Abstract
Electrical stimulation is an increasingly popular method to terminate epileptic seizures, yet it is not always successful. A potential reason for inconsistent efficacy is that stimuli are applied empirically without considering the underlying dynamical properties of a given seizure. We use a computational model of seizure dynamics to show that different bursting classes have disparate responses to aborting stimulation. This model was previously validated in a large set of human seizures and led to a description of the Taxonomy of Seizure Dynamics and the dynamotype, which is the clinical analog of the bursting class. In the model, the stimulation is realized as an applied input, which successfully aborts the burst when it forces the system from a bursting state to a quiescent state. This transition requires bistability, which is not present in all bursters. We examine how topological and geometric differences in the bistable state affect the probability of termination as the burster progresses from onset to offset. We find that the most significant determining factors are the burster class (dynamotype) and whether the burster has a DC (baseline) shift. Bursters with a baseline shift are far more likely to be terminated due to the necessary structure of their state space. Furthermore, we observe that the probability of termination varies throughout the burster’s duration, is often dependent on the phase when it was applied, and is highly correlated to dynamotype. Our model provides a method to predict the optimal method of termination for each dynamotype. These results lead to the prediction that optimization of ictal aborting stimulation should account for seizure dynamotype, the presence of a DC shift, and the timing of the stimulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chow, J. H., et al. (1990). Singular Perturbation Analysis of Large-Scale Power-Systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 12(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-0615(90)90007-X
Connors, B. W. (1984). Initiation of Synchronized Neuronal Bursting in Neocortex. Nature, 310(5979), 685–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/310685a0
Crisp, D. N., et al. (2020). Quantifying Epileptogenesis in Rats with Spontaneous and Responsive Brain State Dynamics. Brain Communications, 2(1), fcaa048. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa048
El Houssaini, K., et al. (2020). The Epileptor Model: A Systematic Mathematical Analysis Linked to the Dynamics of Seizures, Refractory Status Epilepticus, and Depolarization Block. eNeuro, 7,(2). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0485-18.2019
Fox, D. M., et al. (2015). Bursting in Neurons and Small Networks (pp. 455–469). Springer.
Golubitsky, M., et al. (1985). Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory. Springer-Verlag. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 51, 69.
Goyal, A., et al. (2023). Synchronized Electrical Cardioversion. Statpearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489237
Guckenheimer, J., & Holmes, P. (1997). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields (1st 1983 ed.). Springer. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42.
Ikeda, A., et al. (1999). Focal ictal direct current shifts in human epilepsy as studied by subdural and scalp recording. Brain, 122( Pt 5), 827–838. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=10355669
Izhikevich, E. M. (2010). Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience. The MIT Press.
Jahangiri, A., & Durand, D. M. (2011). Phase resetting analysis of high potassium epileptiform activity in Ca3 region of the rat hippocampus. International Journal Neural Systems, 21(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065711002705
Jirsa, V. K., et al. (2014). On the Nature of Seizure Dynamics. Brain, 137(Pt 8), 2210–2230. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu133
Jiruska, P., et al. (2013). Synchronization and Desynchronization in Epilepsy: Controversies and Hypotheses. Journal of Physiology, 591(Pt 4), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239590
Johnson, S. W., et al. (1992). Burst Firing in Dopamine Neurons Induced by N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - Role of Electrogenic Sodium-Pump. Science, 258(5082), 665–667. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1329209
Kikani, J., & Pedrosa Jr, O. A. (1991). Perturbation Analysis of Stress-Sensitive Reservoirs (Includes Associated Papers 25281 and 25292 ). Text, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 6. 1991–09–01. https://doi.org/10.2118/20053-PA
Lagarde, S., et al. (2019). The Repertoire of Seizure Onset Patterns in Human Focal Epilepsies: Determinants and Prognostic Values. Epilepsia, 60(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.14604
Lee, S., et al. (2019). Dc Shifts, High Frequency Oscillations, Ripples and Fast Ripples in Relation to the Seizure Onset Zone. Seizure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2019.05.001
Lytton, W. W. (2008). Computer Modelling of Epilepsy. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(8), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2416
Ma, J., et al. (2012). Small-Signal Stability Analysis of Microgrid Based on Perturbation Theory. Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, 2012, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/appeec.2012.6306946. IEEE.
Marder, E., & Taylor, A. L. (2011). Multiple Models to Capture the Variability in Biological Neurons and Networks. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2735
Martinez, I., et al. (2004). Perturbation Analysis of Power Systems: Effects of Second- and Third-Order Nonlinear Terms on System Dynamic Behavior. Electric Power Systems Research, 71(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7796(04)00029-X
Merrill, D. R., et al. (2005). Electrical Stimulation of Excitable Tissue: Design of Efficacious and Safe Protocols. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 141(2), 171–198. S0165–0270(04)00382–6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020
Morrell, M. J. (2011). Responsive Cortical Stimulation for the Treatment of Medically Intractable Partial Epilepsy. Neurology, 77(13), 1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182302056
Neuropace Inc. (2008). Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Epilepsy. Retrieved August 8, 2008, from http://www.neuropace.com/product/overview.html
Perucca, P., et al. (2014). Intracranial Electroencephalographic Seizure-Onset Patterns: Effect of Underlying Pathology. Brain, 137(Pt 1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt299
Proix, T., et al. (2016). How Do Parcellation Size and Short-Range Connectivity Affect Dynamics in Large-Scale Brain Network Models? NeuroImage, 142, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.016
Proix, T., et al. (2018). Predicting the Spatiotemporal Diversity of Seizure Propagation and Termination in Human Focal Epilepsy. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02973-y
Rinzel, J. (1987). A Formal Classification of Bursting Mechanisms in Excitable Systems. Mathematical Topics in Population Biology, Morphogenesis and Neurosciences: Proceedings of an International Symposium Held in Kyoto, November 10–15, 1985 (267–281) edited by Ei Teramoto and Masaya Yumaguti, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93360-8_26
Saggio, M. L., et al. (2017) Fast-Slow Bursters in the Unfolding of a High Codimension Singularity and the Ultra-Slow Transitions of Classes. Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-017-0050-8
Saggio, M. L., et al. (2020). A Taxonomy of Seizure Dynamotypes. Elife, 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55632
Saggio, M. L., & Jirsa, V. (2022). Phenomenological Mesoscopic Models for Seizure Activity. arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.02783. Accessed October 16 2022.
Stacey, W. C., & Litt, B. (2008). Technology Insight: Neuroengineering and Epilepsy-Designing Devices for Seizure Control. Nature Clinical Practice. Neurology, 4(4), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0750
Thompson, S. A., et al. (2016). Ictal Infraslow Activity in Stereoelectroencephalography: Beyond the “Dc Shift.” Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.020
Vanhatalo, S., et al. (2003). Very Slow Eeg Responses Lateralize Temporal Lobe Seizures: An Evaluation of Non-Invasive Dc-Eeg. Neurology, 60(7), 1098–1104.
Wang, H. E., et al. (2023). Delineating Epileptogenic Networks Using Brain Imaging Data and Personalized Modeling in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Science Translational Medicine, 15(680), eabp8982. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abp8982
Wendling, F., et al. (2015). Computational Models of Epileptiform Activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.027
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health R01-NS094399, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA3), and Michigan Medicine (Robbins Family Research Fund and Lucas Family Research Fund).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Action Editor: Steven Schiff
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 21857 KB)
Supplementary file2 (MP4 17642 KB)
Supplementary file3 (MP4 8203 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Szuromi, M.P., Jirsa, V.K. & Stacey, W.C. Optimization of ictal aborting stimulation using the dynamotype taxonomy. J Comput Neurosci 51, 445–462 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-023-00859-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-023-00859-7