Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification and assessment of hidden capacities of urban resilience

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review of the resilience measurement indicators as a useful tool is a necessity for supporting urban decision making. The main objective of this research is to identify the priorities of resilience criteria to investigate the validity of the urban resilience questionnaire. The four main social, economic, physical, environmental, and institutional resilience indicators were examined by 52 faculty members and experts in urban planning, crisis management, social sciences, urban management, and architecture as a sample population. Then, using exploratory factor analysis by statistical package for social science (SPSS) software, three hidden factors were identified for social and institutional resilience, while four hidden factors were identified for economic and physical–environmental resilience. Finally, after preparing a questionnaire for the region, to evaluate each hidden factor, the use of the method of the mean sum of distances from the optimal resilience limit has been proposed to evaluate the effect of hidden factors. The results show that the distance of the resilience dimensions is close to 1; the city has a good resilience index. As distance close to 0, the city in Ann index has a critical situation and should be necessary measures to increase the resilience of the index. Using this pattern and identifying the criteria distance to optimal extent and measuring the influence of each city, the future cities can be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainuddin, S., & Routray, J. K. (2012). Earthquake hazards and community resilience in Baluchistan. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 909–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, P., & Bryant, M. (2010). The critical role of open space in earthquake recovery: A case study. In NZSEE conference, Wellington New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.

  • Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2011). Post-disaster reconstruction of the built environment: Building for resilience. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjan Wardekker, A., Wilk, B., Brown, V., et al. (2020). A diagnostic tool for supporting policy making on urban resilience. Cities, 101, 102691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behtash, F., Kaynezhad, M. R., Pirbabai, A., & Asgari, M. T. (2013). Evaluation and analysis of dimensions and components of Tabriz metropolis. Fine Arts, 18(3), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné, C., Mehta, L., McGranahan, G., Cannon, T., Gupte, J., & Tanner, T. (2018). Resilience as a policy narrative: Potentials and limits in the context of urban planning. Climate and Development, 10(2), 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E., Hommels, A., & Mesmann, J. (2014). Studying vulnerability in technological cultures. In A. Hommels, J. Mesman, & W. E. Bijker (Eds.), Vulnerability in technological cultures: New directions in research and governance (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., & McConnell, A. (2007). Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: The limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(1), 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozza, A., Asprone, D., & Fabbrocino, F. (2017). Urban resilience: A civil engineering perspective. Sustainability, 9(1), 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassett, J., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). Security and the performative politics of resilience: Critical infrastructure protection and humanitarian emergency preparedness. Security Dialogue, 46(1), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2014). Global environmental change I: A social turn for resilience? Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. G. (2012). The development of metrics for community resilience to natural disasters. PhD Thesis, College of Arts and Sciences, California State University.

  • Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. E., McDaniels, T., Fox, J., et al. (2014). Toward disaster-resilient cities: Characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments. Risk Analysis, 34(3), 416–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaffee, J. (2013). Towards next-generation urban resilience in planning practice: From securitization to integrated place making. Planning Practice & Research, 28(3), 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2016). Urban-rural differences in disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(6), 1236–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S., Barnes, L. L., Berry, M., Burton, Ch., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, L., Burton, G., & Emrich, T. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I., & Izadkhah, Y. (2006). Building resilient urban communities. Article from OHT, 31(1), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, B., Pan, H., Pallathucheril, V., & Fulton, G. (2017). Urban resilience and planning support systems: The need for sentience. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(1), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falahi, A., & Jalali, T. (2013). Suspended reconstruction from the point of view of urban design after the earthquake of 1382 Bam. Journal of Fine Arts, 18(3), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusen, E., & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazard Review, 4(3), 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 4, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, H., Saeedi, S. N., Ka’bay, A., Noushadi, I., & Haleafi, H. R. (2015). Implementation of exploratory factor analysis method in assessing competitiveness of port services. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 14(2), 96–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., Glasson, J., Wood, D., & Fulton, E. A. (2011). Regional planning and resilient futures: Destination modeling and tourism development—The case of the Ningaloo Coastal Region in Western Australia. Planning Practice and Research, 26(4), 393–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemian, Gh. R., Bagheri, H. & Shojaei, M. (2014). Investigating the extent of supporting the concept of urban vibration in the urban laws of Iran. In The first national conference on urban planning, urban management and sustainable development, Iranian Institute of Architecture, Tehran, Iran.

  • Khalatbari, J., & Bahar, S. (2010). Relationship between exposure and life satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(2), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharazi, S. (2014). Investigating the relation between wisdom with psychological well-being and quality of life. In First national conference on psychology and education, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan.

  • Klein, R. J., & Nicholls, F. (2003). Thomalla, Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5(1–2), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroger, W., & Zio, E. (2011). Vulnerable systems. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latifi, Gh R. (2010). Urban management. Tehran: Publishing Elm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y., Wang, J. A., Yue, Y., Zhou, H., & Yin, W. (2013). Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective. Natural Hazards, 70(1), 609–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B., & Hagen, P. C. (2007). Disasters and communities: Understanding social resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maru, Y. T. (2010). Resilient regions: Clarity of concepts and challenges to systemic measurement. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, 4(1), 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masnavi, M. R., Gharai, F., & Hajibandeh, M. (2019). Exploring urban resilience thinking for its application in urban planning: A review of literature. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 567–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoumi, L. (2015). The impact of lifestyle on urban flexibility (comparative study: regions 1 and 19 of Tehran). Master’s Thesis for Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran.

  • Masten, A. S., Powell, J. L., & Luthar, S. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities (pp. 1–25).

  • Mayunga, J. S. (2007). Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability and Resilience Building, 1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147(2016), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriläinen, E. (2020). The dual discourse of urban resilience: Robust city and self-organised neighborhoods. Disasters, 44(1), 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mieler, D. H., & Brechwald, D. (2012). Regional resilience initiative: Policy agenda for recovery. Earthquake and Hazards Specialist. Retrieved from http://bayareauasi.org/sites/default/files/resources/031413%20Agenda%20Item%209%20ABAG%20Report.pdf.

  • Monstadt, J., & Schmidt, M. (2019). Urban resilience in the making? The governance of critical infrastructures in German cities, Urban Studies, 56(11), 2353–2371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow-Howell, N., O’Neill, G., & Greenfield, J. C. (2011). Civic engagement: Policies and programs to support a resilient aging society. In Resilience in aging (Concepts, Research, and Outcomes) (pp. 147–162). New York: Springer.

  • Namjoyan, F., Razavian, M. T., & Server, R. (2015). Urban conservation a necessary framework for managing the future of cities. Geographical Land, 14(55), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., et al. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities and strategy for disaster. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiyan, M., Rezaei, M. R., Asgari, A., Parhizgar, A., & Shayan, S. (2011). Conceptual explanation of wrapping and indicating it in community-based disaster management. Journal of Planning and Space Design, 15(4), 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, M. R. (2010). Explanation of urban community resilience to reduce the effects of natural disasters (earthquake) (case study: Tehran metropolis). Ph.D. in Geography and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.

  • Rezaei, M. R. (2013). Evaluation of economic and institutional resilience of urban communities against natural disasters (Case study: Earthquake in Tehran’s neighborhoods). Journal of Crisis Management, 2(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, P. J. G., & Gonçalves, L. A. P. J. (2019). Urban resilience: A conceptual framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santo, R. (2010). Why resilience? A review of resilience and implications for feature educational research. Claremont Graduate University & San Diego State University.

  • Sapnas, K. G., & Zeller, R. A. (2002). Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10(2), 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepehr, A. (2014). Analysis of the role of ecological flexibility in urban ecosystems. Urban Planning, 5(17), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. London: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Elmqvist, T., Erik Andersson, E., Niki Frantzeskaki, N., et al. (2019). Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature Sustainability, 2, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilio, L., Murgante, B., Di Trani, F., Vona, M., & Masi, A. (2011). Resilient city and seismic risk: A spatial multi criteria approach, ICCSA. Part I (pp. 410–422). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis: A five- step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2019). Urban resilience and urban sustainability: What we know and what do not know? Cities, 72, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Yi, L., & Zhao, D. (2013). Community-based disaster management: A review of progress in China. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 2215–2239.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Taji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Questionnaire designed for identifying the urban resilience dimension

Appendix: Questionnaire designed for identifying the urban resilience dimension

Dimensions of resilience

Row

Questions

Options

Very low (1)

Low (2)

Medium (3)

High (4)

Very much (5)

Social

q1

Creating a coherent and integrated structure of community, personal and family support, and a suitable neighborhood

     

q2

The overall social cohesion of the city, lack of fragility and disintegration

     

q3

Access of all citizens to safe drinking water

     

q4

Possibility of healthy and adequate nutrition for all townspeople

     

q5

Providing safe housing facilities for all citizens (personal or rental)

     

q6

All citizens have access to affordable electricity and gas

     

q7

Careful monitoring of public health and public health (e.g., vaccination or screening)

     

q8

All citizens have access to all public health care

     

q9

Emergency medical and emergency response services

     

q10

Creating a sense of belonging and dependence on the city among people

     

q11

Active presence of citizens in city issues

     

Economic

q12

Establishing financial support mechanisms in risky conditions for urban businesses

     

q13

Equipping the city with powerful crime detection mechanisms

     

q14

Establishing transparent and fair institutions to fight corruption in the city

     

q15

Creating strong and flexible foundations of the economy in the city

     

q16

Attracting social potential, diversified capital, and economic brand of the city

     

q17

Establishing a strong relationship between the city’s economy and other economic (national or global) flows

     

q18

Creating a reliable two-way business flow between the private and public sectors

     

q19

Job-Welfare support for low-income people in the city

     

q20

Creating opportunities for people based on their education and skills

     

q21

The expansion of the growth and development of urban businesses

     

q22

Promoting justice and solution for civil disputes in an effective, affordable, impartial, and accessible mechanism

     

q23

Establishing security and peace in the city by proper and effective police actions

     

q24

Assistance to businesses through various support services (non-financial and livelihoods)

     

q25

Storing enough financial capital for the city and its proper management

     

Physical–environmental

q26

Establishing effective mechanisms for the protection of natural resources and the environment

     

q27

Implementation of appropriate building codes and standards

     

q28

Study of the effects of nature after the occurrence of a crisis (such as earthquake floods)

     

q29

Having vital arteries (water, electricity, gas) is good for protecting people from natural disasters

     

q30

Preparing a comprehensive map of the city’s high-risk areas

     

q31

Having an arterial transportation network (inside and outside the city)

     

q32

Management in the traffic flow and maintenance of the arterial network of the city

     

q33

Establishing telecommunication and Internet security

     

q34

Permanent control and maintenance of logistics and crisis management skills

     

q35

Establishing an appropriate and comprehensive telecommunication and networking system in the city

     

q36

Enhancing the capacity of the city’s infrastructure with proper management

     

q37

Creating diverse infrastructures for critical situations

     

q38

Permanent control and maintenance of the infrastructure and vital arteries of the city

     

Institutional

q39

Clarification of urban management decision-making mechanism

     

q40

High-quality and affordable education for all people in the city

     

q41

Awareness and general preparedness for exposure to danger

     

q42

Creating efficient, transparent, and fast mechanisms for linking urban management and citizens

     

q43

Creating a constructive and extensive relationship between people involved in urban management

     

q44

Establishing a great and effective management relationship between city and state administration as well as other public sectors

     

q45

Controlling systems for monitoring the risks and possible crises in urban management

     

q46

Reviewing urban planning and management policies and strategies

     

q47

Analysis of the monitoring system and the systematic collection of important urban data

     

q48

Having the necessary management skills in the event of a crisis

     

q49

Appropriate arrangement of land use in the city

     

q50

Adapting detailed designs to comprehensive urban plans

     

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghouchani, M., Taji, M., Yaghoubi Roshan, A. et al. Identification and assessment of hidden capacities of urban resilience. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 3966–3993 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00752-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00752-8

Keywords

Navigation