Abstract
Design thinking holds the key to innovation processes, but is often difficult to detect because of its implicit nature. We undertook a study of novice designers engaged in team-based design exercises in order to explore the correlation between design thinking and designers’ physical (observable) behavior and to identify new, objective, design thinking identification methods. Our study addresses the topic by using data collection method of “think aloud” and data analysis method of “protocol analysis” along with the unconstrained concept generation environment. Collected data from the participants without service design experience were analyzed by open and selective coding. Through the research, we found correlations between physical activity and divergent thinking, and also identified physical behaviors that predict a designer’s transition to divergent thinking. We conclude that there are significant relations between designers’ design thinking and the behavioral features of their body and face. This approach opens possible new ways to undertake design process research and also design capability evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R., & Atman, C. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. FIE ‘99. 29th Annual, 1, 11A6/13-11A6/18.
Alexiou, K., Zamenopoulos, T., & Gilbert, S. (2011). Imaging the designing brain: a neurocognitive exploration of design thinking. Design Computing & Cognition'10, 489–504.
Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. C. (1995). Structured and opportunistic processing in design: A critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(1), 131–151.
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95.
Behoora, I., & Tucker, C. S. (2015). Machine learning classification of design team members’ body language patterns for real time emotional state detection. Design Studies, 39, 100–127.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Cash, P., Stanković, T., & Štorga, M. (2014). Using visual information analysis to explore complex patterns in the activity of designers. Design Studies, 35(1), 1–28.
Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1992). Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: A protocol study. Design Theory and Methodology, 42(2), 131–140.
Convertino, G., Ganoe, C. H., Schafer, W. A., Yost, B., & Carroll, J. M. (2005). A multiple view approach to support common ground in distributed and synchronous geo-collaboration. In Coordinated and multiple views in exploratory visualization (pp. 121–132).
Cross, N. (2008). Engineering design methods. Hoboken: Wiley.
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1996). Analysing design activity. Materials and Design, 16(2), 122–123.
Dorst, C. H. (1997). Describing design: a comparison of paradigms. Industrial Design Engineering, 25–81.
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.
Dreyfus, H. L. (2003). The Spinoza Lectures. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Dubberly, H. (2012). How do you design? A compendium of models (Vol. 10(8)). San Francisco: Dubberly Design Office.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (pp. 397–423). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Purdy, M. T., Kopacz, M., Sager, P. L., Carouge, C., et al. (2010). Source attribution and interannual variability of arctic pollution in spring constrained by aircraft (arctas, arcpac) and satellite (airs) observations of carbon monoxide. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(3), 977–996.
Gero, J. S., & Neill, T. M. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19(1), 21–61.
Gunes, H., & Piccardi, M. (2007). Bi-modal emotion recognition from expressive face and body gestures. Journal of Network & Computer Applications, 30(4), 1334–1345.
Klein, G. (1998). Sources of Power: How people make Decisions (pp. 1–323). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Knight, H., & Simmons, R. (2013). Estimating human interest and attention via gaze analysis. In IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 4350–4355).
Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443–457.
Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Design expertise (pp. 98–99). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426.
Mahmoud, M., & Robinson, P. (2011). Interpreting hand-over-face gestures. International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 6975, 248–255.
Manhas, C., & Bakhshi, A. (2011). Relating occupational self efficacy to team effectiveness. European Journal of Business & Management, 3(2), 165–172.
Mari, D. D., & Kotz, S. (2001). Correlation and Dependence. Correlation and dependence: Imperial College Press.
Park, S., Scherer, S., Gratch, J., Carnevale, P., & Morency, L. P. (2013). Mutual behaviors during dyadic negotiation: Automatic prediction of respondent reactions. In T. Pun, C. Pelachaud, & N. Sebe (Eds.), 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (pp. 423–428). Los Alomitos, CA: IEEE.
Pedgley, O. (2007). Capturing and analysing own design activity. Design Studies, 28(5), 463–483.
Popovic, V. (2003). Expert and novice users model and their application to the design process. In Journal of the Asian Design International Conference. Japan: University of Tsukuba.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Shah, J. J., Millsap, R. E., Woodward, J., & Smith, S. M. (2012). Applied tests of design skills—Part 1: Divergent thinking. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134(2), 689–698.
Tomasi, D., & Volkow, N. D. (2010). Functional connectivity density mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(21), 9885–9890.
Tucker, R., & Abbasi, N. (2012). Conceptualizing teamwork and group-work in architecture and related design disciplines. In ASA 2012 : Building on knowledge, theory and practice : Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association, Architectural Science Association, Gold Coast, Qld. (pp. 1–8).
Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249–271.
Wang, J., & Zheng, N. (2013). A novel fractal image compression scheme with block classification and sorting based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22(9), 3690–3702.
Williams, S. D. (2004). Personality, attitude, and leader influences on divergent thinking and creativity in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 187–204.
Wu, W. J., & Xu, Y. (2010). Correlation analysis of visual verb’s subcategorization based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient, International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC) (pp. 2042–2046).
Xiao, B., Georgiou, P., Baucom, B., & Narayanan, S. S. (2015). Head motion modeling for human behavior analysis in dyadic interaction. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17(7), 1107–1119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, Y., Du, X., Bryan-Kinns, N. et al. Identifying divergent design thinking through the observable behavior of service design novices. Int J Technol Des Educ 29, 1179–1191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9479-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9479-7