Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overpopulation and urban sustainable development—population carrying capacity in Shanghai based on probability-satisfaction evaluation method

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid and widespread urbanization, a large number of people pour into cities, which bring a series of urban diseases and directly threaten the sustainable development of the destination city. It is particularly important to reasonably measure the population carrying capacity to promote the sustainable development of cities. Therefore, based on Shanghai’s municipal data from 1985 to 2017, this paper used the probability-satisfaction method to predict the urban population carrying capacity of Shanghai in 2020. Several important findings are derived: First, there is a general pattern that the urban population carrying capacity increases as the probability-satisfaction level decreases; second, the sensitive degrees of the population carrying capacity of different constraining factors vary. The sensitive degrees of the city’s GDP, fiscal revenues and paved road areas are lower than those of other constraining factors; third, currently the number of medical practitioners, the paved road areas and the volume of waste emission are the three most important constraining factors in Shanghai. Fourth, results of the multifactor analysis reveal that when the probability-satisfaction level is equal to the ideal level, the overall population carrying capacity of Shanghai is between 17.55 million and 23.52 million; when the probability-satisfaction level research the acceptable level, the overall population carrying capacity of Shanghai is between 20.35 million and 30.12 million people. Therefore, by 2020, the Shanghai government needs to formulate well-considering population management plan according to actual resources conditions in order to achieve balanced and sustainable urban development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Botkin, D. B., & Beveridge, C. E. (1997). Cities as environments. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E. (1998). Emergy analysis of human carrying capacity and regional sustainability: An example using the state of maine. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51(1–2), 531–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, W., An, H., Li, H., Gao, X., & Sun, X. (2017). Urban economy development and ecological carrying capacity: Taking Beijing city as the case. Energy Procedia, 105, 3493–3498.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (1982). Potential population supporting capacities of lands in developing world. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z. M., & Li, P. (2018). Origin and development of the concept of bearing capacity: Discussions from the perspective of resources and environment. Journal of Natural Resources, 33(09), 1475–1489. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, H. W., & Du, W. (2016). Research on urban population carrying capacity with possibility and satisfiability method. Decision Reference, 14(02), 47–50. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., Wu, Z., Schimmele, C. M., & Li, S. Z. (2012). The effect of urbanization on China’s fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 31(3), 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, A. M., & Lee, H. (2015). The paradox of the sustainable city: Definitions and examples. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(06), 1267–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W., Wang, H., Zhao, H. R., & Wei, Y*. (2019). The temporal-spatial characteristics and key influencing factors of PM 2.5 concentrations in China: Based on a largely expanded list of potential influencing factors. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 18(12), 2587–2604.

  • Jiang, M., & Li, H. J. (2016). Evaluation model of regional water carrying capacity in shale gas development based on system dynamics method. Resources & Industries, 18(06), 33–39. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Indrawati, S. M., Liu, S. J., Han, J., Rohland, K., Hofman, B., et al. (2014). China: Promoting efficient, inclusive and sustainable urbanization. Management World, 04, 5–41. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. L., & Ren, Y. (2017). Research on system dynamics simulation model urban comprehensive carrying capacity. Ecological Economy, 33(02), 78–80. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S. F., Sun, J., Marinova, D., & Zhao, D. T. (2017). Effects of population and land urbanization on China’s environmental impact: Empirical analysis based on the extended STIRPAT model. Sustainability, 9(5), 825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. M. (2012). Comprehensive carrying capacity of the urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat International, 36(4), 462–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F. Y. (2014). The role of rational allocation of water resources in the region by water supply and demand balance analysis-take Puyang City as an example. China Mining Magazine, z1, 112–115. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., et al. (1972). The Limit to Growth. Washington: D.C., Potomac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington, R., & Gifford, R. (1973). Energy and how we live, Australian UNESCO Seminar, Committee for Man and Biosphere.

  • National Bureau of Statistics. (2017). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning, J., Liu, J. Y., Shao, Q. Q., & Fan, J. W. (2014). Multiply scenario simulations of environmental carrying capacity in the western region of China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(11), 136–146. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: Energy and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, T. (1994). A capacity approach for sustainable urban development: An empirical study. Regional Studies, 28(1), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Shanghai statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., Wang, H., & Yin, C. (2013a). Evaluation method of urban land population carrying capacity based on gis—A case of Shanghai, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39(3), 27–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y. S., Yin, C. Y., Wang, H. F., & Tan, W. K. (2013b). Research progress and prospect on urban comprehensive carrying capacity. Geographical Research, 32(1), 133–145. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Zhang, X. H., Zhang, H. W., & Niu, H. P. (2018). Coordinated development of a coupled social economy and resource environment system: A case study in Henan Province, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(3), 1385–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, R. (2014). A world population growth model: Interaction with earth’s carrying capacity and technology in limited space. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., & Sun, C. (2018). Comprehensive carrying capacity, economic growth and the sustainable development of urban areas: A case study of the Yangtze river economic belt. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 486–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. F., & Liu, G. J. (2011). Research on urban population carrying capacity with possibility and satisfiability method: A case study in Beijng, China. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 51(01), 152–157. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, I. C. (2018). Housing price convergence, transportation infrastructure and dynamic regional population relocation. Habitat International, 79, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO and FAO. (1985). Carrying capacity assessment with a pilot study of Kenya: A resource accounting methodology for exploring national options for sustainable development; UNESCO: Paris, France; FAO: Rome, Italy.

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1997). Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics, 20(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. C. (1982). Adopt the multi-objective decision-making method of possibility and satisfaction. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2(1), 14–22. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. G., Huang, C., Lam, P., & Patrick, T. I. (2015a). Using urban-carrying capacity as a benchmark for sustainable urban development: An empirical study of Beijing. Sustainability, 7, 3244–3268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Huang, C., Lam, P. T. I., & Yuan, Z. (2015b). Sustainable urban development: A review on urban carrying capacity assessment. Habitat International, 46, 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. G., Huang*, C., Li, J., & Xie, L. L. (2016). An evaluation model for urban carrying capacity: A case study of China’s mega-cities. Habitat International, 53, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. G., Li, Y., Liu, X. J., & Wu, M. (2019a). Sustainable development and green GDP assessments in mega-cities based on the emergy analysis method—A case study of Wuhan. Sustainable Development, 1–14.

  • Wei, Y., Li, Y., Wu, M., & Li, Y. (2019b). Progressing sustainable development of ‘the Belt and Road countries’: Estimating environmental efficiency based on the super-SBM model. Sustainable Development, 1–19.

  • Wei, Y., Wu, M., Li*, Y., & Li, Y. (2019c). The decomposition of total-factor CO2 emission efficiency of 97 contracting countries in Paris Agreement. Energy Economics, 78, 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y., Zhu, X., Li, Y., Yao, Y., & Tao, Y. (2019d). Influential factors of national and regional CO2 emission in China based on combined model of DPSIR and PLS-SEM. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 698–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • William, E. R. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment & Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Lai, G. Y., & Wang, H. Q. (2018). Research on climate carrying capacity evaluation of Nanchang City. Jiang Xi Science, 36(04), 615–618. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Wei, Y., Lam, P. T. I., Liu, F., & Li, Y. (2019). Is urban development ecologically sustainable? Ecological footprint analysis and prediction based on a modified artificial neural network model: A case study of Tianjin in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, Y. B., Xie, B. G., & Deng, C. X. (2013). Research on population capacity of Hunan Province by P–S model. Northwest Population, 34(03), 53–56. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y. P., Song, Y., & Wu, X. D. (2018). How far has China’s urbanization gone? Sustainability, 10, 2953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, N. N., Li, J. S., Lu, B. B., Luo, M. H., & Li, L. Z. (2019). Exploring the spatial pattern and influencing factors of land carrying capacity in Wuhan. Sustainability, 11(10), 2786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Yang, Z. F., & Yu, X. Y. (2006). Measurement and evaluation of interactions in complex urban ecosystem. Ecological Modeling, 196, 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Li, Y., Zhang, P., Wei*, Y., Zheng, X., & Xie, L. L. (2019a). Temporal-spatial characteristics of urban land use efficiency of China’s 35 mega cites based on DEA: Decomposing technology and scale efficiency. Land Use Policy, 88, 104083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Wei*, Y., Lai, Y., Li, Y., Zhong, S., & Dai, C. (2019b). Empirical analysis of the driving factors of China’s ‘land finance’ mechanism using soft budget constraint theory and the PLS-SEM model. Sustainability, 11(3), 742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. Z., Xia, J., & Wang, G. S. (2005). Assessment of water resources carrying-capacity with multi-criteria scenario analysis method: A case study in Zhangye region. Geographical Research, 24(05), 732–740. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Zhang, Z., Wei*, Y., Li, Y., & Zhao, H. (2019c). Measuring the efficiency and driving factors of urban land use based on the DEA method and the PLS-SEM model: A case study of 35 large and medium-sized cities in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101646.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (No. 71904009), MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 18YJC840041) and the First-class Discipline Construction Project of Central University of Finance and Economics “Research on Innovation of Public Sector Strategy and Performance Management Theory in the New Era” (No. CUFE2019-005). Besides, the authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that helped us improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Wei, Y. & Zhang, J. Overpopulation and urban sustainable development—population carrying capacity in Shanghai based on probability-satisfaction evaluation method. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 3318–3337 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00720-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00720-2

Keywords

Navigation