Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation or Preservation? A Qualitative Study of the Conceptual Foundations of Natural Resource Management

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few disputes in the annals of US environmentalism enjoy the pedigree of the conservation-preservation debate. Yet, although many scholars have written extensively on the meaning and history of conservation and preservation in American environmental thought and practice, the resonance of these concepts outside the academic literature has not been sufficiently examined. Given the significance of the ideals of conservation and preservation in the justification of environmental policy and management, however, we believe that a more detailed analysis of the real-world use and understanding of these ideas is needed. In this paper, we describe the results of a qualitative, semantic study of the concepts of conservation and preservation undertaken in the context of the Chattahoochee National Forest (CNF), located in northern Georgia (USA). Thirty in-depth interviews were conducted with scientists and north Georgia residents either interested or involved in the future management of the forest. Respondents were asked to define conservation and preservation in their own words and to indicate which approach they felt was more appropriate for the management of the CNF. Qualitative content analysis was used to elicit a set of recurring themes for each foundational concept. Taken together, these themes help to flesh out the meaning of conservation and preservation for citizens and scientists today, and illustrate the evolving nature of two of the more significant and venerable ideas animating US environmental policy and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews R. N. L. (1999) Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengston D. N., T. J. Webb, D. P. Fan (2004) Shifting Forest Value Orientations in the United States, 1980–2001: A Computer Content Analysis. Environmental Values 13:373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B. L. (1998) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin D. B. (1992) Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P., S. Zavestoski, B. Mayer, S. McCormick, P. S. Webster (2002) Policy Issues in Environmental Health Disputes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584:175–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle R. J. (2000) Agency, Democracy, and Nature: The US Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary D. A. (1986) Timber and the Forest Service University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley E. A. (2004) U.S. National Forest Policies Regarding Logging: A Case Study of Citizens and Scientists in the Chattahoochee National Forest. Policy Studies 25:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortner H. J. and M. A. Moote (1999) The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R., B. G. Norton, B. D. Haskell (eds.) (1992) Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall B. and G. Sessions (1985) Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Gibbs Smith, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands B. H. M. and K. F. Wiersum (2001) Forestry and Rural Development in Europe: An Exploration of Socio-Political Discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 3:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick U (1998) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox S. (1981) The American Conservation Movement: John Muir and His Legacy. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays S. P. (1959) Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt P. W. (1994) A Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests since World War Two. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz E. (1997) Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community. Rowman & Littlefield, Inc, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W., J. S. Boster, and J. A. Hartley (1996) Environmental Values in American Culture MIT Press, Cambridge, MA new edn

  • Lee, J. (2003) A Call for Softer, Greener Language. The New York Times, Sunday March 2, p. A18

  • Luntz, F., The Environment: A Cleaner, Safer, Healthier America (2003). Available at http://www.ewg.org/briefings/luntzmemo/pdf/LuntzResearch_environment.pdf

  • Manning R. E., W. A. Valliere, B. A. Minteer (1999) Values, Ethics, and Attitudes Toward National Forest Management: An Empirical Study. Society and Natural Resources 12:421–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C. and G. B. Rossman (1995) Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick S., P. Brown, S. Zavestoski (2003) The Personal is Scientific, the Scientific is Political: The Public Paradigm of the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement. Sociological Forum 18:545–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe G. K. and C. R. Carroll (eds.) (1997) Principles of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Meine C. (2004) Correction Lines: Essays on Land, Leopold, and Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C. (2001) Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, C. J. Atman (2002) Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash R. F. (2001) Wilderness and the American Mind. 4th edn Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton B. G. (1986) Conservation and Preservation: A Conceptual Rehabilitation. Environmental Ethics 8:195–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton B. G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates J. F. (1999) Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies Are Failing in West Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Paehlke R. (1989) Environmentalism and the Future of Progressive Politics. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore J. (1974) Man’s Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S. T. A. and R. S. Ostfeld (1995) The Shifting Paradigm in Ecology. In: R. L. Knight, S. H. Bates (eds) A New Century for Natural Resources Management. Island Press, Washington, DC pp. 261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport D., R. Costanza, P. R. Epstein, C. Gaudet, R. Levins (1998) Ecosystem Health. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger J. F. (2001) American Sportsmen and the Origins of Conservation. 3rd edn Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Righter R. W. (2005) The Battle over Hetch Hetchy: America’s Most Controversial Dam and the Birth of Modern Environmentalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J. G. (1993) The Limits to Caring: Sustainable Living and the Loss of Biodiversity. Conservation Biology 7:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston H. III (1994) Conserving Natural Value. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook, C. (2001), “Off-Road Vehicles Trample Protected Georgia Forest,” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution March 1, p. D3

  • Seabrook, C., “New Forest Plan, Same Old Dispute: Environmentalists Fear ‚Healthy’ Logging Rules,” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution February 9 (2004), p.␣A1

  • Seidman I. (1998) Interviewing as Qualitative Research. 2nd edn Teacher’s College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, H. K. (2004) The US Forest Service: A History, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, centennial ed

  • Steel B, P. List, B. Shindler (1994) Conflicting Values about Federal Forests: A Comparison of National and Oregon Publics. Society and Natural Resources 7:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S. and N. M. Bradburn (1982) Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Takacs D. (1996) The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J. (1999) Requiem for Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindall D. B. (2003) Social Values and the Contingent Nature of Public Opinion and Attitudes about Forests. Forestry Chronicle 79:692–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining J. and E. Tyler (1999) Values, Emotions and Desired Outcomes Reflected in Public Responses to Forest Management Plans. Human Ecology Review 6:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear, D. N. and J. G. Greis, Southern Forest Resource Assessment. General Technical Report, Srs-53. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, 2002

  • Weiss R. S. (1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M. (1989) Americans and Their Forests: A Historical Geography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. O. (2002) The Future of Life. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and O. L. Loucks (1995) From Balance-of-Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70:439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavestoski S., P. Brown, M. Linder, S. McCormick, B. Mayer (2002) Science, Policy, Activism, and War: Defining the Health of Gulf War Veterans. Science Technology & Human Values 27:171–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Dimensions Faculty, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 85287-4501, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Ben A. Minteer

  2. School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, 85004-0687, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Elizabeth A. Corley

Authors
  1. Ben A. Minteer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth A. Corley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben A. Minteer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minteer, B.A., Corley, E.A. Conservation or Preservation? A Qualitative Study of the Conceptual Foundations of Natural Resource Management. J Agric Environ Ethics 20, 307–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9040-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9040-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation