Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental regulation, carbon emissions and green total factor productivity: a case study of China

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of green economy development, efforts and measurements aimed to balance the relationship between the economy and environment have been vigorously promoted. Among these regulations, the policy of China’s carbon emissions trading (CET) pilot, one of the market-based environmental regulations, is favorable for China to take a path that can trigger both improvement of environmental quality and optimization of economic structure. In this paper, we adopt the slacks-based measure and data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model considering the undesired output and the Luenberger function to measure and decompose the green total factor productivity (GTFP) and verify the policy effect of CET on environment, economy and productivity through difference-in-differences (DID) approach. The results showed are as follows: (1) the policy of CET has promoted the reduction of carbon emission, whereas its impact on the industrial output is not significant. (2) We show that in the short turn, the CET policy does not immediately contribute to improvement of GTFP, whereas its effect on technological progress decomposed of GTFP is positive. The results indicate that CET regulation has produced environmental dividend and improved the technological progress, but there is no Porter effect. Overall, our results provide actual evidence for deepening the nationwide carbon emission trading system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. E., & Morton, B. J. (2004). Determining the cost-effective size of an emission trading region for achieving an ambient standard. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(3), 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S., & Marker, T. (2015). Residential energy efficiency standards in Australia: Where to next? Energy Efficiency, 8(5), 963–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigerna, S., D’Errico, M. C., & Polinori, P. (2019). Environmental and energy efficiency of EU electricity industry: An almost spatial two stages DEA approach. The Energy Journal, 40(1), 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity growth in APEC countries. Pacific Economic Review, 1(3), 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y., Liu, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). The economy impacts of Korean ETS with an emphasis on sectoral coverage based on a CGE approach. Energy Policy, 109, 835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, M., & Zhou, L. I. (2017). Key issues in designing China’s national carbon emissions tradingsystem. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 6(2), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C., & Ma, T. (2019). Technology adoption with carbon emission trading mechanism: Modeling with heterogeneous agents and uncertain carbon price. Annals of Operations Research, 1, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y., Li, M., Xue, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Evaluation of effectiveness of china’s carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation. Energy Economics, 90, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosal, V., Stephan, A., & Weiss, J. F. (2019). Decentralized environmental regulations and plant-level productivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 998–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (1993). Environmental regulation and manufacturing productivity at the plant level. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4321.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M., List, J. A., & Syverson, C. (2012). The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of US manufacturing. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18392.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Z. H. F., & Lansink, O. A. (2006). The source of productivity growth in Dutch agriculture: A perspective from finance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3), 644–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, B., Wang, B., Du, M., & Zhang, N. (2020). Does the SO2 emissions trading scheme encourage green total factor productivity? An empirical assessment on China’s cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 6375–6388.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Ren, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China. Energy Economics, 85, 104590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. D., Wang, B., Huang, S., & Song, M. L. (2020). The influence of increased population density in China on air pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1990). Environmental regulation and US economic growth. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(2), 314–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, X., Lu, C., & Liu, J. (2019). A synthesized factor analysis on energy consumption, economy growth, and carbon emission of construction industry in china. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(14), 13896–13905.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Gao, L., & Liu, J. (2020). The approach to carbon emission quotas of road transportation: A carbon emission intensity perspective. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Jia, Z. (2019). What will China’s carbon emission trading market affect with only electricity sector involvement? A CGE based study. Energy Economics, 78(2), 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Ma, C., & Xie, R. (2020). Structural, innovation and efficiency effects of environmental regulation: Evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Environmental and Resource Economics, 75(4), 741–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Z., Baležentis, T., & Tian, Z. (2019). Environmental performance and regulation effect of China’s atmospheric pollutant emissions: Evidence from “three regions and ten urban agglomerations.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 74(1), 211–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A. G., Muhammad, A. E. G., Kucukvar, M., & Bhutta, M. K. (2017). From green buildings to green supply chains: An integrated input-output life cycle assessment and optimization framework for carbon footprint reduction policy making. Management of Environmental Quality, 28(4), 532–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, Z. A., Zaigham, N. A., & Qadeer, A. (2014). Assessment of present conventional and non-conventional energy scenario of Pakistan. Renewable Sustain Energy Review, 31, 543–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Vander, L. C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2017). Evaluating the low-carbon development of urban China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(3), 939–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. D., Gao, M., Mangla, S. K., Song, M. L., & Wen, J. (2020). Effects of technological changes on China’s carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Y., Guan, D., Zheng, H., Ou, J., Li, Y., Meng, J., & Zhang, Q. (2018). China CO2 emission accounts 1997–2015. Scientific Data, 5, 170–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheni, Y., & Feng, J. (2017). Linking China’s ETS with the EU ETS: Possibilities and institutional challenges. Environmental Policy and Law, 47(3), 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjarseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2008). Implementing EU emissions trading: Success or failure? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(3), 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Li, M., Zhang, M., Khan, H. S. U. D., Li, J., Li, Z., & Anaba, O. A. (2021). A study on China’s economic growth, green energy technology, and carbon emissions based on the Kuznets curve (EKC). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6), 7200–7211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., Wu, J., & Yu, L. (2017). Carbon allowance auction design of China’s emissions trading scheme: A multi-agent-based approach. Energy Policy, 102(3), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2004). Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. RIPS Research Report Series.

  • van den Berg, Nicole J., van Soest, H. L., Hof, A. F., den Elzen, M. G., van Vuuren, D. P., Chen, W., & Blok, K. (2019). Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways. Climatic Change, 162(2), 1805–1822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasa, A. (2012). Certified emissions reductions and CDM limits: Revenue and distributional aspects. Climate Policy, 12(6), 645–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voituriez, T., & Wang, X. (2011). Getting the carbon price right through climate border measures: A Chinese perspective. Climate Policy, 11(5), 1257–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Feng, C., & Zhang, B. (2014). An empirical analysis of China’s energy efficiency from both static and dynamic perspectives. Energy, 74, 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Guo, X. (2019). Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the porter hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energy Policy, 132, 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Chen, Z., Wu, X., & Nie, X. (2019). Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method. Energy Policy, 129, 930–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Ren, S., & Hou, Y. (2020). Atmospheric environmental regulation and industrial total factor productivity: The mediating effect of capital intensity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 33112–33126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, F., Wu, N., & Gong, X. (2019). China’s carbon emissions trading and stock returns. Energy Economics, 86, 104627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Fan, Y., & Xia, Y. (2016). The economic effects of initial quota allocations on carbon emissions trading in china. The Energy Journal. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.SI1.jwu

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., Shi, B., Xu, M. & Feng, C. Can reducing carbon emissions improve economic performance – evidence from china, Economics, https://doi.org/doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-47 (2019).

  • Yu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2021). Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Economics, 96(2), 105125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang, J., Wan, L., & Li, Z. (2020). Does emission trading scheme have spillover effect on industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from the EU based on a PSM-DID approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 12345–12357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. J., Wei, Sh., & Lin, J. (2020). Does China’s carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 872–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Huo, X., Jin, B., & Yu, X. (2019). The efficiency of carbon trading market in China: Evidence from variance ratio tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(14), 14362–14372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, D. (2020). Identifying strategic traders in china’s pilot carbon emissions trading scheme. The Energy Journal. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.2.lzhu

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71803001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, 233030, China

    Xiaosheng Li & Yunxia Shu

  2. Jinhe Center for Economic Research, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710049, China

    Xin Jin

Authors
  1. Xiaosheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunxia Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaosheng Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Shu, Y. & Jin, X. Environmental regulation, carbon emissions and green total factor productivity: a case study of China. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 2577–2597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01546-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01546-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation