Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Critically reflective practice in visual communication design teaching for higher education undergraduate program

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study explores the impact of critical reflection on visual communication design teaching for undergraduate programs in Pakistan. Critical reflection is a self-initiated thinking tool with practical implications to improve teaching and professional practices. The qualitative phenomenological research included teachers and practitioners from the private and public sector, art and design institutions to learn about reflective practices in their lived experiences. Participants shared their teaching processes, experiences, critical incidents, and personal and social influences to analyze the significance of the critically reflective practice. Four significant themes emerged from the data; participants’ perception of critically reflective practice, its methods, significance and challenges. Critically reflective practice is a collective process and the insights gained from this process help teachers and professionals to transform and break routinized practices. It is not limited in its process and methods, for most of the participants, a suitable time for reflection is between semesters. Students’ assessment and design project evaluation is also a good time to reflect on teaching and learning. Though challenges in critically reflective practice are multifaceted external factors play a vital role in the development of critically reflective practice culture in academic institutions. Within the given research settings the study holds ample opportunities to explore critical reflection in visual communication design education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. (2012). Repositioning the graphic designer as researcher. Iridescent, 2(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaiklock, D. (2010). Connecting student design practice to design research through a critical reflection framework. Occasional Papers on Learning and Teaching at UniSA 2010, paper, 1.

  • Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Dictionary. (2019). Retrieved from Cambridge Dictionary: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/critical-incident.

  • Collingridge, D. S., & Gantt, E. E. (2008). The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality, 23(5), 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los angeles: University of Nebraska-Lincoln; SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933/1993). How we think: A re-statement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process. Boston: D.C. Heath, & Co.

  • Ellmers, G. B. (2014). Design education: Fostering the conditions for transfer through a structured and critical approach to reflective practice. DS 81: Proceedings of NordDesign 2014. Espoo, Finland.

  • Ellmers, G., Bennett, S., & Brown, I. (2009). Graphic design pedagogy: Employing reflection to support the articulation of knowledge and learning from the design experience. London: Experiential Method, Knowledge and Methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, K. F. (2014). Teacher training education programme in three Muslim countries—Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 729–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frascara, J. (2004). Communication design: Principles, methods and practice. New York, NY: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frascara, J., & Winkler, D. (2008). Jorge Frascara and Dietmar Winkler on design research. Design Research Quarterly, 3, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoodbhoy, P. (2009). Pakistan’s higher education system-what went wrong and how to fix it. The Pakistan Development Review, 48(4-II), 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, K. R. (2018). Critical incidents for teachers’ professional development. Journal of NELTA Surkhet, 5, 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantawala, A. (2012). Art education in colonial India: Implementation and imposition. Studies in Art Education, 53(3), 208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, K. (2010). Visual communication research designs. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, U. A. (2010). Why Pakistanis are among the least innovative in the world. Retrieved from DAWN: https://www.dawn.com/news/1257273

  • Kirk, C., & Pitches, J. (2013). Digital reflection: Using digital technologies to enhance and embed creative processes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koole, S., Dornan, T., Aper, L., Scherpbier, A., Valcke, M., Cohen-Schotanus, J., et al. (2011). Factors confounding the assessment of reflection: A critical review. BMC Medical Education, 11(104), 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (2008). Metaphor and pedagogy in the design practicum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, P., Mathew, P., & Peechattu, P. J. (2017). Reflective practices: A means to teacher development. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology (APJCECT), 3(1), 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memon, G. R. (2007). Education in pakistan: The key issues, problems and the new challenges. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research—a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at john dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(n4), 842–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. (2011). Teaching critical reflection. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N., & Pascal, J. (2012). Developing critically reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 13(2), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Woerkom, M. (2010). Critical reflection as a rationalistic ideal. Adult Education Quarterly, 60, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anwer Ali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A. Critically reflective practice in visual communication design teaching for higher education undergraduate program. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 1063–1078 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09626-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09626-6

Keywords

Navigation