Abstract
A growing literature on evolutionary economic geography concludes that regional industrial evolution is path-dependent and is determined by the preexisting industries. This study more accurately calculates the industry relatedness based on the co-occurrence approach to portray the production space of China’s manufacturing sectors and then examines the impact of industry relatedness on regional industrial evolution. The findings report that industry relatedness does underscore the regional structural change in China but shows significant regional differences in the evolution path. The coastal region has strong tendency of path dependence in its industrial evolution, while North West and South West break the path-dependent trajectory and transition into high productive sectors distant from their own production network. The results suggest that governmental policies can play a crucial role in creating new paths in the West. Institutions matter to allow the significant role of industry relatedness in driving regional industrial evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To make the network visualization clear, we adopt the edge-weighted spring embedded layout which use a force spring algorithm.
References
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path-dependence in the economy. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904.
Barbieri, E., Tommaso, D., Marco, R., & Bonnini, S. (2012). Industrial development policies and performance in Southern China: Beyond the specialized industrial cluster program. China Economic Review, 23, 613–625.
Bathelt, H. (2001). Regional competence and economic recovery: divergent growth paths in Boston’s high technology economy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(4), 287–314.
Bathelt, H., & Boggs, J. S. (2003). Toward a reconceptualization of regional development paths: Is Leipzig’s media cluster a continuation of or a rupture with the past? Economic Geography, 79(3), 265–293.
Bishop, P., & Gripaios, P. (2010). Spatial externalities, relatedness and sector employment growth in Great Britain. Regional Studies, 44(4), 443–454.
Boschma, R. (2013). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: Comparison of two European policy concepts (No. 1322). Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography. (JRC88242). Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.
Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307.
Boschma, R., & Gianelle, C. (2014). Regional branching and smart specialisation policy.
Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311.
Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (2007). Editorial: Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 537–548.
Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (Eds.). (2010). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2012). Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 241–256.
Boschma, R. A., & Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 213–238.
Chen, J., & Fleisher, B. (1996). Regional income inequality and economic growth in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 22(2), 141–164.
Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2014). The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy, 43(10), 1681–1696.
Cooke, P. (2007). To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms. European Planning Studies, 15(2), 179–194.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American economic review, 75(2), 332–337.
David, P.A. (1988). Path-dependence: Putting the past into the future of economics. Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Technical Report, No. 533.
Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2008). Economic institutions and FDI location choice: Evidence from US multinationals in China. Journal of comparative Economics, 36(3), 412–429.
Dumais, G., Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. L. (2002). Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 193–204.
Essletzbichler, J. (2007). Diversity, stability and regional growth in the United States, 1975–2002. In K. Frenken (Ed.), Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography (pp. 203–229). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Essletzbichler, J. (2015). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in us metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49(5), 752–766.
Fan, C. C., & Sun, M. (2008). Regional inequality in China, 1978–2006. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49(1), 1–17.
Farjoun, M. (1994). Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise, diversification and resource-related industry groups. Organization Science, 5(2), 185–199.
Felipe, J., Kumar, U., Usui, N., & Abdon, A. (2013). Why has China succeeded? And why it will continue to do so. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), 791–818.
Fleisher, B., Li, H., & Zhao, M. Q. (2010). Human capital, economic growth, and regional inequality in China. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 215–231.
Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649.
Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.
Glasmeier, A. (1991). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20(5), 469–485.
Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties. The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
Hausmann, R., & Klinger, B. (2007). The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage. Center for International Development at Harvard University.
Henning, M., Stam, E., & Wenting, R. (2013). Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Regional Studies, 47, 1348–1362.
Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.
Meyer-Stamer, J. (1998). Path dependence in regional development: Persistence and change in three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil. World Development, 26(8), 1495–1511.
Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.
Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1–2), 69–92.
Qiu, Y. (2005). Personal networks, institutional involvement and foreign direct investment flows into China’s interior. Economic Geography, 81(3), 261–281.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as innovation. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The social science view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wei, Y. D. (1999). Regional inequality in China. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 49–59.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41425001; 41271130).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Q., He, C. Production space and regional industrial evolution in China. GeoJournal 82, 379–396 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9689-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9689-4