Abstract
Participatory approaches to environmental decision making and assessment continue to grow in academic and policy circles. Improving how we understand the structure of deliberative activities is especially important for addressing problems in natural resources, climate change, and food systems that have wicked dimensions, such as deep value disagreements, high degrees of uncertainty, catastrophic risks, and high costs associated with errors. Yet getting the structure right is not the only important task at hand. Indeed, participatory activities can break down and fail to achieve their specific goals when some of the deliberators lack what we will call participatory virtues. We will argue for the importance of future research on how environmental education can incorporate participatory virtues to equip future citizens with the virtues they will need to deliberate about wicked, environmental problems. What is the role of education for deliberative skills and virtues relative to other aspects of environmental education, such as facts and values education? How important is it relative to careful design of the deliberative process? What virtues really matter?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, J., Forest, P.-G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F.-P. (2001). A review of public participation and consultation methods. http://www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/compareparticipation.pdf. Accessed on March 22, 2011.
Aikin, S. F., & Clanton, J. C. (2010). Developing group-deliberative virtues. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 27(4), 409–424.
Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics: Democracy and ecological rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Batie, S. S. (2008). Wicked problems and applied economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(5), 1176–1191.
Brown, J. (1986). The Self. New York: McGraw Hill.
Brown, P. (1997). Popular epidemiology revisited. Current Sociology, 45(3), 137–156. doi:10.1177/001139297045003008.
Brown, V. A. (2010). Conducting an Imaginative Transdisciplinary Inquiry. In V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London; Washington, DC: Earthscan.
Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London; Washington, DC: Earthscan.
Castellanet, C., & Jordan, C. F. (2002). Participatory action research in natural resource management: A critique of the method based on five years’ experience in the Transamazônica Region of Brazil. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Chess, C., & Purcell, K. (1999). Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science and Technology, 33(16), 2685–2692. doi:10.1021/es980500g.
Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), B141–B142.
Cranor, C. (2009). A plea for a rich conception of risks. In L. Asveld & S. Roeser (Eds.), The ethics of technological risk (pp. 27–39). London: Earthscan.
Daniels, S. E., Lawrence, R. L., & Alig, R. J. (1996). Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: Applying the Vroom-Yetton model to public participation strategy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(1), 13–30. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(95)00105-0.
Davies, A. (2001). What silence knows––planning, public participation and environmental values. Environmental Values, 10, 77–102.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.
Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Douglas, H. (2005). Inserting the public into science. In P. Weingart & S. Maasen (Eds.), Democritization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making (Vol. 24, pp. 153–169, Sociology and the Sciences). Netherlands: Springer.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 226–243.
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.
Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11–34). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hagmann, J.E.C., Murwira, K., & Connolly, M. (1999). Putting process into practice: Operationalising participatory extension (Network Paper No. 94(July) pp. 1–18). London: Agricultural Research and Extension Network.
Hargrove, E. (2008). A traditional and multicultural approach to environmental ethics at primary and secondary school levels. Environmental Ethics, 30(3), 263–272.
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2006). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. In M. E. Winston & R. D. Edelbach (Eds.), Society, ethics and technology (pp. 102–113). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage.
Karinen, R., & Guston, D.H. (2010). Toward anticipatory governance: The experience with nanotechnology (pp. 217–232). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kasemir, B., Jager, J., Jaeger, C., & Gardner, M. T. (Eds.). (2003). Public participation in sustainability science: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kawall, J. (2009). The epistemic demands of environmental virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1–2), 109–128.
Kleinman, D. L. (Ed.). (2000). Science, technology, and democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Korhonen, J., & Seager, T. P. (2008). Beyond eco-efficiency: A resilience perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(7), 411–419.
Kreuter, M. W., De Rosa, C., Howze, E. H., & Baldwin, G. T. (2004). Understanding wicked problems: A key to advancing environmental health promotion. Health Education and Behavior, 31(4), 441–454. doi:10.1177/1090198104265597.
Lach, D., Rayner, S., & Ingram, H. (2005). Taming the waters: Strategies to domesticate the wicked problems of water resource management. International Journal of Water, 3(1), 1–17.
McGregor, D. (2008). Linking traditional ecological knowledge and western science: Aboriginal perspectives from the 2000 state of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 27(1), 139–158.
McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research (Qualitative research methods, Vol. 52). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences (SUNY series, teacher preparation and development). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (1999). Critical thinking: Basic theory and instructional structures handbook. New York: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 29(4), 325–342. doi:10.1177/0270467609336308.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rittel, H. W. J. (1972). On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the first and second generations. Bedriftskonomen, 8, 390–396.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30, 251–290.
Sandler, R. (2007). Character and environment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Saylan, C., & Blumstein, D. T. (2011). The failure of environmental education and how we can fix it. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scott, W., & Oulton, C. (1998). Environmental values education: An exploration of its role in the school curriculum. Journal of Moral Education, 27(2), 209–224.
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (2002). Environmental Justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy (Environmental ethics and science policy series.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (2007). Taking action, saving lives: Our duties to protect environmental and public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sprod, T. (2001). Philosophical discussion in moral education. London: Routledge.
Stables, A. (2001). Who Drew the Sky? Conflicting assumptions in environmental education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2), 245–256.
Stafford, S. (2010). Intellectual virtues in environmental virtue ethics. Environmental Ethics, 32(4), 339–352.
Stern, P. C., & Fineberg, H. V. (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Thomas, J. C. (1990). Public involvement in public management: Adapting and testing a borrowed theory. Public Administration Review, 50, 435–445.
Ulrich, W. (2003). Beyond methodology: Critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(4), 325–342.
van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug017.
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1978). On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(2), 151–162. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.2.151.
Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2002). Unlocking the puzzle of public participation. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 22(3), 179–189. doi:10.1177/02767602022003002.
Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2006). Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making: Combined results from 10 case studies. Policy Studies Journal, 34(4), 699–722.
Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research (Sage focus editions, Vol. 123). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Whyte, K. P., & Crease, R. (2010). Trust, expertise and the philosophy of science. Synthese, 177(3), 411–425.
Wilson, K., & Morren, G. (1990). Systems approaches for improving agriculture and natural resource management. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage Publications.
Acknowledgments
Research for this essay is funded by a grant from the Spencer Foundation. The authors wish also to thank Paul Thompson and two anonymous referees of this journal for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferkany, M., Whyte, K.P. The Importance of Participatory Virtues in the Future of Environmental Education. J Agric Environ Ethics 25, 419–434 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9312-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9312-8