Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pedagogical and technological replanning: a successful case study on integration and transversal skills for engineering freshmen

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Replanning is often used to optimize results of an activity in an ever changing world. To address the challenge of preparing future engineers for success, a special course was created for all engineering freshmen of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, in Portugal. Presented as a case study, this special course underwent a careful replanning as a result of several years of experience in teaching practice alongside with a theoretical deepening in pedagogical and technological issues, under the aegis of the action-research methodology. Within the context of the case study course, the mentioned replanning was also based on a theoretical approach that clearly identifies teaching–learning-assessment methodologies that promote regulation from those that foster emancipation, using a specific instrument: a taxonomy of educational processes. The replanning was designed to globally boost results regarding the educational aims of the course such as furthering freshmen’s integration into work environment and preparing them for success by fostering transversal skills (needed for study and work). Technology is seen as a mean of education enrichment as well as a productivity tool. The introduced innovations include fun-but-educational activities, several types of assessment over time and specific technological tools which were critical for the educational impact/achievement of this course. Success is demonstrated by encouraging feedback from the stakeholders, high students’ classifications and a steady reduction in retention. It is advocated that large portions of the reasoning behind the replanning can be extrapolated to other courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(adapted from European Commission 2011)

Fig. 2

(adapted from Torres 2013)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As stated in the European Commission reports ICT-skills include Information & Communication Technology Skills and E-Skills, covering three main categories: ICT practitioner skills, ICT user skills and e-Leadership skills.

  2. Pedagogical work modes are introduced and developed by Marcel Lesne (1977).

References

  • Adams, J., & Morgan, G. (2007). “Second generation” e-learning: Characteristics and design principles for supporting management soft-skills development. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(2), 157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andretta, S. (2005). From prescribed reading to the excitement or the burden of choice. Aslib Proceedings, 57(2), 181–190. doi:10.1108/00012530510589146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, T., & Milovic, S. (2010). Action research as a tool of professional development of advisers and teachers in Croatia. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Oxon: Routledge-Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2005). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key competences for lifelong learning. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/com/com_com(2005)0548_/com_com(2005)0548_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

  • Cullen, P. (2007). Developing and implementing models of flexible learning. International Journal of Learning, 14(7), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. (2009). The developing the field of technology education: An introduction. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 1–9). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Philosophy of education (Problems of men). California: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainability. ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez-Ayres, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Pardo, A., Crespo-García, R., Leony, D., et al. (2015). A methodology for improving active learning engineering courses with a large number of students and teachers through feedback gathering and iterative refinement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Transferability of skills across economic sectors: Role and importance for employment at European level. http://vital.new.voced.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/ngv:51660. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.

  • FEUP. (2005). “Boletim Informativo da FEUP” (in Portuguese) FEUP’s official informational bulletin, 3rd trimester 2005—accessible through https://issuu.com/feup/docs/bi33. Accessed 18 April 2016.

  • FEUP. (2014). Official sheet “FEUP in Figures”, Year 2014. https://sigarra.up.pt/feup/en/web_base.gera_pagina?p_pagina=21919, FEUP 2014. Accessed 18 April 2016.

  • FEUP. (2016). FEUP’s institutional site, 2016 http://fe.up.pt. Accessed 18 April 2016.

  • Flessner, R., & Stuckey, S. (2014). Politics and action research: An examination of one school’s action research program. Action Research, 12(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1987). Pedagogia do oprimido. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogia da autonomia. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, L., Sanderson, P., & O’Neil, M. (1996). Fostering deep and active learning through assessment. Accounting Education, 5(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–603). California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, O., & Botomé, S. (2001). Ensino-aprendizagem: uma interação entre dois processos comportamentais. Interação em Psicologia, 5, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, S., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, P. (2004). Time to cut the cables? Times higher educational supplement (pp. 8–9), 30 April.

  • Lesne, M. (1977). Travail pédagogique et formation d’adultes: éléments d’analyse. Paris: Puf Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levia, D., & Quiring, S. (2008). Assessment of student learning in a hybrid PBL capstone seminar. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(2), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lickert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone. (2011). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.

  • Ljungman, A., & Silén, C. (2008). Examination involving students as peer examiners. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, G. (1996). Application and transformation of action research in educational research and practice. Systems Practice, 9(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouraz, A., & Sousa, A. (2015). An institutional approach to first-year adjustment: The “Projeto FEUP” case study of a Portuguese University. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. doi:10.1177/1538192715592928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, E. (2006). But let us not forget John Collier: Commentary on David Bargal’s ‘Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin’s paradigm on action research’. Action Research, 4(4), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PF. (2015). Projeto FEUP course official fact sheet for year 2014/2015. https://sigarra.up.pt/feup/en/UCURR_GERAL.FICHA_UC_VIEW?pv_ocorrencia_id=353321. Accessed 18 April 2016.

  • Pundak, D., Herscovitz, O., & Shacham, M. (2010). Attitudes of face-to-face and e-learning instructors toward “Active Learning”. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, Y., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, A., & Mouraz, A. (2014). Promoting ‘Soft Skills’ from the start of the engineering degree and the case study of the special ‘Projeto FEUP’ course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30 (6B), 1539–1548. http://www.ijee.ie/contents/c300614B.html.

  • Sousa, A., Torres, M., Lopes, C., Ramos, T., & Moreira, L. (2015). Lessons from a B-Learning course in Information Literacy for Engineering Freshmen. In The e-Learning excellence award 2015: An anthology of case histories (pp. 96–113). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.

  • Torres, M. (2013). Modos de trabalho pedagógico e de avaliação da aprendizagem no ensino superiorum estudo na Universidade do Porto (PhD Thesis). Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. http://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/67683. Accessed 17 November 2015.

  • Torres, M. (2014, May). Structured projects for soft skills development: Providing engineering students with international competences. Communication presented in ACE FORUMAlliance for Cooperation in Engineering“Fostering international collaboration in the 2020 framework”, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

  • Torres, M., & Leite, C. (2014). Assessment of and for learning in higher education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urs, D. (2013). Soft skills for the engineering students. Synergy, 9(2), 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallenga, D., Grypdonk, M., Hoogwerf, L., & Tan, F. (2009). Action research: What, why and how? Acta Neurologica Belgica, 109(2), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bogaard, M. (2015). Towards an action-oriented model for first year engineering student success. A mixed methods approach (PhD Thesis). Technische Universiteit Delft, Rotterdam, Netherlands. http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid:7e3ea63e-3f28-4f9d-a340-95acc8828763/. Accessed 17 Nov 2015.

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen & N. Postlewaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 162–163). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the direction of FEUP, Fernanda Torres and all those who believed and were involved in Projeto FEUP, especially Luciano Moreira, Teresa Ramos and Cristina Lopes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel F. Torres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres, M.F., Sousa, A.J. & Torres, R.T. Pedagogical and technological replanning: a successful case study on integration and transversal skills for engineering freshmen. Int J Technol Des Educ 28, 573–591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9399-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9399-y

Keywords

Navigation