Abstract
Two studies tested the role of guilt instrumentality in motivating the regulation of collective guilt up or down by motivated reasoning, and its dependence on mental resources. In Study 1 participants (N = 93) were randomly assigned to learn that guilt is beneficial, detrimental or neither. Consistent with the instrumental approach to emotion regulation, learning that guilt is beneficial led to higher levels of collective guilt following an ingroup transgression compared to the other conditions. In Study 2 (N = 178), we tested the hypothesis that regulation of collective guilt involves motivated reasoning and is cognitively demanding. Consistent with predictions derived from cognitive energetics theory, the effect of guilt instrumentality on collective guilt replicated when mental resources were not constrained, but was not observed under cognitive load. The findings suggest that individuals may be motivated to increase or reduce collective guilt depending at least partly on its instrumentality, and are willing to invest mental resources in such regulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The correlation between political orientation and collective guilt was − 0.52 (p < 0.001). Preliminary analyses indicated that political orientation did not interact with the experimental manipulation.
When the covariate is excluded from the analysis, the effect of the manipulation does not reach significance but trends in the same direction F(2,90) = 1.82, p = 0.166, \(\eta _{p}^{2}\) = 0.039, 90% CI [0.832, 0.050].
The correlation between political orientation and collective guilt was − 0.49 (p < .001). Preliminary analyses indicated that political orientation did not interact with the other independent variables.
When the covariate is excluded from the analyses, the main effect of guilt instrumentality and the interaction with cognitive load remain significant. Guilt instrumentality effect: F(2,171) = 5.66, p = 0.004, \(\eta _{p}^{2}\) = 0.062, 90% CI [0.01, 0.12]; guilt instrumentality × cognitive load interaction: F(2,171) = 9.301, p < 0.001, \(\eta _{p}^{2}\) = 0.098, 90% CI [0.03, 0.17]. The main effect of cognitive load, which was not hypothesized, is not significant, F(1,171) = 1.11, p = 0.294, \(\eta _{p}^{2}\) = 0.006, 90% CI [0.00, 0.04].
References
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303.
Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (2004a). Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2004b). International perspectives on the experience of collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Branscombe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 336–356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., & Čehajić, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.
Brown, R., González, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Čehajić, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75.
Castano, E. (2008). On the perils of glorifying the in-group: Intergroup violence, in-group glorification, and moral disengagement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00040.x.
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Effron, D. A., Halperin, E., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. D. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023936.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206064637.
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509.
Gilbert, D. T., & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.940.
Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. New York: Psychology Press.
Goldenberg, A., Saguy, T., & Halperin, E. (2014). How group-based emotions are shaped by collective emotions: Evidence for emotional transfer and emotional burden. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037462.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198.
Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd edn., pp. 3–20). New York: The Guilford Press.
Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish Society. Journal of Peace Research, 48(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311412642.
Halperin, E., Pliskin, R., Saguy, T., Liberman, V., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation and the cultivation of political tolerance: Searching for a new track for intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(6), 1110–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713492636.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202238377.
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., Chen, X., Köpetz, C., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.
Leach, C. W., Zeineddine, F. B., & Čehajić-Clancy, S. (2013). Moral immemorial: The rarity of self-criticism for previous generations’ genocide or mass violence. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12002.
Lickel, B., Steele, R. R., & Schmader, T. (2011). Group-based shame and guilt: Emerging directions in research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(3), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00340.x.
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602.
Maoz, I., & McCauley, C. (2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707308597.
Mari, S., Andrighetto, L., Gabbiadini, A., Durante, F., & Volpato, C. (2010). The shadow of the Italian colonial experience: The impact of collective emotions on intentions to help the victims’ descendants. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(1), 58–74.
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X18974.
Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Biernat, M. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 768–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210370031.
Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206062075.
Packer, D. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307309606.
Parrott, W. G. (1993). Beyond hedonism: Motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. In D. M. Wegner & J. W. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 278–308). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Peetz, J., Gunn, G. R., & Wilson, A. E. (2010). Crimes of the past: Defensive temporal distancing in the face of past in-group wrongdoing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210364850.
Porat, R., Halperin, E., Mannheim, I., & Tamir, M. (2016). Together we cry: Social motives and preferences for group-based sadness together we cry: Social motives and preferences for group-based sadness. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1039495.
Porat, R., Halperin, E., & Tamir, M. (2016). What we want is what we get: Group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000043.
Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698.
Schori-Eyal, N., Tagar, R., Saguy, M., T., & Halperin, E. (2015). The benefits of group-based pride: Pride can motivate guilt in intergroup conflicts among high glorifiers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.008.
Sharvit, K., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A., & Gurevich, R. (2010). Ideological orientation and social context as moderators of the effect of terrorism: The case of Israeli-Jewish public opinion regarding peace. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.613.
Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M., & Colucci, F. P. (2015). To feel or not to feel when my group harms others? The regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1223–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215592843.
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 38, pp. 183–242). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5.
Smith, E. R., Seger, C. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.431.
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., Rothschild, Z. K., & Cronin, T. J. (2013). Self-harm focus leads to greater collective guilt: The case of the U.S.-Iraq conflict. Political Psychology, 34(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12010.
Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01617.x.
Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325.
Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2009). Choosing to be afraid: Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion, 9(4), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015882.
Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2012). When feeling bad is expected to be good: Emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts. Emotion, 12(4), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024443.
Tamir, M., Ford, B. Q., & Gilliam, M. (2013). Evidence for utilitarian motives in emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 27(3), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.715079.
Tamir, M., Mitchell, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychological Science, 19(4), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02088.x.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77–122.
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol 2, pp. 379–398). Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n46.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1093.
Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600574815.
Zebel, S., Zimmermann, A., Viki, G. T., & Doosje, B. (2008). Dehumanization and guilt as distinct but related predictors of support for reparation policies. Political Psychology, 29(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00623.x.
Acknowledgements
The research was funded by German-Israeli Foundation (GIF) for Scientific Research and Development Young Scientist Grant # I-2359-105.4/2014 to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharvit, K., Valetzky, S. Who wants to be collectively guilty? A causal role for motivation in the regulation of collective guilt. Motiv Emot 43, 103–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9718-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9718-y