eds) Montague grammar. Academic Press, New York, pp 261–292

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSciullo Anna Maria, Edwin Williams. (1987) On the definition of word. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick David. (2007) Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine Kit. (1975) Vagueness, truth, and logic. Synthése 30: 265–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Melita Stavrou. 2008. On MCs and negation in Greek. In Workshop on Greek syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Giannakidou Anastasia, Suwon Yoon. (2009) MCs in Greek and Korean: Attitude semantics, expressive content, and negative polarity items. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13: 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. To appear. The subjective mode of comparison: MCs in Greek and Korean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Extended projection. Ms., Brandeis University.

  • Hamblin Charles L. (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Heim Irene. (2000) Degree operators and scope. In: Brendan Jackson, Tanya Matthews (eds) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 10. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY, pp 40–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn Laurence R. (1985) Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn Laurence R. (1992) The said and the unsaid. In: Chris Barker, David Dowty (eds) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 2. The Ohio State University, Columbus, pp 163–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston Rodney, Geoffrey K. Pullum. (2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp Hans. (1975) Two theories about adjectives. In: Edward L., Edward L. (eds) Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 123–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Formal methods in the study of language, part 1, ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, Vol. 135, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts, reprinted in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof (ed), 1984, Truth, interpretation, and information; Selected papers from the third Amsterdam colloquium, 1–41. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Kamp Hans, Barbara Partee. (1995) Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57: 121–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne Richard S. (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan Edward L., Leonard M., Leonard M. (1985) Boolean semantics for natural language. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. PhD diss., UC Santa Cruz, published in 1999 by Garland, New York.

  • Kennedy Christopher. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy Christopher, Beth Levin. (2008) Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In: Christopher Kennedy., Louise McNally. (eds) Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 156–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy Christopher, Louise McNally. (2005) Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshet Ezra. (2006) Scalar implicatures with alternative semantics. In: Gibson M., Howell J. (eds) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 16. CLC Publications, Ithaca, NY, pp 88–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein Ewan. (1980) A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika, and Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. Paper presented at the 3rd Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics.

  • Lasersohn Peter. (1992) Generalized conjunction and temporal modification. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 381–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn Peter. (1999) Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, Winfried. 2007. Comments on ‘Metalinguistic contrast in the grammar of Greek’. Handout, workshop on Greek syntax and semantics, MIT, commentary on Giannakidou and Stavrou (2008).

  • Matushansky Ora. (2002) Tipping the scales: The syntax of scalarity in the complement of seem. Syntax 5: 219–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCawley James D. (1968) The role of semantics in a grammar. In: Emmon Bach, Robert Harms. (eds) Universals in linguistic theory. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 124–169

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley James D. (1998) The syntactic phenomena of English, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1973. Comparative constructions in English: A syntactic and semantic analysis. PhD diss., University of Rochester.

  • Menéndez-Benito, Paula. 2005. The grammar of choice. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Morzycki Marcin. (2009) Degree modification of gradable nouns: Size adjectives and adnominal degree morphemes. Natural Language Semantics 17: 175–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2004a. Domains of measurement: Formal properties of non-split/split quantifier constructions. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.

  • Nakanishi Kimiko. (2004) On comparative quantification in the verbal domain. In: Kazuha Watanabe., Robert B. Young. (eds) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14. CLC Publications, Ithaca NY, pp 179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman Ad, Hansvan de Koot, Jenny Doetjes. (2004) Degree expressions. The Linguistic Review 21: 1–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee Barbara. (1987) Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh, Martin Stokhof (eds) Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara, and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, ed. Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, ed. 2002, Formal semantics: The essential reading, 361–393. Malden: Blackwell.

  • Pinkal, Manfred. 1995. Logic and the Lexicon: The semantics of the indefinite, Vol. 56 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. (Trans. by Geoffrey Simmons. Originally published in 1985 as Logik und Lexikon.)

  • Potts, Christopher. 2003. The logic of conventional implicatures. PhD diss., UC Santa Cruz, published in 2005 by Oxford University Press.

  • Potts Christopher. (2007) The dimensions of quotation. In: Chris Barker, Polly Jacobson. (eds) Proceedings from the workshop on direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 405–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Rooth Mats. (1996) Focus. In: Shalom Lappin. (eds) The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 271–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotstein Carmen, Yoad Winter. (2001) Partial adjectives vs. total adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modification. Natural language semantics 12: 259–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of Wh-constructions. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Sauerland Uli, Penka Stateva. (2007) Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: Evidence from approximators. In: Masayuki Gibson, Tova Friedman. (eds) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 17. CLC Publications, Ithaca NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada Osamu. (2007) Pragmatic properties of the Japanese scalar reversal adverbs. Talk, midwest workshop on semantics

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild Roger. (2008) The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuren Pieter A.M. (1973) The comparative. In: Ferenc Kiefer, Nicolas Ruwet. (eds) Generative grammar in Europe. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 528–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimoyama Junko. (2006) Indeterminate phrase quantification in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 14: 139–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalta, Elisabeth. 2007. Context dependence in the interpretation of questions and subjunctives. PhD diss., University of Tübingen.

  • von Stechow Arnim. (1984) Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson Timothy. (1994) Vagueness. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter Yoad. (1996) A unified semantic treatment of singular NP coordination. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 337–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter Yoad. (2005) Cross-categorial restrictions on measure phrase modification. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 233–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and Languages, Michigan State University, A-614 Wells Hall, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Marcin Morzycki

Authors
  1. Marcin Morzycki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Morzycki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morzycki, M. Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Nat Lang Semantics 19, 39–86 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9063-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9063-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation