Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) among Asylum Seekers in New York City

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) affects millions of girls and women globally each year despite widespread criminalization of the practice. Eradication efforts have focused on the health risks associated with FGM/C however, it is important to understand the sociocultural context in which this practice exists. We conducted a cross-sectional study using retrospective chart review and structured interviews with women recruited through the Bellevue/New York University Program for Survivors of Torture. Of the 43 participants enrolled in the study, 88.4% initially indicated there is no benefit of undergoing FGM/C but when prompted, agreed that social acceptance (16.3%), religious approval (11.6%), and better marriage prospects (9.3%) are possible benefits. More sexual pleasure for the women (46.5%), avoiding pain (30.2%), and fewer medical problems (16.3%) were stated as benefits of not undergoing FGM/C. Overall, 40 (93%) participants believed the practice should be discontinued. This study highlights that there may be a perception of social benefit of undergoing FGM/C. Although most participants believed the practice should be discontinued, the complex social milieu within which this practice exists must be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. 2016. https://data.unicef.org/resources/female-genital-mutilationcutting-global-concern/.

  2. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. 2013. https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_69875.html.

  3. World Health Organization. Family and Community Health Cluster. A systematic review of the health complications of female genital mutilation including sequelae in childbirth. 2000. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66355.

  4. World Health Organization. Care of women and girls living with female genital mutilation: a clinical handbook. 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272429/9789241513913-eng.pdf.

  5. Shell-Duncan B, et al. Legislating change? Responses to criminalizing female genital cutting in Senegal. Law Soc Rev. 2013;47(4):803–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Too Many. The law and FGM: an overview of 28 African countries. 2018. https://www.28toomany.org/thematic/law-and-fgm/.

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of reproductive health. Reproductive health in crisis situations. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/global/tools/crisissituations.htm.

  8. The CITI Program. Biomedical research: basic course. https://about.citiprogram.org/en/course/biomedical-biomed-basic/.

  9. Shahawy S, et al. Perspectives on female genital cutting among immigrant women and men in Boston. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:331–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khaja K, et al. Female genital cutting: African women speak out. Int Social Work. 2009;52(6):727–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jirovsky E. Views of women and men in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, on three forms of female genital modification. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(35):84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alo OA, Gbadebo B. Intergenerational attitude changes regarding female genital cutting in Nigeria. J Women’s Health. 2011;20(11):1655–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fried S, et al. Outpatients’ perspectives on problems and needs related to female genital mutilation/cutting: a qualitative study from Somaliland. Obstet Gynecol Intl. 2013;2013:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reig-Alcaraz M, et al. Attitudes towards female genital mutilation: an integrative review. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;61(1):25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Afifi M. Women's empowerment and the intention to continue the practice of female genital cutting in Egypt. Arch Iran Med. 2009;12(2):154–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karmaker B, et al. Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patra S, Singh RK. Attitudes of circumcised women towards discontinuation of genital cutting of their daughters in Kenya. J Biosoc Sci. 2015;47(1):45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berg RC, Denison E. A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(10):837–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. United States Department of State. 2016 Country reports on human rights practices—India. 2017. https://www.refworld.org/docid/58ec8a2613.html

  20. Ahmady K. A comprehensive research study of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) in Iran—2015. 2015. http://kameelahmady.com/prevalence-of-female-genital-mutilationcutting-in-iran/. Accessed Nov 2019

  21. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: what might the future hold? 2014. https://data.unicef.org/resources/female-genital-mutilationcutting-might-future-hold/.

  22. UK Border Agency. Country of origin information service. Female genital mutilation (FGM). 2008. https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/1171171/1504_1224004793_africa-fgm-080708.pdf.

  23. UNICEF. Female genital mutilation prevalence (%)—Maldives. 2017. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.FGMS.ZS?end=2018&locations=MV&start=1960&view=chart.

  24. Hinai HA. Female genital mutilation in the Sultanate of Oman. 2014. https://www.stopfgmmideast.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/habiba-al-hinai-female-genital-mutilation-in-the-sultanate-of-oman1.pdf.

  25. United States Department of State. 2016 Country reports on human rights practices—Pakistan. 2017. https://www.refworld.org/docid/58ec89e9f.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank EMPOWER Lab members Julia Leschi and Gabriel Herrera for their work on data collection for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Martell.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 3 Countries where FGM/C is practiced

3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martell, S., Schoenholz, R., Chen, V.H. et al. Perceptions of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) among Asylum Seekers in New York City. J Immigrant Minority Health 23, 1241–1248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-020-01103-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-020-01103-5

Keywords

Navigation