Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Return to Work for People with Common Mental Disorders: Insights into the Implementation of a Collaborative Program in a Specialized Mental Health Hospital

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Common mental disorders (CMDs) are a major cause of sick leave. Return-to-work (RTW) interventions providing mechanisms that support the participation and collaboration of the different stakeholders appear promising in these circumstances. The Therapeutic Return-to-Work (TRW) Program offers such mechanisms designed to enable affected workers to fully reintegrate into their jobs on a sustainable basis. This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing this program for workers with CMDs, within a specialized mental health hospital. Methods The study was conducted using a multiple case design and three main data sources: (1) the worker’s medical file, (2) the log completed by the clinicians, and (3) individual interviews with stakeholders. Data were analyzed using a qualitative approach. Results Twelve workers between 32 and 60 years old, mostly women with complex mental health profiles working in large enterprises, participated in this study. Three main observations were made regarding the TRW Program implementation: (1) eight cases were characterized by complete or virtually complete implementation; (2) no explanatory factor could be identified for the different implementation levels; (3) eight cases achieved RTW success (RTW to the original job or another job), which appears partially attributable to the high level of program implementation. Conclusions: The TRW Program seems highly promising for supporting the return to work of workers with CMDs. However, studies identifying the factors likely to influence the implementation process in different health service contexts and specifying the scope and nature of the program’s actual impact on RTW outcomes should be conducted before larger-scale implementation takes place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Supporting workplace mental health. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dewa, CS., McDaid, D., Sultan-Taïeb, H. (2011) Epidemiological and economic aspects inherent in mental disorders (Aspects épidémiologiques et économiques inhérents aux troubles mentaux.) In: Corbière, M., Durand, MJ., editors. From mental disorder to incapacity at work: A transdisciplinary perspective that aims to better understand this problem and to offer avenues for intervention (Du Trouble Mental à l’Incapacité au Travail: Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’intervention.), QC: Presses de l’Université du Québec, Québec (PUQ) 5–40

  3. Mental Health Commission of Canada - MHCC. (2017) Reducing employment barriers for people living with a mental illness: Using evidence-based practices to build Canada’s mental health and employment policy framework (Réduction des obstacles à l’emploi pour les personnes ayant un problème de santé mentale: Recours à des pratiques fondées sur des données probantes pour établir le cadre stratégique canadien sur la santé mentale et l’emploi.) MHCC, Ottawa

  4. Sairanen S, Matzanke D, Smeall D. The business case: collaborating to help employees maintain their mental well-being. Healthc Pap. 2011;11:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roelen CAM, Norder G, Koopmans PC, et al. Employees sick-listed with mental disorders: who returns to work and when? J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:409–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaidel CS, Ethiraj RK, Berenji M, Gaspar FW. Health care expenditures and length of disability across medical conditions. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60:631–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. (2017) Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254610. Accessed 1 July 2020.

  9. Borg V, Andersen MN, Kolte IV, Andersen MF. White paper on mental health, sickness absence and return to work. Copenhagen: National Research Centre for the Working Environment; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canada Safety Council. (2018) Mental Health and the Workplace. In: Canada Safety Council. https://canadasafetycouncil.org/mental-health-and-the-workplace. Accessed 25 July 2018

  11. Dewa CS, Chau N, Dermer S. Examining the comparative incidence and costs of physical and mental health-related disabilities in an employed population. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:758–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dewa CS, Chau N, Dermer S. Factors associated with short-term disability episodes. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:1394–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dewa CS, McDaid D, Ettner SL. An International perspective on worker mental health problems: who bears the burden and how are costs addressed? Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52:346–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fossey EM, Harvey CA. Finding and sustaining employment: A qualitative meta-synthesis of mental health consumer views. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77:303–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim D, Sanderson K, Andrews G. Lost productivity among full-time workers with mental disorders. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000;3:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Making the case for investing in mental health in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. OECD. Sick on the Job? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Grazier KL. The Economic Impact of Depression in the Workplace. In: Riba MB, Parikh SV, Greden JF, editors. Mental health in the workplace: strategies and tools to optimize outcomes. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 17–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kinman G. Sickness presenteeism at work: prevalence, costs and management. Br Med Bull. 2019;129:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, et al. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, et al. Cost of lost productive work time among US workers with depression. JAMA. 2003;289:3135–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomonaga Y, Haettenschwiler J, Hatzinger M, et al. The economic burden of depression in Switzerland. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31:237–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim KL, Jacobs P, Ohinmaa A, et al. A new population-based measure of the economic burden of mental illness in Canada. Chronic Dis Can. 2008;28:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin MHT, Nielsen MBD, Petersen SMA, et al. Implementation of a coordinated and tailored return-to-work intervention for employees with mental health problems. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sylvain C, Durand MJ, Sanchez AV, et al. Development and Implementation of a Mental Health Work Rehabilitation Program: Results of a Developmental Evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29:303–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen MBD, Bültmann U, Amby M, et al. Return to work among employees with common mental disorders: Study design and baseline findings from a mixed-method follow-up study. Scand J Soc Med. 2010;38:864–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wisenthal A, Krupa T, Kirshm BH, Lysaght R. Cognitive work hardening for return to work following depression: An intervention study. Can J Occup Ther. 2018;85:21–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld SE, Houtman ILD. Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work Stress. 2006;20:129–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin MHT, Nielsen MBD, Madsen IEH, et al. Effectiveness of a coordinated and tailored return-to-work intervention for sickness absence beneficiaries with mental health problems. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:621–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thisted CN, Nielsen CV, Bjerrum M. Work participation among employees with common mental disorders: a meta-synthesis. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):452–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dewa CS, Trojanowski L, Joosen MCW, Bonato S. Employer best practice guidelines for the return to work of workers on mental disorder-related disability leave: a systematic review. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr. 2016;61:176–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 2001;9:351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Durand, MJ., Loisel, P., Charpentier, N. et al. The Therapeutic Return to Work (RTT) program. An evidence-based occupational rehabilitation program (Le programme de Retour Thérapeutique au Travail (RTT). Un programme de réadaptation au travail basé sur les données probantes.) Boucherville: PREVICAP occupational rehabilitation clinical research center (Centre de recherche clinique en réadaptation au travail PRÉVICAP); 2004.

  36. Loisel P, Anema J, editors. Handbook of Work Disability: Prevention and Management. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013.

  37. Durand, MJ., Briand, C. (2011) Return-to-work interventions/programs for workers with transient mental disorders (Interventions/programmes de retour au travail destinés aux travailleurs ayant un trouble mental transitoire). In: Corbière M, Durand M-J, (eds) From mental disorder to work disability: A transdisciplinary perspective which aims to better understand this problem and to offer avenues for intervention (Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail: Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’interventions). Presses de l’Université du Québec (PUQ), Québec (pp. 199-224)

  38. Durand MJ, Loisel P. Therapeutic Return to Work: Rehabilitation in the workplace. Work Read Mass. 2001;17:57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Durand MJ, Loisel P. (2001) The transformation of occupational rehabilitation from a compartmentalized perspective to a systemic perspective (La transformation de la réadaptation au travail d’une perspective parcellaire à une perspective systémique). Interdisciplinary perspectives on work and health (Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé) [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.3799.

  40. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Loisel P, Berthelette D. Constructing the program impact theory for an evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work Read Mass. 2003;21:233–42.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Loisel P, Imbeau D. Validation of the programme impact theory for a work rehabilitation programme. Work Read Mass. 2012;42:495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, et al. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:807–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, et al. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine. 1997;22:2911–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbière M. Work and mental health: learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30:444–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pineault, R., Daveluy, C. (1995) Health planning: concepts, methods, strategies (La planification de la santé: concepts, méthodes, stratégies). Editions Nouvelles p. 480

  46. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:452–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Durand, MJ., Corbière, M., Briand, C. et al. (2011) Factors related to prolonged absences from work due to a transient mental disorder: development of a measurement tool (Les facteurs reliés aux absences prolongées du travail en raison d’un trouble mental transitoire: développement d’un outil de mesure). Montreal: Robert-Sauvé Research Institute in Occupational Health and Safety (Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail)

  49. Durand MJ, Coutu MF, Berbiche D. Validation of the work disability diagnosis interview for musculoskeletal and mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31:232–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. American Psychiatric Association. (2022) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Association

  51. Patton, MQ. (2015) Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Study. In: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (pp. 652‑743)

  52. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis (Analyse des données qualitatives). Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vézina, M., Cloutier, E., Stock, SR. et al. (2011) Quebec survey on working and employment conditions and occupational health and safety (Enquête québécoise sur des conditions de travail, d’emploi et de santé et de sécurité du travail (EQCOTESST). Quebec, QC: Robert-Sauvé Research Institute in Occupational Health and Safety (Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail), Quebec National Institute of Public Health (Institut national de santé publique du Québec), Quebec Institute of Statistics (Institut de la statistique du Québec)

  54. Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the context and implementation of complex interventions (CICI) framework. Implement Sci. 2017;12:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69:123–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Joosen MC, Lugtenberg M, Arends I, et al. Barriers and facilitators for return to work from the perspective of workers with common mental disorders with short, medium and long-term sickness absence: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32:272–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. de Vries G, Schene AH. Reintegration to Work of People Suffering from Depression. In: Söderback I, editor. International handbook of occupational therapy interventions. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 375–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Mikkelsen MB, Rosholm M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at enhancing return to work for sick-listed workers with common mental disorders, stress-related disorders, somatoform disorders and personality disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75:675–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dol M, Varatharajan S, Neiterman E, et al. Systematic review of the impact on return to work of return-to-work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31:675–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Parsons V, Juszczyk D, Gilworth GA, et al. case management occupational health model to facilitate earlier return to work of NHS staff with common mental health disorders: a feasibility study. Health Technol Assess. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Mayne J. Useful theory of change models. Can J Program Eval. 2015;30:119–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Brousselle A, Buregeya JM. Theory-based evaluations: Framing the existence of a new theory in evaluation and the rise of the 5th generation. Evaluation. 2018;24:153–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lemire ST, Nielsen SB, Dybdal L. Making contribution analysis work: a practical framework for handling influencing factors and alternative explanations. Evaluation. 2012;18:294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf. 2004;22:63–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the contribution of all the occupational health professionals, as well as the workers’, employers’ and insurers’ representatives who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the Research Chair in Occupational Rehabilitation (JA Bombardier/Pratt & Whitney Canada).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-José Durand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durand, MJ., Sylvain, C. & Paquette, MA. Return to Work for People with Common Mental Disorders: Insights into the Implementation of a Collaborative Program in a Specialized Mental Health Hospital. J Occup Rehabil 33, 362–374 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10079-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10079-y

Keywords

Navigation