Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can environmental regulation foster incremental enhancement and quality improvement in green technological innovation under the background of the digital development?

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China is facing increasingly severe challenges of environmental pollution and resource depletion in pursuit of economic growth. Consequently, it is imperative to investigate the influence of environmental regulations on the enhancement of quantity and quality in urban green technological innovation, alongside the role of the digital development. By leveraging panel data of 230 cities in China from 2011 to 2021, this study systematically examines the impact of environmental regulation on the quantity and quality of green technological innovation, and the moderating effect of the digital development. Findings reveal that as the level of environmental regulation rises, not only the quantity but also the quality of urban green technological innovation increase. Furthermore, the digital development further strengthens the promotional effect of environmental regulation on the quantity of urban green innovation, yet insignificantly impacting innovation quality. It is noteworthy that the favorable environment for digital development enhances the promotional effects of environmental regulations on both the quantity and quality of urban green innovation. Simultaneously, as the level of the digital development advances, environmental regulation will ultimately significantly promote the improvement in the quality of green innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Ming Zhang], upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The specific environmental-related vocabulary includes: environmental protection, energy consumption, pollution control, haze, pollution, ecology, emission reduction, discharge, green, air, low-carbon, chemical oxygen demand, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, PM10, PM2.5, desulfurization, and denitrification.

References

  • Cao, S. P., Nie, L., Sun, H. P., et al. (2021). Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: Evidence from China’s regional economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, M. R. (2014). Comparative statics of a monopolistic firm facing price-cap and command-and-control environmental regulations. Energy Economics, 46, 464–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Kahn, M. E., Liu, Y., et al. (2018). The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. Journal of Environmental Economic Management, 88, 468–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Liu, B. Y., Ma, Y. L., et al. (2023). Building back greener: Promoting performance in natural resource markets for sustainable development. Resources Policy, 86, 104220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X. F., Zheng, S. Q., & Kahn, M. E. (2019). The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 115, 103212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., & Li, M. (2022). Implementation of enterprises’ green technology innovation under market-based environmental regulation: An evolutionary game approach. Journal of Environment Management, 308, 114570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, A., Ali, S., Long, X. L., et al. (2024). Effect of digital silk road and innovation heterogeneity on digital economy growth across 29 countries: New evidence from PSM-DID. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., & Bai, Y. (2022). Strategic or substantive innovation? The impact of institutional investors’ site visits on green innovation evidence from China. Technology in Society, 68, 101904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z. Y., Wang, Z. J., & Li, Z. B. (2018). The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 482–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, S., Gupta, A., Kruk, S. R. L., et al. (2022). Scrutinizing environmental governance in a digital age: New ways of seeing, participating, and intervening. One Earth, 5(3), 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. X., & Wang, F. S. (2023). The corporate path to green innovation: Does the digital economy matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(32), 79149–79160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Chen, L., Chen, Y., et al. (2021). Digital economy, technological innovation, and green economic efficiency—empirical evidence from 277 cities in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43, 616–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. Q., & Xie, Y. J. (2023). Positive or negative? R&D subsidies and green technology innovation: Evidence from China’s renewable energy industry. Renewable Energy, 213, 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. L., Chen, Y. Y., & Liang, F. Y. (2023). The effects of digital economy on breakthrough innovations: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, S., & Sun, Y. (2020). Do selective R&D incentives from the government promote substantive innovation? Evidence from Shanghai technological enterprises. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(3), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, S. Y., Yimamu, N., Li, Y. R., et al. (2022). Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1847–1871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milani, S. (2017). The impact of environmental policy stringency on industrial R&D conditional on pollution intensity and relocation costs. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(3), 595–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mille, J. G. (2005). The political evolution of principal-agent models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noailly, J., & Smeets, R. (2015). Directing technical change from fossil-fuel to renewable energy innovation: An application using firm-level patent data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 72(3), 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, M. J., Zhao, X., Lv, K. J., et al. (2023). Internet development and carbon emission-reduction in the era of digitalization: Where will resource-based cities go? Resources Policy, 81, 103345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Van-der-Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Li, L., Han, Y., et al. (2022). The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1656–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong, K., & Luo, Y. N. (2023). Toward born sharing: The sharing economy evolution enabled by the digital ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhang, M. (2024). Environmental regulatory competition and haze pollution: Beggar thy neighbor or benefit thy neighbor? Air Quality. Atmosphere & Health, 17, 283–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. L., & Guo, J. G. (2024). New way out of efficiency-equity dilemma: Digital technology empowerment for local government environmental governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. L., Wang, W. L., Ran, Q. Y., et al. (2021a). Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: Evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(7), 9990–10004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Chen, Y. Y., Ramsey, T. S., et al. (2021b). Will researching digital technology really empower green development? Technology in Society, 66(10), 101638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. L., Si, L. L., & Hu, S. (2023). Can the penalty mechanism of mandatory environmental regulations promote green innovation? Evidence from China’s enterprise data. Energy Economics, 125, 106956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., Hao, Y., Ren, S., et al. (2021). Does internet development improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 153, 112247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. J., Wang, W., Hong, J. G., et al. (2023). Environmental decentralization and green development: The mediating role of industrial upgrading. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(44), 99965–99978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L. X., Ning, J. J., & Dong, Y. H. (2022). Pollution reduction effect of the digital transformation of heavy metal enterprises under the agglomeration effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F. F., Jiang, D., & Wang, T. (2022). The impact of green innovation on manufacturing small and medium enterprises corporate social responsibility fulfillment: The moderating role of regional environmental regulation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 712–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Yan, T. H., Gao, W., et al. (2023). How does environmental regulation affect real green technology innovation and strategic green technology innovation? Science of the Total Environment, 872, 162221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G., Liu, W., Wang, T., et al. (2021). Be regulated before be innovative? How environmental regulation makes enterprises technological innovation do better for public health. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 126965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72173094, 72174195), and Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi (2024ZC-YBXM-096).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yan Song or Ming Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y., Zhang, L., Dong, X. et al. Can environmental regulation foster incremental enhancement and quality improvement in green technological innovation under the background of the digital development?. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04862-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04862-5

Keywords

Navigation