Abstract
Purpose
To compare the repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), corneal topography (CT) with a combined Scheimpflug–Placido system, optical biometry (OB), specular microscopy (SM), and ultrasound pachymetry (UP).
Methods
A single observer measured CCT twice in 150 eyes of 150 subjects with each of five devices: Nidek RS-3000 Advance OCT, CSO Sirius combined Scheimpflug–Placido disc system CT, Nidek AL-Scan partial coherence interferometry-based OB, Tomey EM-3000 SM, and Reichert iPac ultrasonic pachymeter. Pachymetry values corrected by the SM device software were also recorded. Levels of agreement between devices were evaluated by Bland–Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, and repeatability for each device was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results
The mean CCTs measured by OCT, CT, OB, SM, corrected SM, and UP were 544.60 ± 29.56, 536.19 ± 32.14, 528.29 ± 29.45, 524.88 ± 32.38, 537.88 ± 32.38, and 545.29 ± 30.75 μm, respectively. Mean CCT differed significantly between the devices (p < 0.05) apart from between OCT and UP, and between CT and corrected SM. Mean paired differences between devices ranged between 0.68 and 20.41 μm. Repeatability with all devices was excellent (> 0.99). The range of limits of agreement was the least between OCT and UP.
Conclusions
Different CCT measurement techniques produce quite different results, so CCT evaluation and follow-up should be performed using the same device or devices with close compatibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C (2005) Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 82(10):892–899
Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U et al (2005) Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(9):1729–1735
Chakrabarti HS, Craig JP, Brahma A, Malik TY, McGhee CN (2001) Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 27(11):1823–1828
Doughty MJ, Jonuscheit S (2010) The orbscan acoustic (correction) factor for central corneal thickness measures of normal human corneas. Eye Contact Lens 36(2):106–115
Gonul S, Koktekir BE, Bakbak B, Gedik S (2014) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera. Arq Bras Oftalmol 77(6):345–350
Khaja WA, Grover S, Kelmenson AT, Ferguson LR, Sambhav K, Chalam KV (2015) Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan. Clin Ophthalmol 9:1065–1070
Bechmann M, Thiel M, Roesen B et al (2000) Central corneal thickness determined with optical coherence tomography in various types of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 84(11):1233–1237
Wirbelauer C, Scholz C, Hoerauf H et al (2002) Noncontact corneal pachymetry with slit lamp-adapted optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 133(4):444–450
Wong AC-M, Wong C-C, Yuen NS-Y et al (2002) Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye 16(6):715–721
Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y et al (2006) Comparison of central corneal thickness by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology 113(6):937–941
Li H, Leung CK, Wong L et al (2008) Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 115(5):796–801
Rao HL, Kumar AU, Kumar A et al (2011) Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects. Cornea 30(2):121–126
Beutelspacher SC, Serbecic N, Scheuerle AF (2011) Assessment of central corneal thickness using OCT, ultrasound, optical low coherence reflectometry and Scheimpflug pachymetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 21(2):132–137
Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, Feuer WJ, Barton K (2008) Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography vs ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 145(2):228–232
Bayhan HA, Aslan Bayhan S, Can I (2014) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. Int J Ophthalmol 7(2):302–308
Randleman JB, Lynn MJ, Perez-Straziota CE, Weissman HM, Kim SW (2015) Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thickness measurements with scanning-slit, Scheimpflug and Fourier-domain ocular coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 99(9):1176–1181
Sedaghat MR, Daneshvar R, Kargozar A, Derakhshan A, Daraei M (2010) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymetry, rotating Scheimpflug camera, and scanning-slit topography. Am J Ophthalmol 150(6):780–789
Módis L Jr, Szalai E, Németh G, Berta A (2011) Reliability of the corneal thickness measurements with the Pentacam HR imaging system and ultrasound pachymetry. Cornea 30(5):561–566
Bao F, Wang Q, Cheng S et al (2014) Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices. Cornea 33(6):576–581
Scotto R, Bagnis A, Papadia M, Cutolo CA, Risso D, Traverso CE (2017) Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasonic pachymetry, anterior segment OCT and noncontact specular microscopy. J Glaucoma 26(10):860–865
Pierro L, Iuliano L, Gagliardi M, Ambrosi A, Rama P, Bandello F (2016) Central corneal thickness reproducibility among ten different instruments. Optom Vis Sci 93(11):1371–1379
McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K (2015) Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(12):2598–2604
Funding
This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The ethical approval was obtained from Kırıkkale University Clinical Research Ethical Committee, Date: 10.11.2015, Number: 25/08.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gokcinar, N.B., Yumusak, E., Ornek, N. et al. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter. Int Ophthalmol 39, 1589–1598 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0983-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0983-2