Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Effect of Tracing Gesture in the Learning from Mathematics Worked Examples

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study attempted to replicate the previous results of Hu et al. (Learning and Instruction 35:85–93 2015) and further examined the boundary condition of tracing gesture whether its cognitive effect is merely comparable with other attention-guiding means, i.e., textual attention cueing, in two different learning tasks in nature. In two experiments, 11- to 13-year-old students were asked to study the worked examples on angles relationships involving parallel lines (experiment 1) and laws of exponents (experiment 2) either without tracing instruction, with textual attention cueing instruction, or tracing instruction. The tracing group outperformed the other two groups on a subsequent test and reported lower levels of test difficulty in experiment 1 but not in experiment 2, suggesting that the cognitive effect of tracing gesture was beyond guiding attention in the learning from highly visuospatial-based worked examples but not in the materials that are less obviously visuospatial in nature. The present findings suggested that tracing gesture offers a simple yet effective embodied technique that may further enhance the worked example-based learning through its cognitive effect specifically on the task involved with spatial information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 307–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 247–286.

  • Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 360–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W., Duffy, R. G., & Fenn, K. M. (2013). Consolidation and transfer of learning after observing hand gesture. Child Development, 84, 1863–1871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(4), 594–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Koning, B., Tabbers, H., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. D., Ferrara, F., & Moore-Russo, D. (Eds.). (2014). Emerging perspectives on gesture and embodiment in mathematics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43(4), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., Byrne, E., & Bobis, J. (2016). Learning by tracing worked examples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Large, A., Beheshti, J., Breuleux, A., & Renaud, A. (1996). Effect of animation in enhancing descriptive and procedural texts in a multimedia learning environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(6), 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36, 569–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. Cambridge, MA: Robert Bentley, Inc.

  • Nathan, M. J., Mertz, K., & Ryan, R. (1994). Learning through self-explanation of mathematics examples: Effects of cognitive load. Paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Novack, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Learning from gesture: How our hands change our minds. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik, E., Karakus, T., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). An eye-tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 53, 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). London, England: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about non-present objects. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 602–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouw, W. T. J. L., De Nooijer, J. A., Van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A., & Paas, F. (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K., & Bolstad, C. A. (1991). Use of examples and procedures in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 753–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M., & Russo, R. (2014). A Student’s Guide to Analysis of Variance. London. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognize designers’ styles. Learning and Instruction, 19, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, W. C., Ching, T. H., Lim, P. E., Cheng, X., & Ip, K. Y. (2014). Producing gestures facilitates route learning. PLoS One, 9, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafton, J. G., & Reiser, B. J. (1993). The contributions of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1017–1022). Hillsdales, MI: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wermeskerken, M., Fijan, N., Eielts, C., & Pouw, W. T. J. L. (2016). Observation of depictive versus tracing gestures selectively aids verbal versus visual-spatial learning in primary school children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 806–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7(1), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim-Ng, Y. Y., Varley, R., & Andrade, J. (2000). Contribution of finger tracing to the recognition of Chinese characters. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(4), 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan Scholarship Program for Malaysian students, serial no. 2015001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuh-Tsuen Tzeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeo, LM., Tzeng, YT. Cognitive Effect of Tracing Gesture in the Learning from Mathematics Worked Examples. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 18, 733–751 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09987-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09987-y

Keywords

Navigation