Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Selective Attention and Professional Knowledge–Based Reasoning About Students’ Statistical Thinking

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined preservice mathematics teachers’ selective attention and knowledge-based reasoning as they viewed a statistics lesson video. Analysis for this study was based on preservice teachers’ written explanations for noteworthy moments they identified when watching the video. Findings indicated that, with regard to the preservice teachers’ selective attention, they attended more to the teacher’s pedagogy in the video than to students and students’ statistical thinking. Analysis of the preservice teachers’ knowledge–based reasoning revealed that they were more likely to use an interpretive stance than a descriptive or an evaluate stance to reason about what they observed. The preservice teachers, however, were less likely to draw on their statistical knowledge needed for teaching to reason about students’ statistical thinking. Rather, the preservice teachers’ noticing was informed by their general pedagogical knowledge or knowledge that was unrelated to statistical thinking. The current study suggests that professional knowledge for teaching in a particular domain should be incorporated into the examination of teacher noticing in order to better understand the ways in which teachers notice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2007). The role of attention in expert classroom practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79–95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2008). Introducing the emerging discipline of statistics education. School Science and Mathematics, 108(8), 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, T. (2009). Teacher knowledge and statistics: What types of knowledge are used in the primary classroom? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callejo, M. L., & Zapatera, A. (2017). Prospective primary teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of pattern generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, M. C., & Anderson, N. C. (2013). Classroom discussions in math: A teacher’s guide for using talk moves to support the common core and more, grades K–6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved January 27, 2020, from http://corestandards.org/asserts/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.

  • delMas, R. (2004). A comparison of mathematical and statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79–95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • delMas, R., Garfield, J., & Zieffler, A. (2014). Using TinkerPlots™ to develop tertiary students’ statistical thinking in a modeling-based introductory statistics class. In T. Wassong, D. Frischemeier, P. Fischer, R. Hochmuth, & P. Bender (Eds.), Mit werkzeugen mathematik und stochastik lernen (using tools for learning mathematics and statistics) (pp. 405–420). Springer Spektrum: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M., Kalinec-Craig, C. A., & Shih, J. C. (2018). The problem of Sunny’s pennies: A multi-institutional study about the development of elementary preservice teachers’ professional noticing. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(2), 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, L. K. (2017). Investigating the relationship between professional noticing and specialized content knowledge. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 339–358). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through on-line discussions. ZDM, 44(6), 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C., Bargagliotto, A., Case, C., Kader, G., Scheaffer, R., & Spangler, D. (2015). The statistical education of teachers. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved January 27, 2020, from http://www.amstat.org/education/SET/SET.pdf.

  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D. S., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A preK-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

  • Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, R. E. (2007). Toward a conceptualization of statistical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 427–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, R. E. (2013). Characterizing key developmental understandings and pedagogically powerful ideas within a statistical knowledge for teaching framework. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., & Spangler, D. A. (2017). Research on core practices in K-12 mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 766–792). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Kilic, H. (2018). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ noticing skills and scaffolding practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, G., Wolf, M. A., & Frye, D. (2015). Educating educators: Designing MOOCs for professional learning. In P. Kim (Ed.), The MOOC revolution: Massive open online courses and the future of education (pp. 117–146). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, M., & Gröschner, A. (2016). Fostering preservice teachers’ noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online-and video-based intervention study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langrall, C. W., Makar, K., Nilsson, P., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2017). The teaching and learning of probability and statistics: An integrated perspective. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 490–525). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2002). Comparing two distributions: Investigating secondary teachers’ statistical thinking. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Developing a statistically literate society, Cape Town, South Africa. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Males, L. M. (2017). Using video of peer teaching to examine grades 6–12 preservice teachers’ noticing. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 91–109). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London, England: Routledge-Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. N., & Marin, K. A. (2015). Examining the use of a structured analysis framework to support prospective teacher noticing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematics success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, J. A. (2011). Graduate teaching assistants’ statistical content knowledge of sampling. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 48–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. J. (2000). Statistical thinking and statistical practice: Themes gleaned from professional statisticians. Statistical Science, 15(2), 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. J. (2004). Towards an understanding of statistical thinking. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79–95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  • Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2015). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of the derivative concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1305–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J. N., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2013). Prospective elementary school teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(5), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 957–1009). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–150). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stockero, S. L. (2014). Transitions in prospective mathematics teacher noticing. In J.-J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 239–259). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stockero, S. L., & Rupnow, R. L. (2017). Measuring noticing within complex mathematics classroom interactions. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 281–301). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., Jong, C., Fisher, M. H., & Schack, E. O. (2017). Noticing and knowledge: Exploring theoretical connections between professional noticing and mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 26(2), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Kieboom, L. A., Magiera, M. T., & Moyer, J. C. (2017). Learning to notice student thinking about the equal sign: K-8 preservice teachers’ experiences in a teacher preparation program. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 141–159). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkoe, J. (2015). Exploring teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking in a video club. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is based on dissertation research conducted by Dongjo Shin at the University of Georgia and under the supervision of AnnaMarie Conner.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gifted Education Center, Korea University, 315 Lyceum, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea

    Dongjo Shin

Authors
  1. Dongjo Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongjo Shin.

Additional information

This study is a part of the author’s dissertation study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, D. Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Selective Attention and Professional Knowledge–Based Reasoning About Students’ Statistical Thinking. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 1037–1055 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10101-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10101-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation