Skip to main content
Log in

Intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: an evidence mapping and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Inflammopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment for COVID-19 remain controversial. This study aimed to map the current status and gaps of available evidence, and conduct a meta-analysis to further investigate the benefit of IVIg in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs), primary studies with control groups, reporting on the use of IVIg in patients with COVID-19. A random-effects meta-analysis with subgroup analyses regarding study design and patient disease severity was performed. Our outcomes of interest determined by the evidence mapping, were mortality, length of hospitalization (days), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (days), number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and adverse events.

Results

We included 34 studies (12 SR/MAs, 8 prospective and 14 retrospective studies). A total of 5571 hospitalized patients were involved in 22 primary studies. Random-effects meta-analyses of very low to moderate evidence showed that there was little or no difference between IVIg and standard care or placebo in reducing mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.06; risk difference [RD] 3.3% fewer), length of hospital (mean difference [MD] 0.37; 95% CI − 2.56, 3.31) and ICU (MD 0.36; 95% CI − 0.81, 1.53) stays, mechanical ventilation use (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68–1.24; RD 2.8% fewer), and adverse events (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.84–1.14; RD 0.5% fewer) of patients with COVID-19. Sensitivity analysis using a fixed-effects model indicated that IVIg may reduce mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60–0.97), and increase length of hospital stay (MD 0.68; 95% CI 0.09–1.28).

Conclusion

Very low to moderate certainty of evidence indicated IVIg may not improve the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Given the discrepancy between the random- and fixed-effects model results, further large-scale and well-designed RCTs are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Science and technology Project of “Gansu Prescription” Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 (Project No. 22ZD1FA001). The funding source had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KY, ML, YL, and YW: conceived and designed the study. ML, YL: designed and performed the search strategy. ML, YL, ML, KG, MM, XW, NM, DL, ZL, LG, and XW: screened and selected the articles, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. ML and XX: analysed the data. LY and KY: supervised the data analysis. ML and XX: rated the certainty of evidence. LY and KY provided methodological support. ML, YL, XX, JN and KY: interpreted the data. ML and YL: drafted the manuscript. JJ, ZZ, BP, WS, ZS, YW, and KY: revised the manuscript, all authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhi-ming Zhang, Yong-feng Wang or Ke-hu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript to declare.

Ethical approval

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences of Lanzhou University has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 240 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Mx., Li, Yf., Xing, X. et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: an evidence mapping and meta-analysis. Inflammopharmacol 32, 335–354 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01398-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01398-4

Keywords

Navigation