Abstract
For reducing fossil fuel demand and its environmental damages in Iran, the UN suggests removal of fossil fuel subsidies in this developing country which has the largest amount of energy subsidies in the world within 2010s. This research investigates the effectiveness of subsidy removal as a price policy in reducing the consumption of diesel which has the highest share in the total fossil fuel demand portfolio. The novelty of this research is that it compares the effects of price policy and energy efficiency on reducing diesel demand and improving sustainability to reveal which one is a more effective policy. To this aim, our study employs dynamic model, static model and error-correction model for estimating the diesel demand elasticities during 1976–2017. The results show that the diesel demand responds to changes in energy efficiency substantially, while it responds to changes in price slightly. Based on our findings, energy efficiency is about 30 times more effective than the price policy on reduction of diesel demand and improvement of the sustainable development pillars including economy, environment and social (health). A 10% improvement in energy efficiency at the first year of the studied period could reduce more than 87 billion liters of diesel consumption, 3 billion tons of CO2 emissions and 65 thousand deaths from the air pollution during the period. Therefore, the strategists should improve the technology especially the efficiency of energy-consuming utilities like cars, rather than increasing the price and removal of subsidy, to reduce diesel demand and improve sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data of this research are in the following link to the Mendeley (Taghvaee et al., 2022) https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/w2y9dccpvx/4.
Code availability
The EViews Work File and the data of this research are in the following link to the Mendeley (Taghvaee et al., 2022) https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/w2y9dccpvx/4.
References
Agheli, L. (2015). Estimating the demand for diesel in agriculture sector of Iran. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(3), 660–667.
Ahmadian, M., Chitnis, M., & Hunt, L. C. (2007). Gasoline demand, pricing policy and social welfare in the Islamic Republic of Iran. OPEC Review, 31(2), 105–124.
Ajanovic, A., Dahl, C., & Schipper, L. (2012). Modeling transport (energy) demand and policies. Energy Policy, 41, 3–16.
Aldy, J. E., & Armitage, S. (2020). The cost-effectiveness implications of carbon price certainty. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 113–118.
Alola, A. A. (2019). The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 260–267.
Alves, D., & Bueno, R. (2003). Short-run, long-run and cross elasticities of gasoline demand in Brazil. Energy Economics, 25, 191–199.
Arzaghi, M., & Squalli, J. (2015). How price inelastic is demand for gasoline in fuel-subsidizing economies? Energy Economics, 50, 117–124.
Atamanov, A., Dehzooei, M. M., & Wai-Poi, M., 2020. Welfare and fiscal implications from increased gasoline prices in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9235
Baranzini, A., & Weber, S. (2013). Elasticities of gasoline demand in Switzerland. Energy Policy, 63, 674–680.
Basso, L., & Oum, T. (2007). Automobile fuel demand: A critical assessment of empirical methodologies. Transport Reviews, 27(4), 449–484.
Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029.
Brockway, P. E., Sorrell, S., & Semieniuk, G. (2021). Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 141, 110781.
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2020. Economic Time Series Database. Retrieved from [Online] Available at: http://tsd.cbi.ir/ on 23 07 2020.
Chang, B., Kang, S., & Jung, T. (2019). Price and output elasticities of energy demand for industrial sectors in OECD countries. Sustainability, 11, 1786.
Chepeliev, M., & Mensbrugghe, D. (2020). Global fossil-fuel subsidy reform and Paris agreement. Energy Economics, 85, 104598.
Dahl, C. (2012). Measuring global gasoline and diesel price and income elasticities. Energy Policy, 41, 2–13.
Dahl, C., & Sterner, T. (1991). Analysing gasoline demand elasticities: A survey. Energy Economics, 13(3), 203–210.
Energy Balance Sheet, 2010. Retrieved from [Online] Available at: http://www.saba.org.ir/saba_content/media/image/2012/04/3550_orig.pdf on 2020.
Ghadaksaza, H., & Saboohi, Y. (2020). Energy supply transformation pathways in Iran to reduce GHG emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. Energy Strategy Reviews, 32, 100541.
Godarzi, A. A., & Maleki, A. (2020). Policy framework of non-fossil power plants in Iran’s electricity sector by 2030. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 29, 91–108.
Goodwin, P., Dargay, J., & Hanly, M. (2004). Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: A review. Transport Reviews, 24(3), 275–292.
Hadian, M., Raeissi, P., & Khalilabad, T. H. (2020). The economic burden of mortality and morbidity due to air pollution in Tehran, Iran: A systematic review. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13, 1001–1011.
Hales, S., Kovats, S., Lloyd, S., & Campbell-Lendrum, D. (2014). Quantitative risk assessment of the effects of climate change on selected causes of death, 2030s and 2050s. World Health Organization (WHO).2015: 1204
IEA, 2014. Energy technology perspectives 2014, s.l.: s.n.
IEA, 2019. World energy Outlook 2019, s.l.: s.n.
IEA, 2020. Fossil fuel subsidizing countries, s.l.: International Energy Agency.
Jewell, J., et al. (2018). Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions. Nature, 554, 229–233.
Jouzi, Z., Leung, Y.-F., & Nelson, S. (2020). Terrestrial protected areas and food security: A systematic review of research approaches. Environments, 7(10), 83.
Khorsandi, Danial, Nodehi, Mehrab, Waqar, Tayyab, Shabani, Majid, Kamare, Behnam, Zare, Ehsan Nazarzadeh, et al. (2021). Manufacturing of Microfluidic Sensors Utilizing 3D Printing Technologies: A Production System. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2021, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537074.
Labandeira, X., Labeaga, J. M., & López-Oteroa, X. (2017). A meta-analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand. Energy Policy, 102, 549–568.
Liddle, B., Smyth, R., & Zhang, X. (2020). Time-varying income and price elasticities for energy demand: Evidence from a middle-income panel. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3410511
Lim, K.-M., Kim, M., Kim, C. S., & Yoo, S.-H. (2012). Short-run and long-run elasticities of diesel demand in Korea. Energies, 5, 5055–5064.
Liu, Y., Lin, B., & Xu, B. (2021). Modeling the impact of energy abundance on economic growth and CO2 emissions by quantile regression: Evidence from China. Energy, 227, 120416.
Liua, X., et al. (2020). Clarifying the relationship among clean energy consumption, haze pollution and economic growth–based on the empirical analysis of China’s Yangtze River Delta Region. Ecological Complexity, 44, 100871.
Moshiri, S. (2020). Consumer responses to gasoline price and non-price policies. Energy Policy, 137, 111078.
Mousavi, M. H., & Ghavidel, S. (2019). Structural time series model for energy demand in Iran’s transportation sector. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.02.004
Mousavi, S., Alipour, A., & Shahvari, N. (2017). Liberalizing energy price and abatement cost of emissions: Evidence from Iranian agro-environment. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 19(3), 511–523.
Mundaca, G. (2017). How much can CO2 emissions be reduced if fossil fuel subsidies are removed? Energy Economics, 64, 91–104.
Nasrollahi, Z., Hashemi, M.-S., Bameri, S., & Taghvaee, V. M. (2018). Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: Using STIRPAT model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0237-5
National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company, 2014. Chapter 11. Retrieved from [Online] Available at: http://niordc.ir/uploads/fasle11.pdf on 23 07 2020.
Nodehi, M. (2022). Epoxy polyester and vinyl ester based polymer concrete: a review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00661-3
Nodehi, M., & Taghvaee, V.M. (2021a). Alkali-Activated Materials and Geopolymer: a Review of Common Precursors and Activators Addressing Circular Economy. Circular Economy and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00029-w
Nodehi, M., & Taghvaee, V.M. (2021b). Sustainable concrete for circular economy: a review on use of waste glass. Glass Structures and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-021-00155-9
Nodehi, M., Arani, A.A., & Taghvaee, V.M. (2021) Sustainability spillover effects and partnership between East Asia & Pacific versus North America: interactions of social, environment and economy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences. First online https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-021-00282-5
Nyangarika, A. M., Mikhaylov, A. Y., & Tang, B.-J. (2018). Correlation of oil prices and gross domestic product in oil producing countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(5), 2146–4553.
Parsa, H., Keshavarz, H., & Taghvaee, V. M. (2019). Industrial growth and sustainable development in Iran. Iranian Economic Review, 23(2), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2019.70281.
Polemis, M. (2006). Empirical assessment of the determinants of road energy demand in Greece. Energy Economics, 28(3), 385–403.
Raghoo, P., & Surroop, D. (2020). Price and income elasticities of oil demand in Mauritius: An empirical analysis using cointegration method. Energy Policy, 140, 111–400.
Rasoulinezhad, E., & Saboori, B. (2018). Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(18), 17354–17370.
Sene, S. O. (2012). Estimating the demand for gasoline in developing countries: Senegal. Energy Economics, 34(1), 189–194.
Shehabi, M. (2020). Diversification effects of energy subsidy reform in oil exporters: Illustrations from Kuwait. Energy Policy, 138, 110966.
Shirazi, J. K., Taghvaee, V. M., Nasiri, M., & Arani, A. A. (2020). Sustainable development and openness in oil-exporting countries: green growth and brown growth. Journal of Economic Structures. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-00216-2
Statistics Center of Iran, 2017. Statistical Yearbook, Tehran: s.n.
Sterner, T. (2007). Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy, 35, 3194–3202.
Taghvaee, V. M., & Parsa, H. (2015). Economic growth and environmental pollution in Iran: Evidence from manufacturing and services sectors. Custos E Agronegocio Line, 11(1), 115–127.
Taghvaee, V. M., Arani, A. A., Soretz, S., & Agheli, L. (2022). Data for energy efficiency and price policy for sustainable development in environment, health, social and economy: Fossil fuel demand elasticities using ARDL. Mendeley Dataset, Version 4. https://doi.org/10.17632/w2y9dccpvx.4
Taghvaee, V. M. et al. (2021). Sustainable development goals in Iran: transportation, health and public policy. Review of Economics and Political Science, Early cite. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-12-2019-0168
Taghvaee, S., Omaraee, B., & Taghvaee, V. (2017a). Maritime transportation, environmental pollution, and economic growth in Iran: Using dynamic log linear model and Granger causality approach. Iranian Economic Review, 21(2), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2017.62100
Taghvaee, V. M., et al. (2019). Environmental pollution and economic growth elasticities of maritime and air transportations in Iran. Marine Economics and Management, 2(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAEM-09-2019-0008
Taghvaee, V. M., & Hajiani, P. (2014). Price and income elasticities of gasoline demand in Iran: Using static, ECM, and dynamic models in short, intermediate, and long run. Modern Economy, 5, 939–950. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2014.59087
Taghvaee, V., Mavuka, C., & Shirazi, J. K. (2016). Economic growth and energy consumption in Iran: An ARDL approach including renewable and non-renewable energies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(6), 2405–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9862-z
Taghvaee, V. M., Shirazi, J. K., Boutabba, M. A., & Aloo, A. S. (2017b). Economic growth and renewable energy in Iran. Iranian Economic Review, 21(4), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2017.64081
Taghvaee, V. M. et al. (2021). Sustainable development goals in Iran: transportation, health and public policy. <i>Review of Economics and Political Science, Early cite. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-12-2019-0168
Tang, L., et al. (2019). Estimating human health damage factors related to CO2 emissions by considering updated climate-related relative risks. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 1118–1128.
UN, 2015. ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all, s.l.: United Nations.
UNFCCC, 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9, s.l.: United Nations.
Vita, G., Endresen, K., & Hunt, L. (2006). An empirical analysis of energy demand in Namibia. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3447–3463.
WHO, 2016, World Health Organization, Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease, Geneva, available at: http://www.who.int/airpollution/NCD_AP_2_pager_draft_v1_4_March_2018.pdf?ua=1
WHO, 2020. Health statistics and information systems. Retrieved from [Online] Available at: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/metrics_daly/en/ on 23 July 2020.
World Bank, 2019. Health Nutrition and Population Statistics. Retrieved from [Online] Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/health-nutrition-and-population-statistics on 23 July 2020.
Yasmeen, H., et al. (2021). Discovering the relationship between natural resources, energy consumption, gross capital formation with economic growth: Can lower financial openness change the curse into blessing. Resources Policy, 71, 102013.
Yeh, S., Witcover, J., Lade, G. E., & Sperling, D. (2016). A review of low carbon fuel policies: Principles, program status and future directions. Energy Policy, 97, 220–234.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taghvaee, V.M., Arani, A.A., Soretz, S. et al. Diesel demand elasticities and sustainable development pillars of economy, environment and social (health): comparing two strategies of subsidy removal and energy efficiency. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 2285–2315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02092-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02092-7