Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of a Coordinated and Tailored Return-to-Work Intervention for Sickness Absence Beneficiaries with Mental Health Problems

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Sickness absence and exclusion from the labour market due to mental health problems (MHPs) is a growing concern in many countries. Knowledge about effective return-to-work (RTW) intervention models is still limited, but a multidisciplinary, coordinated and tailored approach has shown promising results in the context of musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of this approach as implemented among sickness absence beneficiaries with MHPs. Methods In a quasi-randomised, controlled trial, we assessed the intervention’s effect in terms of time to RTW and labour market status after 1 year. We used two different analytical strategies to compare time to RTW between participants receiving the intervention (n = 88) and those receiving conventional case management (n = 80): (1) a traditional multivariable regression analysis controlling for measured confounding, and (2) an instrumental variable (IV) analysis controlling for unmeasured confounding. Results The two analytical approaches provided similar results in terms of a longer time to RTW among recipients of the intervention (HR = 0.50; 95 % CI 0.34–0.75), although the estimate provided by the IV-analysis was non-significant (HR = 0.70; 95 % CI 0.23–2.12). After 1 year, more recipients of the intervention than of conventional case management were receiving sickness absence benefits (p = 0.031). Conclusion The intervention delayed RTW compared to conventional case management, after accounting for measured confounding. The delayed RTW may be due to either implementation or program failure, or both. It may also reflect the complexity of retaining employees with mental health problems in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Klink JJL, Blonk RWB, Schene AH, van Dijk FJH. Reducing long term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomised controlled design. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:429–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouwers EPM, Tiemens BG, Terluin B, Verhaak PFM. Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sickness absence in patients with emotional distress or minor mental disorders: a randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Vente W, Kamphuis JH, Ernmelkamp PMG, Blonk RWB. Individual and group cognitive-behavioral treatment for work-related stress complaints and sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13:214–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willert MV, Thulstrup AM, Bonde JP. Effects of a stress management intervention on absenteeism and return to work—results from a randomized wait-list controlled trial. Scand J Work Env Health. 2011;37:186–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Oostrom SH, van Mechelen W, Terluin B, de Vet HC, Knol DL, Anema JR. A workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress: results of a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67:596–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleten N, Johnsen R. Reducing sick leave by minimal postal intervention: a randomised, controlled intervention study. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:676–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Netterstrøm B, Bech P. Effect of a multidisciplinary stress treatment programme on the return to work rate for persons with work-related stress. A non-randomized controlled study from a stress clinic. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Søgaard HJ, Bech P. The effect on length of sickness absence by recognition of undetected psychiatric disorder in long-term sickness absence. A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37:864–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bültmann U, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Verhoeven AC, Verbeek JH, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. Interventions to improve occupational health in depressed people. Cochr Database System Rev. 2008;2:CD006237.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borg V, Nexø M, Kolte I, Andersen M. Hvidbog om mentalt helbred, sygefravær og tilbagevenden til arbejde [White paper on mental health, sickness absence and return to work] [Danish]. Copenhagen: The National Research Centre for the Working Environment; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bültmann U, Sherson D, Olsen J, Hansen CL, Lund T, Kilsgaard J. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:81–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonell CP, Hargreaves J, Cousens S, Ross D, Hayes R, Petticrew M, et al. Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65:582–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Earle CC, Tsai JS, Gelber RD, Weinstein MC, Neumann PJ, Weeks JC. Effectiveness of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer in the elderly: instrumental variable and propensity analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1064–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martens EP, Pestman WR, de Boer A, Belitser SV, Klungel OH. Instrumental variables application and limitations. Epidemiology. 2006;17:260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Diallo B, Vachon B, Charpentier N, Labelle J. From evidence to community practice in work rehabilitation: the Quebec experience. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:105–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen MBD, Bultmann U, Madsen IEH, Martin MHT, Christensen U, Diderichsen F, et al. Health, work, and personal-related predictors of time to return to work among employees with mental health problems. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernan MA, Robins JM. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist’s dream? Epidemiology. 2006;17:360–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. JASA. 1996;91:444–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cousens S, Hargreaves J, Bonell C, Armstrong B, Thomas J, Kirkwood BR, et al. Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public-health interventions: statistical analysis and causal inference. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65:576–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cole JA, Norman H, Weatherby LB, Walker AM. Drug copayment and adherence in chronic heart failure: effect on cost and outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:1157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brookhart MA, Rassen JA, Schneeweiss S. Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19:537–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin MHT, Nielsen MBD, Petersen SMA, Jakobsen LM, Rugulies R. Implementation of a coordinated and tailored return-to-work intervention for employees with mental health problems. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sekjær, K. Stadigt flere psykisk syge må vente på behandling [Increasing number of mentally ill must wait for treatment] [Danish]. Available from: http://www.information.dk/259442.

  27. Pedersen J, Villadsen E, Burr H, Martin MHT, Nielsen MBD, Meinertz L. Register for sygedagpenge og sociale ydelser i Danmark [The Danish register of sickness absence compensation and social transfer payments] [Danish]. Copenhagen: The National Research Centre for the Working Environment; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen MBD, Madsen IEH, Bültmann U, Christensen U, Diderichsen F, Rugulies R. Predictors of return to work in employees sick-listed with mental health problems: findings from a longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21:806–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sell L, Bültmann U, Rugulies R, Villadsen E, Faber A, Sogaard K. Predicting long-term sickness absence and early retirement pension from self-reported work ability. Int Arch Occ Env Health. 2009;82:1133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Virtanen M, Kawachi I, Oksanen T, Salo P, Tuisku K, Pulkki-Raback L, et al. Socio-economic differences in long-term psychiatric work disability: prospective cohort study of onset, recovery and recurrence. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:791–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Blank L, Peters J, Pickvance S, Wilford J, MacDonald E. A systematic review of the factors which predict return to work for people suffering episodes of poor mental health. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rose D, Harrison E. The European socio-economic classification: a new social class schema for comparative European research. Eur Societies. 2007;9:459–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W. The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Dis. 2001;66:159–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R. Administration, scoring and procedures. MANUAL-II. Townson MD, 1983.

  36. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41:327–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rebergen DS, Bruinvels DJ, Bos CM, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W. Return to work and occupational physicians’ management of common mental health problems–process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:488–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aust B, Helverskov T, Nielsen MB, Bjorner JB, Rugulies R, Nielsen K, et al. The Danish national return-to-work program–aims, content, and design of the process and effect evaluation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:120–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Loisel P, Durand P, Abenhaim L, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, et al. Management of occupational back pain—the Sherbrooke model—results of a pilot and feasibility study. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51:597–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyograph Kinesiol. 2004;14:13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Romanov K, Appelberg K, Honkasalo ML, Koskenvuo M. Recent interpersonal conflict at work and psychiatric morbidity: a prospective study of 15,530 employees aged 24–64. J Psychosom Res. 1996;40:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health: a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Env Health. 2006;32:443–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Netterstrøm B, Conrad N, Bech P, Fink P, Olsen O, Rugulies R, et al. The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:118–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hensing G, Wahlstrom R. Chapter 7. Sickness absence and psychiatric disorders. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32:152–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schademan HK, Jensen S, Thuesen F, Holt H. Virksomhedernes sociale engagement [Corporate social responsibility] [Danish]. Copenhagen: SFI—The Danish National Centre for Social Research; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Høgelund J, Holm A, McIntosh J. Does graded return-to-work improve sick-listed workers’ chance of returning to regular working hours? J Health Econ. 2010;29:158–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by grants from the Danish Prevention Fund (Forebyggelsesfonden, grant #07-2-2-020) and the Danish Working Environment Research Fund (Arbejdsmiljøforskningsfonden, grant #31-2008-09). The study was approved and registered by the Danish Data Protection Agency (Registration number: 2008-54-0438).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Marie H. T. Martin, Maj Britt D. Nielsen, Ida E. H. Madsen, Signe M. A. Petersen & Reiner Rugulies

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Marie H. T. Martin & Reiner Rugulies

  3. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Reiner Rugulies

  4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Theis Lange

Authors
  1. Marie H. T. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maj Britt D. Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ida E. H. Madsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Signe M. A. Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Theis Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Reiner Rugulies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie H. T. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, M.H.T., Nielsen, M.B.D., Madsen, I.E.H. et al. Effectiveness of a Coordinated and Tailored Return-to-Work Intervention for Sickness Absence Beneficiaries with Mental Health Problems. J Occup Rehabil 23, 621–630 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9421-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9421-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation