Abstract
Riverbank erosion is an important topic in environmental research. Although several methods have been used to prevent erosion and balance ecosystems, both are still very challenging issues. We propose three different adaptation approaches to control riverbank erosion in the steppe area. The area has been affected by dramatic erosion over the past several years due to water flow and other external effects. The approaches were based on bioengineering and mechanical methods that were different in terms of the erosion rate and slope of the riverbank, the velocity and intensity of water flow, and the mechanical properties of the soil and plant species. Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) and sensitivity analysis were applied to estimate and compare the approaches. The most appropriate approaches were selected by comparing the net present value (NPV), the benefit–cost ratio, and the internal rate of return, which are the main indicators of CBA. The CBA results indicated that all the approaches had positive benefits in 2020–2030. The most economically and environmentally beneficial approach was Approach-3 (bioengineering method). A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the NPV of Approach-3 was positive in both scenarios of the pessimistic and optimistic cases of the discount rate. Monte Carlo analysis with 500 simulations was performed to obtain the future NPV. The results reveal that bioengineering methods for riverbank erosion control have higher environmental benefits and are more suitable in steppe areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A soum is the lowest level of administrative division used in rural areas of Mongolia.
References
Abbe, O. O., Harvey, C. M., Ikuma, L. H., & Aghazadeh, F. (2011). Modeling the relationship between occupational stressors, psychosocial/physical symptoms, and injuries in the construction industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.002
Atkinsoni, G., Mourato, S. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Retrieved November 24, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrp6w76tstg-en
Barakat, A., Khellouk, R., Jazouli, A. E., Touhami, F., Nadem, S. (2018). Monitoring of forest cover dynamics in eastern area of Béni-Mellal Province using ASTER and Sentinel-2A multispectral data. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 2(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2018.1452478.
Bariteau, L., Bouchard, D., Gagnon, G., Levasseur, M., Lapointe, S., & Bérubé, M. (2013). A Riverbank erosion control method with environmental value. Ecological Engineering, 58, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.004
Bonzanigo, L., & Kalra, N. (2014). Making informed investment decisions in an uncertain world: A Short demonstration. Policy research working paper No. 6765. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17310
Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (1996). Environmental economics and management. Irwin Book.
Carolus, J. F., Hanley, N., Olsen, S. B., Pedersen, S. M., et al. (2018). A bottom-up approach to environmental cost-benefit analysis. Ecological Economics, 152, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.009
Daignealt, A., Brown, P., Gawith, D., et al. (2016). Dredging versus hedging: Comparing hard infrastructure to ecosystem-based adaptation to flooding. Ecological Economics, 122, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.023
Daly, H. H. (2016). Assesment of the socio-economic value of the goods and services provided by Mediterranean forest ecosystem: Critical and comparative analysis of studies conducted in Algeria, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey. Plan Bleu, Valbonne. From www.planbleu.org, www.fao.org
Eswaran, H., Lal, R., & Reich, P. F. (2001). Land degradation: An overview. Responses to land degradation (1st ed., pp. 20–35). CRC.
European Commission. (2015). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2776/97516
Garbolino, E., Tkiouat, M., Yankevich, N., & Lachtar, D. (2012). Transport of dangerous goods: Methods and tools for reducing the risks of accidents and terrorist attack. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series c: Environmental Security. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2684-0
Holanda, F. S. R., & da Rocha, I. P. (2011). Streambank soil bioengineering approach to erosion control. In A. Carpi (Ed.), Progress in molecular and environmental bioengineering-from analysis and modeling to technology applications. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/20659
Imteaz, M. A., Hossain, A. B. M. S., & Bayatvarkeshi, M. (2021). A Mathematical modelling framework for quantifying production of biofuel from waste banana. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01517-7
Islam, M. (2011). River bank erosion and sustainable protection strategies. Journal of Engineering Science, 02(1&2), 63–72.
Jovanović, P. (1999). Application of sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation under uncertainty and risk. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00035-0
Langendoen, E., & Ursic, M. (2020). Quantifying the uncertainty in riverbank erosion for risk-informed river engineering. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19427.
Line, B., Denis, B., Guylaine, G., Mylène, L., Stéphane, L., Michel, B., et al. (2013). A riverbank erosion control method with environmental value. Ecological Engineering, 58, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.004
Ma, Z., Xia, C., & Cao, S. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis of China’s natural forest conservation program. Journal for Nature Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125818
Marchioni, A., & Magni, C. A. (2018). Investment decisions and sensitivity analysis: NPV-consistency of rates of return. European Journal of Operational Research., 268(1), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.007
Ministry of Finance, Mongolia. (2020). https://mof.gov.mn/article/entry/mongol-uls?fbclid=IwAR3Y5VoHwSpPjQ3Mn0zQhxS3eYMhoIlnWDPm8ppNZd8Soh1hp9X1miaxJo.
Ministry of Environment and Green Development. (2014). MARCC-2014: Mongolia second assessment report on climate change-2014. https://data.globalchange.gov/report/marcc-2014-mongolia-second-assessment-report-on-climate-change-2014
Ministry of Nature, Environment and Tourism, Mongolia. (2009). https://legalinfo.mn/mn/detail/15200?fbclid=IwAR1K_2OUngdg8kRwXGvpyNRuicGZNy3NnQPPjG4FPHD9YCJZEMgHwg6Ri5I.
Ministry of Nature, Environment and Tourism of Mongolia, United Nations Development Programme. (2017). Ecosystem-based adaptation approach to maintaining water security in critical water catchments in Mongolia. AF Project ID: MNG/MIE/EBA/201, UNDP Project ID: 00079875, UNDP PIMS: 4505. Retrieved from https://erc.undp.org/evaluation/documents/download/11902
Mishan, E. J., & Euston, Q. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis (6th ed.). Routledge.
Morgan, R. P. C., & Rickson, R. (1994). Slope stabilization and erosion control: A bioengineering approach. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362136
Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2006). Benefits transfer. In Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments (pp. 253–305). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264010055-18-en
Pearce, D. (1998). Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(4), 84–100.
Pietro P. D., Mahajan R. R. (2022) Erosion control solutions with case studies. In N. V. Chirla, R. Satyanarayana, S. Shinji (Eds.), Scour- and erosion-related issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4783-3_6
Posthumus, H., Deeks, L., Rickson, R. E., & Quinton, J. (2013). Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. Soil Use and Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12057
Quigley, J. T., & Harper, D. J. (2004). Streambank protection with rip-rap: An evaluation of the effects on fish and fish habitat. Habitat and Enhancement Branch, Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Retrieved from https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/library/ffip/Quigley_JT2004.pdf.
Sutton-Grier, A. E., & Sandifer, P. A. (2019). Conservation of wetlands and other coastal ecosystems: A commentary on their value to protect biodiversity, reduce disaster impacts, and promote human health and well-being. Wetlands, 39, 1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1039-0
Tisserant, M., Bourgeois, B., González, E., Evette, A., & Poulin, M. (2021). Controlling erosion while fostering plant biodiversity: A comparison of riverbank stabilization techniques. Ecological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106387
Tugjamba, N., Walkerden, G., & Miller, F. (2021). Adaptation strategies of nomadic herders in northeast Mongolia: Climate, globalisation and traditional knowledge. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1891032
UNFCCC. (2011). Assessing the costs and benefits of adaptation options: An overview of approaches. The Nairobi Work Programme on Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change, 52. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/pub_nwp_costs_benefits_adaptation.pdf
Veldkamp, A., Verburg, P. H., et al. (2004). Modelling land use and environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management, 72(1–2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.04.004
Warren, A. (2002). Land degradation is contextual. Land Degradation & Development, 13(6), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.532
Weissgerber, M., Jaunatre, R., Dommanget, F., Jacob, F., Huyghe, G., & Evette, A. (2019). Seeding dynamics from a local seed mixture on a bioengineered riverbank protection structure. Environmental Management, 64(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01180-9
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the [National University of Mongolia] under Grant [P2019-3753]; and [co-fund by Adaptation fund, Government of Mongolia, and UNDP].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myagmar, K., Darkhijav, B., Renchin, T. et al. Cost–benefit analysis for riverbank erosion control approaches in the steppe area. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 9251–9266 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02433-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02433-0